Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 162Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 138Performance, Page 78Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 261Space, Page 169Race, Page 239Labor, Page 132Race, Page 253Race, Page 254Race, Page 252Space, Page 188Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 133Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 76Labor, Page 97Space, Page 172Space, Page 155Performance, Page 46Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 42Space, Page 143Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 9Race, Page 247Race, Page 221Space, Page 182introduction-page-22Space, Page 152Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 50Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 47Space, Page 170Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 123Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 206Race, Page 229Space, Page 146Space, Page 189Labor, Page 128Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 165Performance, Page 35Space, Page 195Race, Page 235Labor, Page 102Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 298Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 77Space, Page 171Space, Page 163Space, Page 178Space, Page 183Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 41Space, Page 193Labor, Page 96Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 258Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 82Race, Page 232Race, Page 220Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 122Race, Page 251Space, Page 166Space, Page 137Race, Page 231Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 12Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 300Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 194Space, Page 175Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 43Space, Page 181Performance, Page 80Performance, Page 52Race, Page 225Space, Page 190Race, Page 257Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 56Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 268Space, Page 192Space, Page 141Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 93Introduction, Page 26Race, Page 248Space, Page 156Race, Page 242Race, Page 245Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 191Space, Page 197Space, Page 159Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 126Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 204Labor, Page 131Conclusion, Page 274Performance, Page 70Race, Page 213Performance, Page 67Introduction, Page 20Conclusion, Page 272Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 62Introduction, Page 18Performance, Page 40Space, Page 184