Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 272Space, Page 163Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 197Race, Page 224Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 102Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 46Race, Page 230Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 169Race, Page 253Space, Page 162Race, Page 254Space, Page 175Space, Page 172Space, Page 193Space, Page 138Race, Page 251Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 143Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 129Race, Page 204Performance, Page 67Space, Page 194Race, Page 231Performance, Page 50Performance, Page 56Space, Page 190Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 96Performance, Page 34Space, Page 148Race, Page 221Race, Page 206Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 239Space, Page 165Space, Page 150Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 219Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 268Introduction, Page 18Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 98Space, Page 137Labor, Page 113Labor, Page 97Performance, Page 42Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 178Space, Page 181Race, Page 248Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 123Space, Page 188Performance, Page 40Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 247Space, Page 170Space, Page 159Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 110Introduction, Page 21Labor, Page 88Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 146Performance, Page 76Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 242Race, Page 258Space, Page 187Race, Page 225Race, Page 220Introduction, Page 9Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 122Race, Page 232Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 93Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 195Race, Page 229Space, Page 192Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 235Space, Page 156Conclusion, Page 274Race, Page 213Labor, Page 119Introduction, Page 12Space, Page 184Race, Page 261Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 20Race, Page 252Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 78Performance, Page 62Space, Page 191Space, Page 166Labor, Page 126Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 245Performance, Page 80Race, Page 257introduction-page-22Introduction, Page 4