Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 206Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 224Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 193Race, Page 231Labor, Page 112Race, Page 251Space, Page 155Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 77Race, Page 247Performance, Page 52Space, Page 141Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 98Space, Page 172Race, Page 225Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 74Space, Page 187Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 194Performance, Page 43Space, Page 146Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 84Race, Page 232Space, Page 152Space, Page 181Labor, Page 128Race, Page 230Space, Page 175Space, Page 163Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 70Space, Page 150Labor, Page 122Space, Page 177Race, Page 239Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 188Performance, Page 42Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 220Space, Page 189Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 56Space, Page 162Labor, Page 96Race, Page 252Performance, Page 34Race, Page 204Labor, Page 101Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 191Race, Page 213Race, Page 221Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 129Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 183Space, Page 182Race, Page 229Race, Page 253Performance, Page 41Space, Page 197Space, Page 138Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 115Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 78Labor, Page 97Performance, Page 82Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 9