Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Conclusion, Page 304Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 77Race, Page 261Performance, Page 70Conclusion, Page 290Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 194Race, Page 247Race, Page 204Performance, Page 35Space, Page 162Race, Page 235Race, Page 251Performance, Page 74Space, Page 178Space, Page 189Labor, Page 88Race, Page 248Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 34Space, Page 143Race, Page 229Labor, Page 123Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 150Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 191Space, Page 190Labor, Page 113Space, Page 187Space, Page 138Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 72Space, Page 188Performance, Page 46Space, Page 141Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 52Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 221Labor, Page 128Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 56Space, Page 183Labor, Page 109Race, Page 206Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 112Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 42Space, Page 155Performance, Page 84Race, Page 252Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 44Race, Page 239Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 115Performance, Page 43Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 175Race, Page 225Race, Page 213Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 232Space, Page 177Labor, Page 96Space, Page 181Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 101Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 170Space, Page 193Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 78Race, Page 220Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 97Race, Page 254Labor, Page 119Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 152Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 172Race, Page 258Space, Page 163Introduction, Page 1Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 60