Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 21Performance, Page 42Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 187Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 272Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 50Race, Page 225Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 35Space, Page 192Labor, Page 122Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 128Space, Page 148Labor, Page 132Race, Page 239Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 20Race, Page 224Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 253Performance, Page 77Race, Page 204Race, Page 245Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 143Space, Page 155Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 47Race, Page 231Performance, Page 67Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 45Space, Page 150Labor, Page 98Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 286Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 109Space, Page 152Race, Page 206Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 195Performance, Page 76Race, Page 247Space, Page 166Performance, Page 70Space, Page 191Space, Page 162Space, Page 159Space, Page 141Race, Page 242Introduction, Page 18Labor, Page 96Space, Page 169Performance, Page 43Race, Page 248Race, Page 257Labor, Page 110Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 188Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 258Space, Page 156Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 80Race, Page 261Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 44Space, Page 190Space, Page 182Performance, Page 62Conclusion, Page 291Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 268Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 274Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 123Space, Page 172Performance, Page 56Space, Page 163Race, Page 213Race, Page 230Performance, Page 78Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 12Race, Page 220Space, Page 183Race, Page 229Space, Page 189Labor, Page 93Race, Page 219Race, Page 251Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 34Race, Page 232Space, Page 138Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 29Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 235Labor, Page 97Performance, Page 52Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 165Performance, Page 40introduction-page-22Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 46Space, Page 181Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 178Labor, Page 102Space, Page 184Labor, Page 126Conclusion, Page 303Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 252Space, Page 175Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 177