Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 230Race, Page 206Space, Page 159Space, Page 175Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 190Performance, Page 45Introduction, Page 9Labor, Page 102Space, Page 177Race, Page 220Space, Page 187Race, Page 242Space, Page 193Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 182Space, Page 172Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 254Race, Page 232Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 166Race, Page 225Space, Page 194Space, Page 184Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 82Space, Page 152Space, Page 141Race, Page 224Performance, Page 80Space, Page 189Labor, Page 112Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 84Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 268Performance, Page 70Space, Page 165Space, Page 191Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 155Race, Page 239Labor, Page 96Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 133Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 113Labor, Page 88Space, Page 143Introduction, Page 21Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 43Space, Page 178Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 274Conclusion, Page 272Race, Page 229Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 156Race, Page 247Performance, Page 47Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 248Race, Page 251Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 131introduction-page-22Labor, Page 132Space, Page 188Race, Page 221Performance, Page 56Space, Page 183Race, Page 258Race, Page 219Performance, Page 40Performance, Page 76Performance, Page 34Race, Page 253Labor, Page 109Space, Page 181Labor, Page 122Space, Page 146Race, Page 252Labor, Page 97Space, Page 163Performance, Page 42Introduction, Page 20Space, Page 170Space, Page 138Labor, Page 126Labor, Page 93Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 67Introduction, Page 26Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 213Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 62Labor, Page 110Space, Page 197Race, Page 204Performance, Page 78Space, Page 171Conclusion, Page 286Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 23Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 195Performance, Page 60Space, Page 192Race, Page 257Introduction, Page 12Introduction, Page 18Space, Page 169Race, Page 245Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 137