Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 184Performance, Page 84Space, Page 182Performance, Page 47Space, Page 188Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 225Space, Page 165Race, Page 213Race, Page 231Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 123Space, Page 170Space, Page 193Space, Page 178Race, Page 252Race, Page 219Space, Page 148Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 183Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 40Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 122Race, Page 224Race, Page 229Race, Page 232Space, Page 152Space, Page 138Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 190Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 54Space, Page 163Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 175Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 132Space, Page 155Race, Page 248Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 131Race, Page 220Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 194Performance, Page 82Space, Page 195Labor, Page 128Race, Page 239Race, Page 254Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 43Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 181Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 177Race, Page 206Space, Page 141Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 253Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 261Space, Page 150Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 72Race, Page 230Labor, Page 109Space, Page 143Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 291Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 35Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 162Labor, Page 88Introduction, Page 15Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 45Race, Page 247