Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Space, page 20 of 36

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Space, Page 175

As sound films became popular in the late 1920s and 30s, cartoons were increasingly presented as containing sound, rather than merely accompanied by music and sound effects.

Both Amateur Nite (1929) and The Opry House (1929) use the theatre as a narrative frame for non-diegetic music, a background of sound. This framing technique for  sound soon gave way to the use of diegetic sound in cartoons. That is, sound and music changed from being a background to the action of the cartoon, to become something that the characters could hear and contribute to. 

In Amateur Nite, Oswald the Lucky Rabbit goes to a stage show and sees acts performed by animal characters with distinctly black bodies and white lips, a visual reminder of the role of blackface minstrelsy in vaudeville and in animation. Similarly, The Opry House depicts Mickey Mouse going to a show and performing three acts: snake-charming, an impression of a Hasidic Jew, and a piano solo. 

Bimbo's Initiation (1931) differed from past Fleischer cartoons that often played with the relationship between flat, 2-D drawn space and "real" cinematic space. In this cartoon Bimbo gets sucked into a manhole and ends up in a fantastic unified cinematic space that is shifting and unstable. 

Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Space, Page 175"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Space, page 20 of 36 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 170Space, Page 189Labor, Page 113Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 172Space, Page 188Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 72Space, Page 146Space, Page 152Race, Page 213Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 45Space, Page 159Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 258Performance, Page 82Space, Page 193Space, Page 181Race, Page 230Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 35Race, Page 235Race, Page 254Labor, Page 122Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 178Space, Page 155Space, Page 141Space, Page 148Performance, Page 60Race, Page 232Race, Page 247Labor, Page 133Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 162Space, Page 169Race, Page 231Race, Page 220Space, Page 197Performance, Page 34Space, Page 150Race, Page 239Space, Page 194Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 112Space, Page 190Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 268Race, Page 224Race, Page 221Race, Page 248Labor, Page 119Race, Page 225Space, Page 177Space, Page 191Performance, Page 46Race, Page 253Labor, Page 132Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 171Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 115Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 138Space, Page 195Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 229Performance, Page 43Space, Page 163Performance, Page 50Race, Page 242Race, Page 219Space, Page 182Space, Page 137Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 102Labor, Page 109Race, Page 261Space, Page 184Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 204Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 52Space, Page 165Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 70Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 156Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 96Labor, Page 101Space, Page 166Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 275Labor, Page 97Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 76Conclusion, Page 284