Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 123Race, Page 213Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 50Labor, Page 132Race, Page 204Space, Page 193Space, Page 187Space, Page 190Space, Page 177Race, Page 225Race, Page 231Race, Page 220Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 110Space, Page 181Race, Page 239Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 88Race, Page 206Race, Page 224Labor, Page 122Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 23Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 188Space, Page 146Space, Page 175Space, Page 197Space, Page 170Space, Page 152Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 77Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 84Space, Page 162Space, Page 194Race, Page 245Performance, Page 82Space, Page 196Race, Page 251Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 304Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 52Space, Page 191Space, Page 155Race, Page 254Performance, Page 44Race, Page 253Performance, Page 60Space, Page 172Performance, Page 72Space, Page 138Performance, Page 34Space, Page 141Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 101Space, Page 143Space, Page 184Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 45Introduction, Page 6Introduction, Page 14Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 171Performance, Page 70Race, Page 219Performance, Page 41Space, Page 178Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 275Labor, Page 133Space, Page 165Race, Page 230Space, Page 163Space, Page 137Race, Page 247Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 291Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 195Race, Page 252Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 229Performance, Page 46Race, Page 261Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 128Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 150Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 286