Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 172Performance, Page 50Space, Page 194Labor, Page 109Space, Page 183Race, Page 229Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 74Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 239Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 193Space, Page 191Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 178Space, Page 152Race, Page 220Labor, Page 88Space, Page 138Space, Page 187Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 54Space, Page 190Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 162Performance, Page 47Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 252Space, Page 143Race, Page 251Performance, Page 82Race, Page 224Space, Page 195Labor, Page 132Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 258Space, Page 165Space, Page 182Race, Page 221Labor, Page 98Space, Page 181Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 261Labor, Page 119Space, Page 171Race, Page 254Race, Page 204Race, Page 231Labor, Page 101Conclusion, Page 304Introduction, Page 16Race, Page 247Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 206Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 52Space, Page 170Space, Page 197Performance, Page 41Race, Page 253Space, Page 148Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 44Space, Page 141Labor, Page 131Space, Page 189Performance, Page 72Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 45Space, Page 184Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 146Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 60Race, Page 219Space, Page 177Space, Page 188Performance, Page 34Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 155Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 43Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 245Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 42Space, Page 196Performance, Page 70Space, Page 137Race, Page 248