Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 76Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 9Performance, Page 50Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 170Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 206Performance, Page 45Race, Page 247Performance, Page 82Race, Page 231Race, Page 232Labor, Page 88Race, Page 235Performance, Page 47Space, Page 188Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 165Space, Page 184Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 169Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 224Space, Page 146Space, Page 152Space, Page 175Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 18Space, Page 193Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 102Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 132Race, Page 239Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 289Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 41Space, Page 183Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 257Space, Page 159Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 181Space, Page 162Labor, Page 96Race, Page 213Labor, Page 110Space, Page 150Space, Page 178Space, Page 182Labor, Page 133Space, Page 192Race, Page 221Race, Page 230Race, Page 258Labor, Page 93Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 251Labor, Page 123Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 304Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 248Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 194Race, Page 229Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 78Race, Page 253Race, Page 220Space, Page 156Performance, Page 54Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 274Performance, Page 42Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 219Space, Page 141Performance, Page 80Space, Page 189Space, Page 138Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 122Race, Page 242Performance, Page 72Space, Page 148Performance, Page 67Race, Page 261Performance, Page 62Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 113Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 272Race, Page 204Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 112Race, Page 245Space, Page 197Labor, Page 131Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 268Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 126Introduction, Page 4Introduction, Page 20Space, Page 187Performance, Page 46Space, Page 191introduction-page-22Performance, Page 56Introduction, Page 12Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 137Labor, Page 97Space, Page 171Space, Page 166Performance, Page 40Conclusion, Page 273