Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 229Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 44Space, Page 146Space, Page 170Performance, Page 82Race, Page 232Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 163Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 291Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 231Race, Page 213Space, Page 190Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 84Space, Page 152Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 40Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 141Space, Page 138Performance, Page 43Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 248Space, Page 165Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 122Race, Page 252Space, Page 191Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 42Race, Page 251Space, Page 177Race, Page 221Race, Page 247Space, Page 189Race, Page 220Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 98Space, Page 178Race, Page 224Space, Page 162Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 16Labor, Page 132Space, Page 182Race, Page 239Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 194Race, Page 258Space, Page 195Introduction, Page 15Labor, Page 88Space, Page 184Performance, Page 52Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 181Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 183Space, Page 155Race, Page 219Space, Page 172Space, Page 188Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 230Labor, Page 129Space, Page 143Performance, Page 60Space, Page 150Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 35Space, Page 148Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 261Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 72Race, Page 254Race, Page 204Race, Page 235Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 110