Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 230Race, Page 220Race, Page 254Space, Page 175Performance, Page 56Race, Page 231Race, Page 206Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 76Performance, Page 35Space, Page 137Space, Page 190Race, Page 239Race, Page 261Race, Page 224Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 102Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 14Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 165Performance, Page 42Race, Page 247Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 40Labor, Page 113Space, Page 156Space, Page 146Performance, Page 72Race, Page 252Space, Page 155Introduction, Page 9Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 44Race, Page 242Introduction, Page 18Performance, Page 70Race, Page 221Performance, Page 52Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 93Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 296Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 204Space, Page 189Space, Page 193Space, Page 152Performance, Page 62Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 96Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 122Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 268Race, Page 251Performance, Page 46Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 41Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 12Space, Page 194Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 54Space, Page 192Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 187Space, Page 162Space, Page 197Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 191Race, Page 229Space, Page 178Race, Page 258Race, Page 245Space, Page 188Space, Page 138Space, Page 171Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 84Race, Page 235Performance, Page 67Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 143Space, Page 195Space, Page 170Performance, Page 80Labor, Page 97introduction-page-22Labor, Page 132Space, Page 181Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 169Race, Page 232Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 166Space, Page 159Labor, Page 126Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 78Race, Page 248Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 177Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 272Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 20Space, Page 184Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 274Race, Page 257