Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 230Performance, Page 50Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 82Race, Page 225Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 112Race, Page 206Performance, Page 42Space, Page 148Labor, Page 110Space, Page 162Labor, Page 133Race, Page 251Performance, Page 46Space, Page 182Performance, Page 47Race, Page 221Race, Page 224Performance, Page 74Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 150Labor, Page 113Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 229Race, Page 220Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 190Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 165Space, Page 177Race, Page 231Performance, Page 35Space, Page 191Race, Page 239Space, Page 181Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 193Performance, Page 60Race, Page 232Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 70Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 122Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 123Race, Page 254Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 45Space, Page 188Race, Page 219Race, Page 253Race, Page 247Performance, Page 43Space, Page 178Performance, Page 54Space, Page 187Race, Page 235Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 289Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 245Labor, Page 131Space, Page 194Performance, Page 52Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 152Performance, Page 72Space, Page 138Space, Page 183Labor, Page 128Space, Page 184Race, Page 261Space, Page 195Labor, Page 119Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 132Space, Page 163Space, Page 141Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 204Space, Page 137Space, Page 143Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 252Race, Page 213Introduction, Page 16Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 170Space, Page 196Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 273