Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 221Performance, Page 50Labor, Page 123Space, Page 183Space, Page 181Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 188Space, Page 177Labor, Page 112Space, Page 165Race, Page 239Race, Page 247Labor, Page 132Space, Page 187Race, Page 224Space, Page 141Performance, Page 44Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 182Race, Page 258Labor, Page 133Space, Page 150Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 128Race, Page 213Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 72Race, Page 252Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 229Race, Page 248Performance, Page 84Space, Page 190Race, Page 220Labor, Page 110Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 82Space, Page 172Race, Page 231Race, Page 206Space, Page 162Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 152Space, Page 194Race, Page 235Space, Page 191Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 42Race, Page 225Performance, Page 35Space, Page 171Race, Page 254Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 74Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 109Space, Page 146Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 129Space, Page 184Space, Page 178Space, Page 148Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 70Race, Page 219Labor, Page 131Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 52Space, Page 163Race, Page 253Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 143Performance, Page 54Space, Page 197Space, Page 155Race, Page 245Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 101Race, Page 204Space, Page 195Performance, Page 43Space, Page 138Space, Page 137Space, Page 196Introduction, Page 26