Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 9Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 35Space, Page 146Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 43Space, Page 178Performance, Page 45Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 191Space, Page 175Labor, Page 97Labor, Page 119Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 44Race, Page 224Performance, Page 74Race, Page 221Space, Page 183Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 258Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 232Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 239Labor, Page 98Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 112Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 56Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 190Space, Page 150Space, Page 187Space, Page 193Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 115Labor, Page 132Space, Page 162Race, Page 254Race, Page 248Race, Page 204Labor, Page 123Space, Page 148Space, Page 197Space, Page 182Space, Page 188Race, Page 247Race, Page 206Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 225Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 84Space, Page 189Space, Page 181Space, Page 152Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 229Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 78Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 21Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 235Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 34Space, Page 155Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 110Space, Page 143Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 194Performance, Page 77Race, Page 252Space, Page 141Space, Page 170Space, Page 138Race, Page 220Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 230Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 70Race, Page 253Race, Page 213Space, Page 163Labor, Page 96Space, Page 165Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 101