Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 76Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 178Introduction, Page 21Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 62Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 190Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 110Space, Page 138Space, Page 159Space, Page 141Race, Page 220Race, Page 230Space, Page 187Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 18Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 163Labor, Page 98Space, Page 156Race, Page 257Space, Page 193Space, Page 150Race, Page 239Race, Page 254Race, Page 225Space, Page 152Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 12Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 56Race, Page 231Performance, Page 70Race, Page 247Labor, Page 113Labor, Page 109Race, Page 204Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 35Space, Page 148Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 272Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 245Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 132Race, Page 251Race, Page 253Performance, Page 67Performance, Page 34Introduction, Page 1Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 80Labor, Page 102Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 52Race, Page 224Space, Page 189Space, Page 182Race, Page 206Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 46Race, Page 221Space, Page 197Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 96Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 268Space, Page 169Space, Page 194Space, Page 171Space, Page 165Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 97Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 82Race, Page 242Space, Page 177Introduction, Page 30Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 45Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 235Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 78Space, Page 137Space, Page 195Performance, Page 50Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 143Performance, Page 44Space, Page 191Labor, Page 131Race, Page 248Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 252Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 20Race, Page 213Space, Page 166Space, Page 184Labor, Page 129Race, Page 258Performance, Page 41Space, Page 162introduction-page-22Space, Page 188Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 133Space, Page 181Performance, Page 40Labor, Page 126Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 274Race, Page 219Space, Page 192Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 303