Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 50Space, Page 190Labor, Page 102Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 72Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 229Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 231Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 20Space, Page 155Performance, Page 34Space, Page 169Space, Page 197Space, Page 143Race, Page 258Performance, Page 46Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 97Performance, Page 44Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 206Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 78Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 110Space, Page 152Space, Page 193Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 272Performance, Page 56Introduction, Page 18Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 253Labor, Page 122Space, Page 187Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 112Race, Page 232Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 230Space, Page 195Race, Page 224Performance, Page 40Performance, Page 35Introduction, Page 9Conclusion, Page 268Labor, Page 98Race, Page 242Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 204Space, Page 159Race, Page 251Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 177Performance, Page 77Space, Page 162Labor, Page 132Race, Page 247Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 254Space, Page 182Labor, Page 123Space, Page 150Space, Page 175Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 183Race, Page 213Labor, Page 133Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 156Performance, Page 82Space, Page 194Performance, Page 76Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 126Race, Page 220Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 274Performance, Page 54Race, Page 257Introduction, Page 12Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 184Space, Page 165Labor, Page 96Race, Page 239Space, Page 181Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 47Space, Page 191Space, Page 170Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 67Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 252Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 84Race, Page 219Space, Page 178Space, Page 171Space, Page 172Race, Page 245Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 43Space, Page 192Race, Page 225Race, Page 248Space, Page 188Performance, Page 80Conclusion, Page 275introduction-page-22Space, Page 166Performance, Page 62