Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 113Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 190Space, Page 183Space, Page 193Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 102Space, Page 163Performance, Page 54Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 162Race, Page 225Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 150Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 67Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 148Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 46Race, Page 242Performance, Page 70Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 232Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 42Race, Page 224Labor, Page 93Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 50Space, Page 197Space, Page 165Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 98Race, Page 229Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 119Space, Page 172Race, Page 221Performance, Page 80Space, Page 152Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 35Race, Page 252Labor, Page 112Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 138Labor, Page 97Space, Page 155Race, Page 239Performance, Page 44Space, Page 143Performance, Page 56Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 268Labor, Page 96Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 133Race, Page 231Space, Page 187Performance, Page 40Race, Page 247Race, Page 251Race, Page 219Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 188Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 274Race, Page 257Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 192Race, Page 220Labor, Page 123Space, Page 194Performance, Page 34Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 258Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 84Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 206Space, Page 156Race, Page 245Performance, Page 76Performance, Page 78Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 248Performance, Page 60Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 169Introduction, Page 12Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 184Performance, Page 43Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 18Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 159Space, Page 171Labor, Page 126Space, Page 191introduction-page-22Labor, Page 131Space, Page 170Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 272Introduction, Page 20Space, Page 177Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 253Performance, Page 41Space, Page 178Space, Page 181Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 26Performance, Page 62Space, Page 195Space, Page 166