Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 247Race, Page 230Performance, Page 82Race, Page 224Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 47Space, Page 178Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 88Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 72Space, Page 182Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 122Space, Page 177Space, Page 150Race, Page 225Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 146Space, Page 172Labor, Page 133Space, Page 194Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 50Space, Page 193Race, Page 220Race, Page 232Space, Page 181Performance, Page 35Race, Page 248Performance, Page 45Space, Page 155Performance, Page 34Race, Page 229Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 138Space, Page 148Race, Page 252Race, Page 231Race, Page 204Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 112Space, Page 162Space, Page 191Race, Page 213Labor, Page 132Space, Page 165Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 219Race, Page 221Labor, Page 110Space, Page 183Space, Page 184Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 175Race, Page 239Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 188Space, Page 141Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 46Space, Page 187Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 197Performance, Page 77Space, Page 196Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 52Space, Page 190Labor, Page 101Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 163Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 143Space, Page 170Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 261Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 131Space, Page 137Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 245Conclusion, Page 284