Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 150Performance, Page 46Race, Page 206Space, Page 193Race, Page 252Race, Page 232Space, Page 146Space, Page 162Space, Page 165Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 253Space, Page 190Race, Page 248Labor, Page 133Race, Page 213Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 132Race, Page 247Space, Page 192Labor, Page 98Space, Page 166Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 102Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 45Race, Page 242Race, Page 235Space, Page 175Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 50Space, Page 177Labor, Page 96Space, Page 194Race, Page 224Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 251Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 143Space, Page 181Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 274Introduction, Page 20Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 123Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 231Race, Page 219Race, Page 220Space, Page 156Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 44Space, Page 197Space, Page 163Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 34Race, Page 258Race, Page 261Space, Page 172Labor, Page 112Race, Page 225Space, Page 170Race, Page 221Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 9Performance, Page 35Space, Page 152Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 184Space, Page 141Space, Page 171Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 62Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 97Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 93Space, Page 187Space, Page 182Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 239Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 4Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 191introduction-page-22Race, Page 230Race, Page 257Conclusion, Page 272Space, Page 155Labor, Page 122Space, Page 159Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 26Performance, Page 40Introduction, Page 12Performance, Page 80Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 76Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 188Labor, Page 126Performance, Page 67Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 204Introduction, Page 18Space, Page 195Space, Page 178Space, Page 137Space, Page 138Performance, Page 78Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 131Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 42Race, Page 245Space, Page 183Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 56Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 70Space, Page 169Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 268Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 60