Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 97Space, Page 187Space, Page 188Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 129Race, Page 230Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 248Space, Page 192Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 112Space, Page 181Labor, Page 102Race, Page 225Space, Page 193Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 52Race, Page 206Race, Page 224Race, Page 261Race, Page 232Race, Page 247Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 221Space, Page 169Performance, Page 77Space, Page 155Introduction, Page 20Race, Page 242Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 189Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 204Performance, Page 82Space, Page 156Labor, Page 133Space, Page 177Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 268Race, Page 252Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 291Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 40Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 88Race, Page 239Space, Page 159Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 45Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 175Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 18Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 70Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 113Race, Page 229Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 67Performance, Page 80Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 182Labor, Page 123Race, Page 253Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 165Space, Page 162Race, Page 245Labor, Page 110Space, Page 194Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 258Space, Page 150Space, Page 183Labor, Page 128Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 152Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 119Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 257Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 171Space, Page 146Labor, Page 96Race, Page 220Performance, Page 78Performance, Page 50Performance, Page 76Space, Page 195Performance, Page 56Performance, Page 43Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 54Introduction, Page 9Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 213Race, Page 219Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 12Labor, Page 93Space, Page 191Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 272Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 60Space, Page 166Space, Page 178Space, Page 138Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 274Labor, Page 126Conclusion, Page 275introduction-page-22Performance, Page 62Space, Page 184