Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Labor, Page 132Space, Page 183Race, Page 232Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 195Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 213Space, Page 187Space, Page 193Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 230Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 178Race, Page 220Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 112Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 165Performance, Page 84Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 163Space, Page 189Race, Page 239Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 225Space, Page 138Race, Page 261Space, Page 141Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 119Space, Page 194Race, Page 248Performance, Page 60Space, Page 162Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 40Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 258Performance, Page 50Race, Page 206Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 182Space, Page 184Race, Page 251Labor, Page 113Race, Page 204Performance, Page 35Space, Page 181Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 44Space, Page 152Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 77Space, Page 190Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 148Race, Page 235Performance, Page 52Space, Page 146Space, Page 170Space, Page 188Race, Page 252Race, Page 224Space, Page 137Space, Page 175Race, Page 254Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 110Race, Page 231Race, Page 229Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 247Space, Page 177Performance, Page 47Space, Page 150Space, Page 172Performance, Page 72Space, Page 143Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 15Performance, Page 74Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 34Space, Page 171