Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 84Race, Page 221Space, Page 193Space, Page 190Labor, Page 129Race, Page 248Space, Page 162Race, Page 225Performance, Page 82Race, Page 261Race, Page 231Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 188Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 131Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 74Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 178Race, Page 258Race, Page 253Performance, Page 54Space, Page 175Race, Page 252Performance, Page 50Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 102Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 187Labor, Page 128Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 304Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 235Labor, Page 110Space, Page 152Space, Page 197Space, Page 189Space, Page 182Labor, Page 88Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 219Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 133Space, Page 177Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 148Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 230Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 165Race, Page 206Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 52Space, Page 141Race, Page 239Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 146Labor, Page 123Space, Page 181Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 137Race, Page 220Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 119Race, Page 247Space, Page 150Space, Page 170Race, Page 204Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 112Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 224Performance, Page 60Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 300Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 195Performance, Page 77Space, Page 171Space, Page 138Performance, Page 40Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 184Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 213Space, Page 191Labor, Page 113Space, Page 143Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 303