Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 193Race, Page 239Labor, Page 123Race, Page 204Space, Page 172Space, Page 178Race, Page 229Space, Page 183Race, Page 230Space, Page 177Performance, Page 77Space, Page 197Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 50Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 188Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 175Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 122Space, Page 181Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 119Space, Page 165Space, Page 184Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 252Space, Page 162Race, Page 213Labor, Page 112Space, Page 143Space, Page 189Space, Page 155Space, Page 187Performance, Page 72Race, Page 232Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 225Labor, Page 110Space, Page 194Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 47Space, Page 182Race, Page 261Performance, Page 35Race, Page 253Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 248Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 220Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 146Space, Page 196Performance, Page 52Race, Page 231Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 219Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 74Space, Page 150Performance, Page 54Space, Page 148Race, Page 247Space, Page 170Race, Page 245Race, Page 224Performance, Page 45Space, Page 195Performance, Page 46Space, Page 171Race, Page 206Labor, Page 132Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 41Space, Page 163Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 44Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 138Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 191Space, Page 137Race, Page 221Race, Page 235Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 152Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 275Labor, Page 101