Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Labor, Page 123Space, Page 175Race, Page 252Race, Page 229Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 1Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 225Race, Page 248Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 150Space, Page 163Labor, Page 110Race, Page 235Space, Page 189Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 206Space, Page 197Race, Page 220Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 132Race, Page 251Labor, Page 98Race, Page 261Space, Page 162Space, Page 193Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 224Race, Page 219Race, Page 230Labor, Page 109Space, Page 181Performance, Page 40Space, Page 187Performance, Page 70Race, Page 204Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 129Race, Page 213Race, Page 231Space, Page 165Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 152Race, Page 232Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 254Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 184Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 54Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 155Space, Page 194Space, Page 178Performance, Page 42Space, Page 182Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 45Space, Page 177Performance, Page 50Space, Page 146Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 247Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 183Space, Page 191Labor, Page 102Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 77Race, Page 239Performance, Page 72Space, Page 148Labor, Page 101Space, Page 171Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 35Labor, Page 112Space, Page 170Space, Page 143Performance, Page 82Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 188Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 43Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 41