Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 235Race, Page 247Race, Page 258Space, Page 190Space, Page 188Space, Page 197Space, Page 193Space, Page 146Performance, Page 50Race, Page 204Labor, Page 133Space, Page 189Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 122Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 35Space, Page 141Labor, Page 132Race, Page 251Space, Page 187Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 170Labor, Page 96Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 253Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 248Performance, Page 82Race, Page 239Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 93Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 220Labor, Page 109Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 12Space, Page 166Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 102Performance, Page 76Labor, Page 112Race, Page 219Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 56Performance, Page 78Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 268Race, Page 213Race, Page 231Performance, Page 40Race, Page 242Labor, Page 119Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 224Race, Page 232Race, Page 229Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 26Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 178Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 150Space, Page 191Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 44Space, Page 175Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 152Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 230Performance, Page 84Space, Page 156Race, Page 225Performance, Page 47Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 98Space, Page 159Introduction, Page 20Space, Page 194Performance, Page 77Race, Page 261Race, Page 221Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 123Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 155Space, Page 177Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 62Performance, Page 72Space, Page 165Race, Page 252Labor, Page 110Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 67Space, Page 172Space, Page 169Space, Page 184Space, Page 195Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 18Space, Page 138Space, Page 192Conclusion, Page 274Space, Page 171introduction-page-22Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 70Space, Page 137Space, Page 181Labor, Page 97Race, Page 245Labor, Page 126Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 272Race, Page 257Performance, Page 80Space, Page 183