Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 141Performance, Page 52Performance, Page 50Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 109Race, Page 258Space, Page 187Race, Page 235Performance, Page 47Space, Page 148Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 184Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 296Labor, Page 98Race, Page 252Space, Page 162Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 45Space, Page 189Space, Page 170Labor, Page 88Race, Page 251Race, Page 253Labor, Page 110Space, Page 177Race, Page 206Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 194Performance, Page 74Race, Page 219Space, Page 193Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 183Performance, Page 84Race, Page 239Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 225Space, Page 178Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 231Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 229Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 163Space, Page 175Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 197Space, Page 146Space, Page 138Space, Page 181Space, Page 182Labor, Page 123Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 82Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 155Race, Page 224Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 119Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 220Race, Page 261Labor, Page 101Race, Page 254Labor, Page 129Space, Page 191Race, Page 245Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 131Space, Page 143Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 34Race, Page 247Space, Page 137Space, Page 196Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 16Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 113Space, Page 171Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 43Space, Page 188Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 70Race, Page 248Space, Page 190Performance, Page 41