Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 43Race, Page 245Performance, Page 50Space, Page 166Space, Page 188Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 133Race, Page 225Labor, Page 110Race, Page 232Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 72Space, Page 162Space, Page 182Performance, Page 42Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 40Conclusion, Page 289Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 102Race, Page 247Space, Page 190Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 97Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 123Race, Page 248Labor, Page 98Labor, Page 119Space, Page 156Race, Page 253Space, Page 192Space, Page 152Space, Page 159Race, Page 235Labor, Page 129Space, Page 197Race, Page 230Performance, Page 56Performance, Page 77Space, Page 148Labor, Page 96Space, Page 191Race, Page 204Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 175Labor, Page 112Space, Page 146Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 187Race, Page 220Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 206Performance, Page 76Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 20Race, Page 231Performance, Page 54Race, Page 239Space, Page 177Race, Page 224Space, Page 170Space, Page 193Space, Page 150Space, Page 165Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 181Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 184Labor, Page 122Race, Page 252Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 141Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 34Space, Page 143Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 78Space, Page 169Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 126Space, Page 171Race, Page 229Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 274Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 62Performance, Page 47Race, Page 219Introduction, Page 4Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 268Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 155Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 272Performance, Page 67Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 12Space, Page 183Space, Page 194Space, Page 195Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 261Space, Page 163introduction-page-22Race, Page 258Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 60Race, Page 242Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 18Race, Page 257Performance, Page 80