Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 254Space, Page 182Space, Page 175Race, Page 220Performance, Page 47Space, Page 177Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 88Race, Page 253Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 184Race, Page 219Performance, Page 72Space, Page 187Space, Page 162Race, Page 232Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 119Race, Page 258Race, Page 229Performance, Page 52Space, Page 150Space, Page 188Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 30Performance, Page 44Race, Page 230Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 183Race, Page 224Race, Page 225Race, Page 248Race, Page 231Race, Page 239Space, Page 178Performance, Page 50Performance, Page 84Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 251Labor, Page 113Space, Page 148Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 6Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 45Space, Page 181Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 98Labor, Page 123Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 291Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 252Race, Page 213Space, Page 194Labor, Page 122Space, Page 172Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 110Space, Page 163Performance, Page 35Space, Page 189Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 165Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 74Space, Page 138Labor, Page 133Race, Page 245Race, Page 235Race, Page 247Race, Page 261Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 54Space, Page 141Introduction, Page 2Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 143Labor, Page 128Space, Page 195Space, Page 191Space, Page 190Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 197Space, Page 170Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 204Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 101Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 171Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 196Labor, Page 131