Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 170Race, Page 206Race, Page 225Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 123Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 41Race, Page 239Performance, Page 45Race, Page 253Performance, Page 40Race, Page 224Race, Page 232Space, Page 197Performance, Page 72Space, Page 141Space, Page 175Race, Page 204Labor, Page 119Space, Page 163Race, Page 219Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 296Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 286Introduction, Page 16Space, Page 165Labor, Page 128Race, Page 230Race, Page 261Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 178Space, Page 183Space, Page 188Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 189Space, Page 191Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 193Labor, Page 88Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 146Space, Page 162Performance, Page 47Space, Page 190Race, Page 258Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 187Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 50Performance, Page 34Race, Page 248Space, Page 155Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 30Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 184Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 235Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 122Space, Page 195Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 98Race, Page 220Performance, Page 42Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 132Race, Page 252Space, Page 181Space, Page 148Race, Page 247Race, Page 231Performance, Page 54Space, Page 152Performance, Page 43Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 171Space, Page 143Introduction, Page 15Space, Page 150Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 110