Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 30

The racist representation of African-Americans is marked by continuity and discontinuity. The minstrel did not necessarily disappear with the decline of blackface minstrelsy in the late 19th and early twentieth centuries. It faded from prominence, but was joined by more virulent and intense caricatures in the swing era. 

George Pal's Puppetoons (1932-47) used hand-carved dolls in stop-motion cartoons. This short, Jasper and the Haunted House, features several stereotypical representations of black people, particularly the main character Jasper, a "pickaninny" about to deliver a gooseberry pie who encounters the trickster characters of Professor Scarecrow and Blackbird. 

In Disney's live action/animation film Song of the South (1946), James Baskett appears as Uncle Remus performing "Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah". This song is part of the film's retelling of Joel Chandler Harris's "Uncle Remus" tales (1881). These popular stories by a white author were represented as African American folktales, given voice through the character of Uncle Remus, a kindly old former slave. "Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah" is also based on the from the pre-Civil War folk song "Zip Coon," which was popularized by George Dixon in 1834.
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 30"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 17 of 17 Path end, continue

Related:  Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 45Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 190Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 230Race, Page 221Race, Page 206Space, Page 191Labor, Page 132Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 195Race, Page 229Performance, Page 60Race, Page 232Race, Page 239Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 119Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 143Labor, Page 112Space, Page 162Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 15Race, Page 248Introduction, Page 16Race, Page 225Space, Page 197Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 245Space, Page 165Space, Page 193Labor, Page 122Space, Page 194Performance, Page 40Race, Page 220Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 177Race, Page 258Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 4Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 187Space, Page 181Race, Page 251Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 253Space, Page 188Race, Page 231Space, Page 175Race, Page 254Labor, Page 131Space, Page 170Space, Page 183Space, Page 163Space, Page 150Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 304Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 35Space, Page 141Labor, Page 113Race, Page 213Space, Page 171Space, Page 178Race, Page 252Space, Page 182Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 54Space, Page 152Performance, Page 42Space, Page 138Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 123Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 72Race, Page 261Space, Page 184Performance, Page 34Race, Page 247Space, Page 189Race, Page 235Performance, Page 43Race, Page 219Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 155Labor, Page 88Race, Page 204Labor, Page 102Performance, Page 47