Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Labor, Page 88Space, Page 187Performance, Page 77Space, Page 155Race, Page 235Race, Page 230Performance, Page 78Space, Page 138Race, Page 225Race, Page 253Space, Page 175Space, Page 143Space, Page 146Labor, Page 119Race, Page 254Space, Page 152Space, Page 150Performance, Page 56Performance, Page 47Space, Page 141Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 54Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 213Labor, Page 110Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 204Race, Page 232Space, Page 148Space, Page 177Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 247Labor, Page 98Space, Page 165Race, Page 229Race, Page 258Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 122Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 300Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 84Space, Page 183Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 72Race, Page 220Space, Page 191Race, Page 231Space, Page 188Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 181Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 178Race, Page 224Performance, Page 46Race, Page 261Space, Page 162Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 189Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 96Space, Page 194Labor, Page 123Race, Page 221Performance, Page 60Race, Page 252Labor, Page 115Performance, Page 35Race, Page 206Introduction, Page 9Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 239Race, Page 248Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 197Space, Page 163Performance, Page 70Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 101Space, Page 190Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 97