Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Labor, Page 128Race, Page 224Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 187Race, Page 232Space, Page 178Labor, Page 112Space, Page 162Race, Page 239Space, Page 152Space, Page 146Labor, Page 88Race, Page 229Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 254Performance, Page 47Space, Page 190Space, Page 177Race, Page 225Performance, Page 82Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 252Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 247Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 44Race, Page 221Space, Page 194Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 170Race, Page 231Race, Page 253Race, Page 258Space, Page 141Race, Page 245Space, Page 184Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 165Space, Page 150Space, Page 148Performance, Page 52Race, Page 251Performance, Page 70Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 172Space, Page 191Space, Page 195Space, Page 181Race, Page 206Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 261Labor, Page 98Space, Page 197Space, Page 175Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 122Race, Page 220Space, Page 188Performance, Page 35Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 189Space, Page 155Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 74Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 34Introduction, Page 26Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 171Performance, Page 43Space, Page 143Race, Page 213Race, Page 248Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 113Race, Page 219Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 101Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 129Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 235Performance, Page 41Race, Page 230Space, Page 137Space, Page 138Introduction, Page 16Space, Page 196