Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.

Comment on this page

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 187Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 52Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 72Space, Page 182Race, Page 220Space, Page 178Race, Page 239Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 231Performance, Page 54Space, Page 155Space, Page 189Space, Page 143Labor, Page 133Space, Page 172Race, Page 206Performance, Page 34Race, Page 247Race, Page 232Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 21Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 122Race, Page 253Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 112Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 56Performance, Page 46Space, Page 141Space, Page 148Performance, Page 74Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 101Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 35Labor, Page 123Labor, Page 129Space, Page 188Space, Page 146Performance, Page 47Space, Page 190Space, Page 138Performance, Page 82Race, Page 230Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 248Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 252Performance, Page 77Race, Page 258Space, Page 152Race, Page 224Race, Page 254Space, Page 193Race, Page 229Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 221Performance, Page 78Performance, Page 60Space, Page 163Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 165Space, Page 162Race, Page 235Race, Page 251Race, Page 213Performance, Page 41Space, Page 181Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 97Space, Page 197Race, Page 204Labor, Page 115Performance, Page 70Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 96Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 191