Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 252Space, Page 177Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 191Space, Page 143Space, Page 175Race, Page 213Space, Page 187Space, Page 163Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 231Performance, Page 43Race, Page 219Race, Page 204Space, Page 138Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 261Space, Page 181Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 98Space, Page 197Performance, Page 50Space, Page 189Space, Page 190Performance, Page 41Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 21Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 165Performance, Page 84Race, Page 221Performance, Page 47Space, Page 178Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 131Race, Page 239Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 133Race, Page 248Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 123Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 15Space, Page 183Race, Page 220Performance, Page 35Race, Page 206Performance, Page 60Race, Page 232Space, Page 137Space, Page 152Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 42Race, Page 258Race, Page 247Conclusion, Page 300Introduction, Page 29Introduction, Page 16Space, Page 171Space, Page 155Race, Page 235Performance, Page 44Space, Page 194Space, Page 193Space, Page 188Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 182Space, Page 146Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 230Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 82Space, Page 172Space, Page 150Space, Page 162Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 112Race, Page 254Labor, Page 109Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 195Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 119Space, Page 184Performance, Page 40Performance, Page 52Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 34Race, Page 229Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 291