Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 182Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 181Performance, Page 56Labor, Page 98Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 72Space, Page 155Space, Page 175Race, Page 239Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 296Labor, Page 101Space, Page 141Space, Page 190Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 52Race, Page 253Race, Page 204Performance, Page 34Space, Page 197Performance, Page 45Race, Page 224Performance, Page 44Space, Page 138Performance, Page 35Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 29Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 286Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 70Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 258Space, Page 188Race, Page 229Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 132Race, Page 221Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 110Race, Page 232Performance, Page 78Performance, Page 77Race, Page 247Labor, Page 133Race, Page 231Race, Page 206Space, Page 187Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 193Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 252Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 123Space, Page 177Space, Page 162Labor, Page 96Race, Page 230Race, Page 235Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 112Space, Page 172Labor, Page 119Space, Page 146Space, Page 165Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 152Space, Page 178Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 191Race, Page 220Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 60Space, Page 170Space, Page 183Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 194Labor, Page 97Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 251Race, Page 261Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 213Labor, Page 115