Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Space, page 20 of 36

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Space, Page 175

As sound films became popular in the late 1920s and 30s, cartoons were increasingly presented as containing sound, rather than merely accompanied by music and sound effects.

Both Amateur Nite (1929) and The Opry House (1929) use the theatre as a narrative frame for non-diegetic music, a background of sound. This framing technique for  sound soon gave way to the use of diegetic sound in cartoons. That is, sound and music changed from being a background to the action of the cartoon, to become something that the characters could hear and contribute to. 

In Amateur Nite, Oswald the Lucky Rabbit goes to a stage show and sees acts performed by animal characters with distinctly black bodies and white lips, a visual reminder of the role of blackface minstrelsy in vaudeville and in animation. Similarly, The Opry House depicts Mickey Mouse going to a show and performing three acts: snake-charming, an impression of a Hasidic Jew, and a piano solo. 

Bimbo's Initiation (1931) differed from past Fleischer cartoons that often played with the relationship between flat, 2-D drawn space and "real" cinematic space. In this cartoon Bimbo gets sucked into a manhole and ends up in a fantastic unified cinematic space that is shifting and unstable. 

Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Space, Page 175"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Space, page 20 of 36 Next page on path

Related:  Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 155Space, Page 178Race, Page 225Space, Page 188Labor, Page 133Space, Page 181Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 220Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 44Space, Page 162Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 112Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 132Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 189Race, Page 213Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 204Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 50Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 165Space, Page 190Space, Page 193Race, Page 230Labor, Page 113Labor, Page 88Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 122Race, Page 254Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 76Race, Page 251Space, Page 150Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 74Space, Page 148Labor, Page 131Space, Page 143Labor, Page 96Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 47Space, Page 172Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 128Race, Page 248Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 45Race, Page 235Space, Page 171Space, Page 166Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 54Race, Page 221Labor, Page 93Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 229Race, Page 232Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 239Race, Page 247Race, Page 231Labor, Page 110Space, Page 137Space, Page 191Race, Page 224Race, Page 258Space, Page 187Space, Page 159Labor, Page 119Space, Page 183Space, Page 184Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 182Labor, Page 123Race, Page 252Performance, Page 34Space, Page 170Space, Page 138Space, Page 195Labor, Page 102Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 97Conclusion, Page 268Performance, Page 46Space, Page 194Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 242Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 156Labor, Page 101Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 115Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 219Race, Page 261Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 169Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 141Performance, Page 41