Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 194Performance, Page 44Race, Page 253Race, Page 261Race, Page 229Race, Page 254Performance, Page 50Space, Page 187Race, Page 230Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 150Labor, Page 128Race, Page 251Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 232Space, Page 143Performance, Page 74Space, Page 163Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 152Race, Page 225Space, Page 193Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 84Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 182Labor, Page 123Space, Page 175Performance, Page 45Space, Page 146Space, Page 165Race, Page 239Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 204Space, Page 188Labor, Page 110Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 155Space, Page 162Race, Page 247Performance, Page 35Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 220Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 109Race, Page 206Space, Page 171Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 197Performance, Page 72Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 46Race, Page 248Space, Page 178Space, Page 148Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 60Space, Page 184Race, Page 235Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 16Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 26Race, Page 224Race, Page 221Space, Page 191Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 141Space, Page 183Race, Page 213Space, Page 138Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 42Space, Page 172Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 181Performance, Page 41Space, Page 190Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 296Labor, Page 131Race, Page 219Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 101Space, Page 196Labor, Page 132Space, Page 195Race, Page 245Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 300Introduction, Page 23Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 137