Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 172Race, Page 252Race, Page 230Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 9Race, Page 224Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 109Space, Page 155Race, Page 248Performance, Page 77Space, Page 187Race, Page 247Space, Page 150Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 112Race, Page 254Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 74Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 96Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 46Space, Page 177Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 122Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 232Labor, Page 123Race, Page 229Space, Page 182Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 251Space, Page 197Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 225Labor, Page 115Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 204Race, Page 220Space, Page 143Performance, Page 82Space, Page 190Labor, Page 128Space, Page 183Labor, Page 133Space, Page 148Space, Page 189Performance, Page 44Race, Page 221Space, Page 141Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 52Performance, Page 43Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 239Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 181Space, Page 194Space, Page 162Space, Page 165Race, Page 261Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 72Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 88Space, Page 188Performance, Page 78Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 34Race, Page 213Labor, Page 129Space, Page 163Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 97Labor, Page 101Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 191Performance, Page 56Race, Page 235Space, Page 152Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 278