Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 206Labor, Page 128Space, Page 162Race, Page 224Space, Page 184Space, Page 188Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 109Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 152Labor, Page 119Race, Page 251Race, Page 219Space, Page 155Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 133Space, Page 193Space, Page 183Space, Page 177Performance, Page 50Labor, Page 132Space, Page 196Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 254Space, Page 171Space, Page 172Space, Page 190Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 197Performance, Page 35Space, Page 150Race, Page 239Race, Page 231Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 45Introduction, Page 16Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 98Race, Page 225Performance, Page 77Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 163Race, Page 232Space, Page 175Race, Page 247Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 189Race, Page 230Space, Page 165Labor, Page 110Space, Page 141Space, Page 178Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 82Space, Page 191Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 30Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 72Space, Page 146Space, Page 181Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 229Race, Page 245Race, Page 220Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 34Space, Page 195Race, Page 221Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 52Space, Page 194Space, Page 170Labor, Page 123Race, Page 213Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 54Race, Page 253Labor, Page 88Race, Page 261Space, Page 143Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 248Space, Page 187Performance, Page 46Space, Page 148Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 43Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 101Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 278