Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 152Race, Page 221Race, Page 229Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 275Labor, Page 88Space, Page 184Race, Page 230Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 213Space, Page 162Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 119Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 254Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 193Space, Page 182Space, Page 194Performance, Page 44Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 82Space, Page 197Race, Page 220Performance, Page 45Race, Page 239Race, Page 235Space, Page 188Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 225Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 187Race, Page 206Space, Page 181Labor, Page 113Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 50Race, Page 247Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 122Race, Page 252Space, Page 171Performance, Page 60Space, Page 177Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 261Space, Page 195Performance, Page 52Race, Page 204Performance, Page 46Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 224Performance, Page 74Space, Page 150Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 98Space, Page 170Space, Page 175Space, Page 189Race, Page 258Space, Page 163Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 112Space, Page 137Labor, Page 110Space, Page 138Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 245Race, Page 248Race, Page 251Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 133Space, Page 191Performance, Page 47Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 35Space, Page 155Introduction, Page 16Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 41Space, Page 196Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 143Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 43Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 131Space, Page 141