Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 183Space, Page 150Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 188Performance, Page 70Space, Page 146Labor, Page 133Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 54Space, Page 190Race, Page 231Labor, Page 88Space, Page 189Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 187Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 230Performance, Page 41Race, Page 247Labor, Page 132Race, Page 229Labor, Page 109Space, Page 170Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 239Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 42Race, Page 232Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 35Race, Page 261Race, Page 225Race, Page 220Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 74Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 163Race, Page 219Labor, Page 119Space, Page 193Labor, Page 112Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 184Space, Page 155Space, Page 177Race, Page 204Space, Page 152Race, Page 224Space, Page 148Performance, Page 82Space, Page 178Labor, Page 98Race, Page 258Space, Page 138Space, Page 162Performance, Page 45Space, Page 171Labor, Page 110Race, Page 221Performance, Page 72Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 165Performance, Page 77Race, Page 206Space, Page 181Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 194Space, Page 141Labor, Page 131Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 123Race, Page 248Race, Page 254Space, Page 175Space, Page 143Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 50Space, Page 191Race, Page 252Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 245Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 137Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 213Labor, Page 113Space, Page 196Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 195Race, Page 235Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 26