Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 232Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 18Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 148Labor, Page 123Race, Page 239Race, Page 221Space, Page 163Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 44Space, Page 175Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 98Labor, Page 110Race, Page 220Race, Page 252Space, Page 181Race, Page 225Performance, Page 77Space, Page 192Performance, Page 50Space, Page 188Labor, Page 97Race, Page 251Space, Page 165Space, Page 152Performance, Page 80Race, Page 229Performance, Page 78Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 46Race, Page 242Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 189Space, Page 187Introduction, Page 9Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 162Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 274Conclusion, Page 268Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 34Space, Page 156Space, Page 177Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 119Race, Page 253Space, Page 172Performance, Page 60Space, Page 183Space, Page 141Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 166Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 133Race, Page 247Space, Page 190Space, Page 143Space, Page 155Race, Page 235Space, Page 178Labor, Page 126Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 300Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 254Labor, Page 88Space, Page 170Race, Page 230Labor, Page 96Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 132Space, Page 138Race, Page 248Race, Page 258Race, Page 245Race, Page 206Performance, Page 70introduction-page-22Space, Page 150Performance, Page 56Space, Page 182Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 12Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 191Labor, Page 102Performance, Page 67Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 20Race, Page 257Space, Page 197Space, Page 159Performance, Page 84Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 76Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 169Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 261Space, Page 194Performance, Page 41Race, Page 219Introduction, Page 1Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 26Performance, Page 62Race, Page 213Space, Page 184Space, Page 171Performance, Page 40Conclusion, Page 272