Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 46Race, Page 247Performance, Page 84Space, Page 143Labor, Page 133Space, Page 187Space, Page 194Race, Page 221Space, Page 146Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 113Race, Page 230Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 239Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 52Space, Page 178Space, Page 150Space, Page 181Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 109Space, Page 148Race, Page 229Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 44Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 289Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 190Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 88Race, Page 254Race, Page 204Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 123Labor, Page 129Space, Page 182Labor, Page 101Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 138Space, Page 165Performance, Page 77Space, Page 155Space, Page 152Race, Page 220Race, Page 231Space, Page 172Space, Page 193Race, Page 261Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 296Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 78Race, Page 213Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 175Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 251Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 41Race, Page 206Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 6Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 188Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 115Space, Page 162Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 9Labor, Page 119Race, Page 252Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 56Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 97Space, Page 197Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 224Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 232Race, Page 258Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 303Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 96