Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 193Space, Page 162Performance, Page 46Race, Page 206Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 188Race, Page 253Space, Page 177Performance, Page 47Space, Page 182Race, Page 258Race, Page 231Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 60Space, Page 165Performance, Page 74Race, Page 248Space, Page 152Race, Page 220Labor, Page 123Labor, Page 119Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 141Labor, Page 122Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 187Space, Page 194Space, Page 184Space, Page 172Race, Page 252Race, Page 232Performance, Page 42Space, Page 183Space, Page 181Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 45Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 225Race, Page 229Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 112Space, Page 150Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 131Space, Page 190Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 72Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 235Performance, Page 54Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 109Space, Page 138Performance, Page 84Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 50Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 98Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 191Race, Page 239Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 82Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 171Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 15Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 133Race, Page 247Race, Page 230Labor, Page 113Race, Page 213Space, Page 175Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 195Race, Page 251Space, Page 146Race, Page 254Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 143Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 40Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 35