Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 128Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 155Race, Page 247Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 150Space, Page 191Race, Page 239Performance, Page 34Space, Page 184Performance, Page 45Space, Page 163Labor, Page 98Space, Page 162Performance, Page 47Race, Page 252Race, Page 224Space, Page 182Space, Page 172Space, Page 177Performance, Page 42Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 122Race, Page 230Space, Page 175Performance, Page 52Space, Page 194Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 129Race, Page 248Space, Page 146Space, Page 181Performance, Page 44Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 251Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 232Space, Page 195Space, Page 148Space, Page 178Space, Page 188Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 229Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 132Space, Page 197Performance, Page 77Race, Page 253Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 50Race, Page 219Labor, Page 123Space, Page 170Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 84Space, Page 171Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 187Race, Page 220Space, Page 141Space, Page 152Race, Page 206Space, Page 190Race, Page 204Race, Page 245Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 72Space, Page 143Space, Page 138Race, Page 225Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 196Labor, Page 131Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 74Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 193Race, Page 213Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 43Introduction, Page 4Introduction, Page 16Race, Page 261