Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 175Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 122Space, Page 193Performance, Page 35Space, Page 188Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 98Space, Page 146Race, Page 257Race, Page 225Race, Page 239Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 96Race, Page 254Performance, Page 52Space, Page 182Performance, Page 54Race, Page 229Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 181Introduction, Page 9Performance, Page 67Race, Page 224Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 232Space, Page 162Space, Page 163Performance, Page 41Race, Page 253Space, Page 148Race, Page 221Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 197Performance, Page 43Space, Page 192Race, Page 247Space, Page 155Space, Page 172Performance, Page 60Race, Page 252Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 177Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 274Performance, Page 45Space, Page 152Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 272Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 268Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 261Race, Page 248Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 128Race, Page 242Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 137Performance, Page 56Labor, Page 97Performance, Page 72Space, Page 159Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 220Performance, Page 78Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 102Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 46Race, Page 230Race, Page 213Space, Page 150Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 183Performance, Page 40Space, Page 194Space, Page 138Race, Page 245Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 204Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 80Space, Page 178Race, Page 206Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 170Performance, Page 62Space, Page 190Space, Page 143Performance, Page 76Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 189Performance, Page 84Space, Page 187Performance, Page 70Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 156Labor, Page 112Race, Page 258Space, Page 165Introduction, Page 12Introduction, Page 18Space, Page 169Space, Page 141Introduction, Page 4introduction-page-22Space, Page 184Race, Page 219Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 171Labor, Page 126Introduction, Page 20Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 131Space, Page 166