Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 247Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 289Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 194Space, Page 181Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 43Race, Page 221Space, Page 197Space, Page 146Race, Page 224Space, Page 170Performance, Page 35Space, Page 155Labor, Page 133Space, Page 193Labor, Page 98Race, Page 225Race, Page 232Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 72Race, Page 230Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 175Performance, Page 47Race, Page 258Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 77Space, Page 141Space, Page 138Space, Page 188Labor, Page 123Race, Page 220Race, Page 219Performance, Page 50Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 251Performance, Page 74Race, Page 231Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 163Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 190Race, Page 235Space, Page 177Race, Page 239Space, Page 152Space, Page 148Space, Page 187Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 162Labor, Page 128Race, Page 261Space, Page 189Race, Page 245Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 60Space, Page 165Labor, Page 112Space, Page 150Space, Page 172Space, Page 183Race, Page 252Labor, Page 129Race, Page 204Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 132Race, Page 248Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 137Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 298Introduction, Page 6Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 191Performance, Page 46Space, Page 196Space, Page 178Performance, Page 82Space, Page 184Labor, Page 101Labor, Page 131Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 253Labor, Page 113Space, Page 195Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 171Race, Page 213Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 26Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 278