Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 30

The racist representation of African-Americans is marked by continuity and discontinuity. The minstrel did not necessarily disappear with the decline of blackface minstrelsy in the late 19th and early twentieth centuries. It faded from prominence, but was joined by more virulent and intense caricatures in the swing era. 

George Pal's Puppetoons (1932-47) used hand-carved dolls in stop-motion cartoons. This short, Jasper and the Haunted House, features several stereotypical representations of black people, particularly the main character Jasper, a "pickaninny" about to deliver a gooseberry pie who encounters the trickster characters of Professor Scarecrow and Blackbird. 

In Disney's live action/animation film Song of the South (1946), James Baskett appears as Uncle Remus performing "Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah". This song is part of the film's retelling of Joel Chandler Harris's "Uncle Remus" tales (1881). These popular stories by a white author were represented as African American folktales, given voice through the character of Uncle Remus, a kindly old former slave. "Zip-a-Dee-Doo-Dah" is also based on the from the pre-Civil War folk song "Zip Coon," which was popularized by George Dixon in 1834.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 30"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 17 of 17 Path end, continue

Related:  Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 128Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 21Performance, Page 70Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 224Space, Page 138Space, Page 191Labor, Page 122Space, Page 184Space, Page 197Space, Page 162Race, Page 230Performance, Page 47Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 165Performance, Page 41Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 131Space, Page 178Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 102Space, Page 170Performance, Page 54Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 72Race, Page 248Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 52Performance, Page 40Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 46Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 14Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 42Space, Page 172Race, Page 220Labor, Page 132Space, Page 182Race, Page 221Race, Page 206Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 141Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 34Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 232Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 258Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 84Race, Page 229Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 119Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 194Space, Page 143Introduction, Page 2Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 163Race, Page 245Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 16Labor, Page 98Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 45Space, Page 177Labor, Page 88Race, Page 247Space, Page 190Space, Page 187Space, Page 188Space, Page 175Labor, Page 110Race, Page 219Space, Page 146Labor, Page 123Introduction, Page 15Race, Page 225Labor, Page 133Space, Page 181Space, Page 137Space, Page 150Space, Page 189Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 50Space, Page 171Race, Page 213Race, Page 239Space, Page 155Race, Page 204Space, Page 152Performance, Page 35