Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 72

The term "pickaninny" is a derogatory term for poor African American children, who were (and are) often stereotyped as immature, rebellious, and immune to pain. According to Felix the Cat creator Otto Messmer, Pat Sullivan, the producer of Felix, had first created a character, Sammy Jonsin, who was based on the stereotype of the pickaninny. That character eventually became Felix.

The pickanniny was a common figure in popular culture during the early twentieth century. A Blatz gum ad from a 1928 issue of the movie fan magazine Photoplay blithely asks why a pickaninny loves watermelon, implying that his uncontrollable appetites will lead him to steal that same fruit.

That voraciousness is on display when Felix dreams of an ideal future in which he can eat endlessly in Futuritzy (1928), simultaneously demonstrating the economy of line and of stereotype through which Sullivan Studios created its animated worlds.

Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 72"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 18 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 29Introduction, Page 14Introduction, Page 18Space, Page 150Labor, Page 123Race, Page 239Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 46Space, Page 197Space, Page 178Space, Page 152Space, Page 143Space, Page 175Performance, Page 62Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 34Space, Page 181Performance, Page 42Space, Page 194Performance, Page 52Space, Page 177Labor, Page 133Space, Page 188Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 272Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 20Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 137Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 80Race, Page 258Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 126Race, Page 213Race, Page 261Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 84Space, Page 148Race, Page 224Race, Page 232Space, Page 155Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 74Space, Page 163Performance, Page 45Race, Page 229Space, Page 189Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 182Race, Page 253Space, Page 193Race, Page 231Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 50Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 171Conclusion, Page 289Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 251Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 132Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 184Labor, Page 122Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 23Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 138Performance, Page 67Race, Page 252Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 206Space, Page 156Race, Page 219Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 274Labor, Page 101Labor, Page 131Space, Page 146Space, Page 172introduction-page-22Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 78Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 119Race, Page 225Race, Page 230Race, Page 254Labor, Page 129Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 268Race, Page 248Space, Page 141Race, Page 247Labor, Page 96Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 159Race, Page 257Space, Page 165Performance, Page 56Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 191Race, Page 245Space, Page 183Labor, Page 93Space, Page 169Performance, Page 40Introduction, Page 6Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 12Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 102Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 192