Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 197Space, Page 191Labor, Page 119Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 72Race, Page 220Space, Page 146Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 109Race, Page 229Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 252Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 46Space, Page 196Space, Page 184Introduction, Page 16Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 225Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 231Race, Page 247Space, Page 194Space, Page 165Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 50Space, Page 182Race, Page 206Labor, Page 110Race, Page 248Race, Page 221Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 291Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 41Space, Page 150Performance, Page 82Space, Page 175Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 128Space, Page 177Performance, Page 34Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 141Space, Page 162Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 171Space, Page 143Space, Page 137Performance, Page 42Space, Page 187Race, Page 224Race, Page 239Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 44Space, Page 155Race, Page 251Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 101Space, Page 188Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 47Race, Page 230Space, Page 193Space, Page 152Labor, Page 113Race, Page 258Space, Page 181Space, Page 163Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 189Race, Page 261Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 43Race, Page 204Race, Page 219Space, Page 178Race, Page 254Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 195Race, Page 235Space, Page 183Space, Page 148Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 138Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 170Race, Page 245Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 303Conclusion, Page 273