Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 253Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 122Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 43Space, Page 150Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 128Race, Page 247Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 143Space, Page 182Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 162Space, Page 193Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 74Race, Page 206Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 175Performance, Page 52Space, Page 189Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 82Race, Page 252Space, Page 197Race, Page 220Race, Page 235Performance, Page 56Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 146Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 231Labor, Page 88Race, Page 239Labor, Page 113Space, Page 190Race, Page 225Space, Page 178Performance, Page 84Space, Page 188Space, Page 155Race, Page 229Space, Page 141Labor, Page 129Race, Page 204Space, Page 177Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 230Labor, Page 101Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 296Labor, Page 119Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 115Space, Page 187Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 181Performance, Page 46Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 98Race, Page 254Space, Page 163Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 286Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 248Race, Page 258Space, Page 183Race, Page 221Space, Page 148Space, Page 194Space, Page 172Race, Page 224Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 213Labor, Page 97Race, Page 232Race, Page 261Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 78Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 96