Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 300Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 248Space, Page 146Race, Page 232Race, Page 247Race, Page 231Space, Page 172Race, Page 252Labor, Page 98Space, Page 181Space, Page 163Space, Page 175Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 182Labor, Page 129Race, Page 239Space, Page 193Space, Page 177Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 230Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 72Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 42Space, Page 189Performance, Page 47Space, Page 184Labor, Page 123Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 188Race, Page 254Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 197Race, Page 235Labor, Page 112Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 150Labor, Page 101Race, Page 229Space, Page 191Space, Page 148Performance, Page 84Race, Page 206Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 171Race, Page 204Introduction, Page 21Performance, Page 54Race, Page 251Space, Page 165Labor, Page 113Race, Page 225Labor, Page 102Space, Page 152Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 133Race, Page 258Labor, Page 110Race, Page 213Space, Page 195Race, Page 261Performance, Page 70Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 220Space, Page 194Space, Page 170Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 34Introduction, Page 30Performance, Page 35Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 52Space, Page 162Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 253Space, Page 143Performance, Page 44Race, Page 224Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 141Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 183Performance, Page 50Race, Page 219Performance, Page 40Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 155Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 303Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 275