Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 30

The racist representation of African-Americans is marked by continuity and discontinuity. The minstrel did not necessarily disappear with the decline of blackface minstrelsy in the late 19th and early twentieth centuries. It faded from prominence, but was joined by more virulent and intense caricatures in the swing era. 

George Pal's Puppetoons (1932-47) used hand-carved dolls in stop-motion cartoons. This short, Jasper and the Haunted House, features several stereotypical representations of black people, particularly the main character Jasper, a "pickaninny" about to deliver a gooseberry pie who encounters the trickster characters of Professor Scarecrow and Blackbird. 

In Disney's live action/animation film Song of the South (1946), James Baskett appears as Uncle Remus performing "Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah". This song is part of the film's retelling of Joel Chandler Harris's "Uncle Remus" tales (1881). These popular stories by a white author were represented as African American folktales, given voice through the character of Uncle Remus, a kindly old former slave. "Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah" is also based on the from the pre-Civil War folk song "Zip Coon," which was popularized by George Dixon in 1834.
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 30"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 17 of 17 Path end, continue

Related:  Race, Page 224Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 183Race, Page 251Race, Page 252Race, Page 253Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 70Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 88Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 43Space, Page 163Race, Page 220Labor, Page 123Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 289Introduction, Page 16Race, Page 239Space, Page 178Race, Page 225Labor, Page 128Space, Page 141Performance, Page 50Space, Page 187Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 230Labor, Page 132Race, Page 235Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 35Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 40Performance, Page 77Space, Page 182Space, Page 175Space, Page 148Space, Page 171Space, Page 170Space, Page 181Space, Page 143Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 232Space, Page 177Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 52Performance, Page 54Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 119Race, Page 206Race, Page 213Labor, Page 109Space, Page 146Labor, Page 122Space, Page 191Space, Page 162Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 248Space, Page 195Space, Page 190Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 245Space, Page 193Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 44Space, Page 197Space, Page 138Labor, Page 129Space, Page 184Race, Page 247Labor, Page 113Labor, Page 112Race, Page 258Race, Page 229Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 254Space, Page 189Labor, Page 102Performance, Page 74Introduction, Page 26Performance, Page 42Space, Page 188Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 131Race, Page 204Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 47Introduction, Page 15Race, Page 219Space, Page 150Labor, Page 98Space, Page 152