Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 183Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 188Performance, Page 45Space, Page 172Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 122Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 291Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 74Race, Page 231Race, Page 239Space, Page 187Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 70Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 138Labor, Page 119Race, Page 230Performance, Page 72Race, Page 213Space, Page 155Labor, Page 128Race, Page 229Space, Page 143Labor, Page 113Race, Page 206Space, Page 181Race, Page 253Race, Page 224Performance, Page 82Space, Page 195Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 182Space, Page 178Space, Page 184Performance, Page 84Space, Page 162Race, Page 219Space, Page 190Race, Page 225Space, Page 189Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 44Space, Page 194Space, Page 197Space, Page 191Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 245Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 50Space, Page 150Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 221Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 46Space, Page 193Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 261Performance, Page 60Space, Page 165Race, Page 254Race, Page 232Space, Page 171Space, Page 141Labor, Page 98Space, Page 148Space, Page 146Space, Page 175Labor, Page 112Race, Page 235Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 54Race, Page 258Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 133Space, Page 163Labor, Page 129Space, Page 137Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 247Race, Page 248Introduction, Page 16Race, Page 204Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 101Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 196