Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Space, page 20 of 36

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Space, Page 175

As sound films became popular in the late 1920s and 30s, cartoons were increasingly presented as containing sound, rather than merely accompanied by music and sound effects.

Both Amateur Nite (1929) and The Opry House (1929) use the theatre as a narrative frame for non-diegetic music, a background of sound. This framing technique for  sound soon gave way to the use of diegetic sound in cartoons. That is, sound and music changed from being a background to the action of the cartoon, to become something that the characters could hear and contribute to. 

In Amateur Nite, Oswald the Lucky Rabbit goes to a stage show and sees acts performed by animal characters with distinctly black bodies and white lips, a visual reminder of the role of blackface minstrelsy in vaudeville and in animation. Similarly, The Opry House depicts Mickey Mouse going to a show and performing three acts: snake-charming, an impression of a Hasidic Jew, and a piano solo. 

Bimbo's Initiation (1931) differed from past Fleischer cartoons that often played with the relationship between flat, 2-D drawn space and "real" cinematic space. In this cartoon Bimbo gets sucked into a manhole and ends up in a fantastic unified cinematic space that is shifting and unstable. 

Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Space, Page 175"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Space, page 20 of 36 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 44Space, Page 190Space, Page 150Space, Page 163Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 45Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 182Space, Page 178Race, Page 252Space, Page 143Space, Page 162Space, Page 146Labor, Page 88Race, Page 229Race, Page 239Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 110Race, Page 221Race, Page 232Race, Page 248Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 123Labor, Page 96Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 152Space, Page 194Introduction, Page 21Performance, Page 34Space, Page 177Race, Page 258Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 189Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 112Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 102Space, Page 172Race, Page 206Labor, Page 97Space, Page 187Race, Page 251Space, Page 159Race, Page 235Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 50Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 133Space, Page 197Race, Page 230Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 213Labor, Page 101Labor, Page 122Space, Page 155Race, Page 220Labor, Page 119Space, Page 181Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 254Space, Page 183Space, Page 148Space, Page 191Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 165Space, Page 193Space, Page 195Performance, Page 74Race, Page 224Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 275Labor, Page 128Space, Page 138Performance, Page 70Conclusion, Page 268Space, Page 184Space, Page 171Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 261Space, Page 170Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 43Race, Page 219Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 131Race, Page 247Performance, Page 52Space, Page 188Space, Page 169Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 115Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 166Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 76Space, Page 156Race, Page 242Conclusion, Page 284