Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Space, page 20 of 36

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Space, Page 175

As sound films became popular in the late 1920s and 30s, cartoons were increasingly presented as containing sound, rather than merely accompanied by music and sound effects.

Both Amateur Nite (1929) and The Opry House (1929) use the theatre as a narrative frame for non-diegetic music, a background of sound. This framing technique for  sound soon gave way to the use of diegetic sound in cartoons. That is, sound and music changed from being a background to the action of the cartoon, to become something that the characters could hear and contribute to. 

In Amateur Nite, Oswald the Lucky Rabbit goes to a stage show and sees acts performed by animal characters with distinctly black bodies and white lips, a visual reminder of the role of blackface minstrelsy in vaudeville and in animation. Similarly, The Opry House depicts Mickey Mouse going to a show and performing three acts: snake-charming, an impression of a Hasidic Jew, and a piano solo. 

Bimbo's Initiation (1931) differed from past Fleischer cartoons that often played with the relationship between flat, 2-D drawn space and "real" cinematic space. In this cartoon Bimbo gets sucked into a manhole and ends up in a fantastic unified cinematic space that is shifting and unstable. 

Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Space, Page 175"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Space, page 20 of 36 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 148Race, Page 224Space, Page 146Performance, Page 84Race, Page 232Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 74Space, Page 187Race, Page 251Space, Page 152Race, Page 225Space, Page 150Space, Page 166Space, Page 181Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 42Race, Page 254Race, Page 239Labor, Page 101Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 102Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 119Race, Page 258Labor, Page 123Space, Page 193Space, Page 170Space, Page 162Race, Page 252Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 110Space, Page 178Space, Page 188Race, Page 261Labor, Page 96Space, Page 171Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 298Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 220Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 253Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 47Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 138Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 221Performance, Page 60Race, Page 247Labor, Page 88Race, Page 231Race, Page 230Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 169Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 177Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 195Space, Page 197Space, Page 190Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 109Space, Page 194Performance, Page 72Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 35Space, Page 163Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 82Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 183Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 52Space, Page 155Performance, Page 34Race, Page 204Space, Page 165Race, Page 242Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 191Space, Page 189Space, Page 184Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 143Race, Page 235Space, Page 159Labor, Page 115Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 141Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 76Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 213Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 156Space, Page 137Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 97Conclusion, Page 268