Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 10 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 112

The background of the Sullivan short Felix Dopes It Out (1924) demonstrates the schematic simplicity by which a few lines can represent an outdoor scene. An economy of line allowed animators to work quickly and efficiently, and the fewer lines a background contained, the easier it was to mass reproduce and even reuse. 

Similarly, Felix Out of Luck (1924) shows how few lines are required to create an indoor scene, efficiently reprising the basic iconography of the vaudeville backdrop. Technical and material constraints forced animators to develop a set of representational conventions which coalesced across different studios and product lines over time in the early American animation industry. 


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 112"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 10 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 165Race, Page 248Space, Page 190Space, Page 182Space, Page 143Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 82Space, Page 178Race, Page 204Space, Page 138Race, Page 221Performance, Page 84Space, Page 148Space, Page 163Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 194Race, Page 230Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 169Space, Page 146Labor, Page 133Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 175Race, Page 232Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 231Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 225Race, Page 254Space, Page 181Race, Page 239Space, Page 152Space, Page 162Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 101Race, Page 247Performance, Page 50Space, Page 177Race, Page 224Labor, Page 132Race, Page 235Space, Page 189Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 188Performance, Page 45Space, Page 197Labor, Page 115Space, Page 187Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 42Introduction, Page 1Introduction, Page 21Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 252Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 113Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 213Space, Page 155Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 52Race, Page 206Labor, Page 129Race, Page 258Race, Page 229Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 54Space, Page 195Performance, Page 47Space, Page 159Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 80Race, Page 251Performance, Page 43Space, Page 170Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 41Race, Page 261Space, Page 183Space, Page 191Space, Page 184Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 268Performance, Page 60Space, Page 156Space, Page 166Labor, Page 102Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 242Labor, Page 93Performance, Page 76Performance, Page 46