Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 232Space, Page 178Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 47Space, Page 188Labor, Page 115Race, Page 258Labor, Page 109Space, Page 175Space, Page 190Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 72Introduction, Page 21Labor, Page 129Race, Page 213Space, Page 181Race, Page 247Space, Page 155Labor, Page 113Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 88Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 261Race, Page 251Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 141Race, Page 229Performance, Page 34Race, Page 220Space, Page 148Space, Page 172Race, Page 239Labor, Page 133Space, Page 194Performance, Page 84Space, Page 152Race, Page 221Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 177Labor, Page 123Space, Page 187Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 254Race, Page 231Space, Page 183Performance, Page 35Space, Page 150Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 163Performance, Page 74Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 56Race, Page 224Race, Page 230Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 204Performance, Page 70Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 98Race, Page 253Labor, Page 122Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 182Performance, Page 43Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 248Space, Page 165Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 78Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 9Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 97Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 252Space, Page 191Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 60Space, Page 170Labor, Page 96