Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 74Race, Page 232Space, Page 155Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 82Race, Page 251Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 70Space, Page 146Space, Page 197Space, Page 188Labor, Page 119Space, Page 182Space, Page 181Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 224Race, Page 221Space, Page 172Performance, Page 41Race, Page 261Race, Page 225Labor, Page 132Space, Page 141Space, Page 193Race, Page 252Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 219Race, Page 206Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 165Performance, Page 50Introduction, Page 26Labor, Page 133Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 110Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 220Labor, Page 123Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 184Race, Page 258Space, Page 177Race, Page 254Labor, Page 129Space, Page 143Space, Page 195Space, Page 191Labor, Page 112Race, Page 239Race, Page 253Performance, Page 34Introduction, Page 2Introduction, Page 16Space, Page 187Performance, Page 47Space, Page 196Space, Page 178Race, Page 235Race, Page 204Space, Page 190Race, Page 230Performance, Page 54Space, Page 148Space, Page 170Labor, Page 122Race, Page 247Space, Page 175Performance, Page 52Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 138Space, Page 137Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 101Race, Page 248Labor, Page 98Space, Page 183Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 60Space, Page 150Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 45Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 152Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 46Race, Page 245Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 43Space, Page 171