Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 187Labor, Page 133Introduction, Page 29Introduction, Page 21Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 84Race, Page 206Labor, Page 119Space, Page 190Space, Page 182Space, Page 148Race, Page 252Labor, Page 110Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 109Space, Page 165Race, Page 230Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 98Race, Page 204Space, Page 197Performance, Page 54Race, Page 258Space, Page 181Conclusion, Page 296Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 47Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 74Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 170Labor, Page 112Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 155Space, Page 193Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 50Space, Page 141Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 35Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 152Space, Page 194Race, Page 254Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 143Space, Page 138Labor, Page 129Space, Page 188Race, Page 229Race, Page 239Race, Page 251Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 183Space, Page 184Performance, Page 77Space, Page 189Space, Page 171Race, Page 235Race, Page 232Space, Page 162Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 213Labor, Page 101Race, Page 231Race, Page 261Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 88Space, Page 195Labor, Page 132Race, Page 224Performance, Page 82Race, Page 248Race, Page 253Performance, Page 52Race, Page 247Performance, Page 72Space, Page 163Labor, Page 102Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 113Race, Page 219Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 44Space, Page 137Performance, Page 40Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 273