Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 230Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 252Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 258Labor, Page 98Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 213Space, Page 141Race, Page 254Space, Page 155Race, Page 231Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 15Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 289Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 183Space, Page 195Race, Page 251Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 162Space, Page 182Space, Page 197Space, Page 148Labor, Page 119Race, Page 248Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 40Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 123Space, Page 194Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 44Race, Page 261Space, Page 146Space, Page 137Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 132Space, Page 191Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 16Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 188Race, Page 232Labor, Page 110Race, Page 239Space, Page 165Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 171Space, Page 163Space, Page 177Labor, Page 112Space, Page 138Performance, Page 84Space, Page 184Performance, Page 77Space, Page 175Space, Page 181Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 109Race, Page 229Performance, Page 72Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 225Space, Page 193Race, Page 247Space, Page 150Space, Page 190Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 74Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 290Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 152Space, Page 143Performance, Page 50Race, Page 235Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 47Race, Page 204