Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 258Space, Page 146Space, Page 182Space, Page 193Performance, Page 46Space, Page 187Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 101Labor, Page 133Introduction, Page 6Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 254Performance, Page 74Space, Page 189Space, Page 194Performance, Page 77Space, Page 143Race, Page 230Race, Page 229Labor, Page 132Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 175Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 162Labor, Page 123Space, Page 181Performance, Page 45Race, Page 261Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 165Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 52Space, Page 188Performance, Page 44Race, Page 251Space, Page 172Race, Page 213Race, Page 248Space, Page 178Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 221Performance, Page 47Race, Page 239Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 232Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 275Labor, Page 119Race, Page 204Space, Page 195Race, Page 220Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 70Space, Page 190Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 82Space, Page 184Performance, Page 42Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 150Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 224Labor, Page 129Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 296Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 206Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 35Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 141Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 43Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 170Space, Page 152Space, Page 171Space, Page 137Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 40Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 72Race, Page 247Labor, Page 102Race, Page 219Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 131Space, Page 163