Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 52Space, Page 148Space, Page 146Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 193Space, Page 177Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 60Race, Page 253Space, Page 175Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 35Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 112Space, Page 187Space, Page 178Race, Page 232Race, Page 247Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 54Race, Page 206Labor, Page 122Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 150Race, Page 248Labor, Page 129Race, Page 230Performance, Page 82Race, Page 258Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 152Performance, Page 74Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 45Space, Page 162Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 163Performance, Page 47Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 172Space, Page 188Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 34Race, Page 252Race, Page 239Conclusion, Page 291Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 9Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 132Introduction, Page 21Labor, Page 123Race, Page 221Race, Page 224Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 42Space, Page 189Performance, Page 46Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 261Labor, Page 109Space, Page 141Labor, Page 113Space, Page 155Labor, Page 115Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 77Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 70Space, Page 138Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 235Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 101Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 204Labor, Page 97Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 191Space, Page 181Race, Page 231Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 213Labor, Page 96Space, Page 183Performance, Page 78Space, Page 165Race, Page 251Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 56Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 278