Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 42Space, Page 188Labor, Page 123Race, Page 258Labor, Page 88Race, Page 254Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 54Space, Page 197Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 132Space, Page 175Space, Page 177Space, Page 163Space, Page 189Space, Page 182Space, Page 194Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 181Race, Page 239Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 193Performance, Page 45Race, Page 220Space, Page 150Performance, Page 77Space, Page 172Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 298Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 113Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 138Space, Page 162Race, Page 206Space, Page 178Race, Page 231Performance, Page 47Race, Page 247Space, Page 141Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 115Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 251Performance, Page 74Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 9Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 248Space, Page 190Space, Page 191Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 52Space, Page 183Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 133Race, Page 261Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 23Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 148Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 34Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 109Race, Page 224Performance, Page 56Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 146Labor, Page 129Space, Page 143Labor, Page 97Space, Page 165Labor, Page 96Performance, Page 72Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 229Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 253Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 225Race, Page 204Race, Page 252Performance, Page 41Race, Page 232Race, Page 235Race, Page 230Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 82Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 112Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 78Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 275