Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 14Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 47Race, Page 229Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 220Labor, Page 110Space, Page 194Space, Page 187Space, Page 163Performance, Page 74Space, Page 177Space, Page 188Race, Page 261Space, Page 162Space, Page 172Performance, Page 60Space, Page 146Labor, Page 122Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 119Race, Page 235Space, Page 190Race, Page 251Labor, Page 112Space, Page 175Space, Page 189Race, Page 221Performance, Page 35Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 2Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 182Race, Page 224Space, Page 143Race, Page 252Race, Page 258Space, Page 181Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 16Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 50Race, Page 232Race, Page 206Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 88Race, Page 245Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 123Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 230Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 150Race, Page 253Space, Page 165Race, Page 213Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 225Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 129Race, Page 248Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 46Race, Page 204Race, Page 231Race, Page 254Race, Page 239Performance, Page 77Race, Page 219Space, Page 141Race, Page 247Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 152Space, Page 171Performance, Page 52Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 138Space, Page 184Space, Page 137Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 34Space, Page 196Introduction, Page 1Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 303