Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 148Space, Page 197Performance, Page 50Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 112Race, Page 239Space, Page 193Race, Page 206Performance, Page 45Space, Page 152Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 170Performance, Page 84Space, Page 191Labor, Page 110Race, Page 230Space, Page 175Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 82Space, Page 187Race, Page 247Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 219Space, Page 188Labor, Page 113Space, Page 181Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 143Labor, Page 119Race, Page 258Space, Page 190Labor, Page 122Space, Page 162Performance, Page 74Race, Page 224Space, Page 138Race, Page 261Space, Page 184Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 150Space, Page 178Race, Page 252Performance, Page 42Race, Page 229Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 231Race, Page 253Space, Page 146Space, Page 137Labor, Page 123Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 232Space, Page 196Performance, Page 47Space, Page 194Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 304Introduction, Page 16Labor, Page 98Space, Page 177Race, Page 220Race, Page 251Performance, Page 60Space, Page 195Labor, Page 132Space, Page 171Labor, Page 133Space, Page 189Space, Page 155Race, Page 235Performance, Page 35Race, Page 204Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 128Space, Page 172Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 213Race, Page 245Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 141Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 43Space, Page 163Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 26