Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 146Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 163Space, Page 175Space, Page 148Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 178Race, Page 231Space, Page 150Introduction, Page 2Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 188Performance, Page 42Race, Page 253Space, Page 155Race, Page 220Space, Page 141Labor, Page 112Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 213Race, Page 225Performance, Page 45Space, Page 177Performance, Page 52Race, Page 235Space, Page 190Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 119Space, Page 138Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 181Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 132Space, Page 193Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 184Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 182Race, Page 251Race, Page 229Performance, Page 46Space, Page 165Space, Page 196Introduction, Page 26Race, Page 224Race, Page 248Performance, Page 50Space, Page 170Labor, Page 133Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 206Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 239Performance, Page 84Space, Page 191Space, Page 162Labor, Page 101Space, Page 152Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 296Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 247Labor, Page 131Race, Page 204Space, Page 195Space, Page 189Space, Page 171Space, Page 187Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 122Race, Page 254Performance, Page 41Space, Page 172Space, Page 143Race, Page 230Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 72Race, Page 221Space, Page 183Race, Page 245Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 258Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 74Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 16Performance, Page 43