Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 178Race, Page 253Race, Page 220Space, Page 170Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 163Labor, Page 110Race, Page 252Introduction, Page 16Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 194Space, Page 183Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 34Race, Page 248Introduction, Page 14Introduction, Page 15Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 119Race, Page 261Performance, Page 72Race, Page 221Race, Page 225Space, Page 172Race, Page 231Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 181Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 29Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 47Space, Page 138Race, Page 213Space, Page 193Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 40Race, Page 232Space, Page 171Performance, Page 35Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 54Space, Page 177Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 182Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 204Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 189Labor, Page 131Space, Page 187Introduction, Page 30Performance, Page 44Race, Page 230Space, Page 155Labor, Page 128Space, Page 162Labor, Page 113Labor, Page 132Space, Page 197Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 129Race, Page 258Performance, Page 50Space, Page 152Space, Page 175Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 123Race, Page 224Space, Page 148Performance, Page 45Race, Page 247Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 235Space, Page 141Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 52Space, Page 137Space, Page 190Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 195Race, Page 239Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 98Space, Page 184Race, Page 219Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 188Space, Page 150Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 42