Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 253Labor, Page 88Space, Page 172Space, Page 195Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 30Performance, Page 35Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 110Race, Page 252Introduction, Page 16Space, Page 177Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 42Space, Page 197Labor, Page 112Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 26Race, Page 232Labor, Page 98Race, Page 247Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 119Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 224Space, Page 181Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 245Space, Page 194Space, Page 187Space, Page 190Space, Page 191Race, Page 258Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 225Space, Page 171Race, Page 248Race, Page 251Race, Page 239Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 74Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 60Race, Page 261Space, Page 141Space, Page 184Space, Page 196Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 182Space, Page 143Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 221Space, Page 193Space, Page 183Space, Page 138Performance, Page 50Space, Page 148Race, Page 230Space, Page 178Race, Page 206Space, Page 146Performance, Page 44Space, Page 165Race, Page 213Race, Page 219Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 70Space, Page 188Space, Page 137Space, Page 170Performance, Page 45Race, Page 231Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 303Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 34Space, Page 163Race, Page 229Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 132Space, Page 175Race, Page 204Race, Page 235Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 41