Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 175Labor, Page 119Space, Page 165Performance, Page 46Space, Page 182Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 47Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 268Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 96Performance, Page 50Race, Page 252Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 102Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 80Introduction, Page 20Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 113Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 35Space, Page 152Labor, Page 98Space, Page 150Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 188Space, Page 172Labor, Page 109Race, Page 232Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 84Race, Page 239Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 221Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 110Space, Page 187Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 93Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 155Performance, Page 43Space, Page 169Introduction, Page 14Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 40Race, Page 204Performance, Page 82Space, Page 178Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 77Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 195Labor, Page 126Space, Page 148Race, Page 220Race, Page 230Space, Page 193Space, Page 156Race, Page 247Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 133Space, Page 162Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 194Race, Page 213Race, Page 251Labor, Page 129Space, Page 141Space, Page 190Race, Page 253Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 163Race, Page 231Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 181Introduction, Page 12Space, Page 192introduction-page-22Space, Page 177Performance, Page 76Performance, Page 56Conclusion, Page 272Labor, Page 88Race, Page 245Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 225Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 146Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 143Space, Page 191Space, Page 184Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 274Space, Page 159Performance, Page 62Race, Page 261Introduction, Page 9Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 219Introduction, Page 18Space, Page 189Performance, Page 60Space, Page 166Labor, Page 97Race, Page 242Race, Page 257Space, Page 183Performance, Page 78Performance, Page 67