Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 235Space, Page 197Space, Page 170Race, Page 230Labor, Page 112Race, Page 253Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 26Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 274Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 152Space, Page 169Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 34Space, Page 177Performance, Page 50Space, Page 188Space, Page 155Race, Page 248Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 129Space, Page 175Labor, Page 128Race, Page 229Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 52Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 219Space, Page 148Race, Page 245Race, Page 254Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 258Labor, Page 93Performance, Page 56Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 102Labor, Page 96Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 76Space, Page 187Performance, Page 78Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 88Race, Page 247Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 195Labor, Page 110Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 109Race, Page 220Labor, Page 113Race, Page 231Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 46Race, Page 232Performance, Page 67Performance, Page 35Race, Page 257Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 159Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 261Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 178Performance, Page 47Space, Page 165Performance, Page 70Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 141Introduction, Page 20Race, Page 206Space, Page 190Space, Page 162Race, Page 204Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 194Performance, Page 72Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 268Performance, Page 42Space, Page 171Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 98Race, Page 252Race, Page 239Performance, Page 62Space, Page 163Space, Page 172Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 12Race, Page 225Race, Page 242Space, Page 184Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 156Space, Page 181Labor, Page 126Performance, Page 77Race, Page 224Performance, Page 84Space, Page 138Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 131Space, Page 193Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 191Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 40Introduction, Page 18Space, Page 192Space, Page 137Space, Page 183introduction-page-22Introduction, Page 9Performance, Page 80Space, Page 166Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 97Conclusion, Page 272Introduction, Page 4