Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 47Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 98Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 253Space, Page 162Labor, Page 112Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 220Space, Page 146Space, Page 197Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 133Race, Page 231Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 122Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 50Space, Page 150Space, Page 138Space, Page 181Space, Page 175Race, Page 225Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 289Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 141Labor, Page 128Space, Page 183Race, Page 206Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 119Race, Page 239Labor, Page 109Race, Page 245Space, Page 155Race, Page 230Race, Page 247Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 35Space, Page 171Space, Page 170Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 194Space, Page 165Space, Page 189Labor, Page 113Space, Page 184Performance, Page 70Space, Page 196Labor, Page 123Space, Page 178Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 137Performance, Page 41Race, Page 224Performance, Page 77Race, Page 235Race, Page 229Space, Page 172Race, Page 204Space, Page 190Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 188Performance, Page 46Space, Page 177Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 101Introduction, Page 26Race, Page 213Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 129Space, Page 163Race, Page 248Space, Page 193Space, Page 195Race, Page 258Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 88Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 300Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 45Introduction, Page 16Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 131Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 143Race, Page 219Performance, Page 34Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 303