Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 50Space, Page 189Space, Page 175Performance, Page 42Space, Page 150Performance, Page 45Space, Page 155Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 112Space, Page 193Space, Page 143Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 109Space, Page 170Space, Page 141Space, Page 162Race, Page 252Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 119Race, Page 225Space, Page 181Space, Page 188Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 123Space, Page 184Labor, Page 131Space, Page 138Race, Page 247Race, Page 232Introduction, Page 4Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 152Space, Page 182Performance, Page 43Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 187Performance, Page 74Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 163Race, Page 224Space, Page 197Labor, Page 128Race, Page 239Race, Page 261Labor, Page 133Space, Page 177Race, Page 253Race, Page 248Space, Page 190Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 148Race, Page 254Space, Page 171Space, Page 137Race, Page 229Performance, Page 52Space, Page 178Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 195Performance, Page 34Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 54Space, Page 191Race, Page 219Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 206Introduction, Page 26Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 129Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 204Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 194Labor, Page 101Race, Page 213Race, Page 258Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 245Space, Page 196Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 1