Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 220Labor, Page 133Race, Page 229Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 23Introduction, Page 26Race, Page 206Performance, Page 50Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 275Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 101Space, Page 150Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 239Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 289Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 148Space, Page 177Labor, Page 132Race, Page 252Performance, Page 72Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 224Space, Page 162Race, Page 221Race, Page 253Race, Page 204Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 193Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 84Race, Page 247Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 232Space, Page 178Space, Page 183Race, Page 230Space, Page 190Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 187Space, Page 172Space, Page 188Space, Page 194Race, Page 258Race, Page 225Labor, Page 113Race, Page 248Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 119Space, Page 155Space, Page 146Space, Page 141Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 181Performance, Page 82Space, Page 196Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 165Performance, Page 44Space, Page 163Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 170Performance, Page 46Space, Page 182Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 129Space, Page 152Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 54Race, Page 261Race, Page 235Space, Page 171Labor, Page 112Race, Page 213Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 131Race, Page 219Performance, Page 35Labor, Page 128Space, Page 138Space, Page 195Performance, Page 60Space, Page 143Space, Page 184Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 137Performance, Page 43Race, Page 245Introduction, Page 4