Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Space, page 20 of 36

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Space, Page 175

As sound films became popular in the late 1920s and 30s, cartoons were increasingly presented as containing sound, rather than merely accompanied by music and sound effects.

Both Amateur Nite (1929) and The Opry House (1929) use the theatre as a narrative frame for non-diegetic music, a background of sound. This framing technique for  sound soon gave way to the use of diegetic sound in cartoons. That is, sound and music changed from being a background to the action of the cartoon, to become something that the characters could hear and contribute to. 

In Amateur Nite, Oswald the Lucky Rabbit goes to a stage show and sees acts performed by animal characters with distinctly black bodies and white lips, a visual reminder of the role of blackface minstrelsy in vaudeville and in animation. Similarly, The Opry House depicts Mickey Mouse going to a show and performing three acts: snake-charming, an impression of a Hasidic Jew, and a piano solo. 

Bimbo's Initiation (1931) differed from past Fleischer cartoons that often played with the relationship between flat, 2-D drawn space and "real" cinematic space. In this cartoon Bimbo gets sucked into a manhole and ends up in a fantastic unified cinematic space that is shifting and unstable. 

Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Space, Page 175"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Space, page 20 of 36 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 30Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 21Labor, Page 98Labor, Page 110Race, Page 231Labor, Page 133Race, Page 221Performance, Page 74Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 109Space, Page 152Space, Page 181Space, Page 172Race, Page 232Race, Page 224Race, Page 230Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 291Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 115Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 96Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 193Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 45Space, Page 187Space, Page 141Race, Page 219Space, Page 190Space, Page 194Performance, Page 42Race, Page 258Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 165Space, Page 178Labor, Page 123Race, Page 251Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 2Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 195Space, Page 150Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 132Race, Page 247Space, Page 188Space, Page 138Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 35Space, Page 191Labor, Page 112Race, Page 248Labor, Page 102Space, Page 197Labor, Page 119Space, Page 146Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 162Race, Page 204Race, Page 261Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 70Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 97Space, Page 177Performance, Page 44Race, Page 213Space, Page 163Race, Page 254Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 268Performance, Page 82Space, Page 148Space, Page 169Race, Page 239Space, Page 155Space, Page 171Performance, Page 52Race, Page 220Space, Page 182Race, Page 229Race, Page 235Space, Page 159Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 183Space, Page 137Space, Page 143Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 101Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 156Labor, Page 131Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 242Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 54Space, Page 170Space, Page 184Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 76Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 166