Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Labor, Page 109Race, Page 247Space, Page 150Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 43Space, Page 189Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 50Space, Page 143Labor, Page 123Introduction, Page 1Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 175Space, Page 177Race, Page 235Space, Page 194Race, Page 221Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 34Race, Page 242Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 126Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 183Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 172Space, Page 191Race, Page 252Race, Page 230Space, Page 156Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 46Race, Page 258Race, Page 206Race, Page 224Race, Page 229Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 268Space, Page 146Race, Page 257Introduction, Page 12Space, Page 152introduction-page-22Labor, Page 102Space, Page 169Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 40Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 132Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 18Race, Page 254Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 274Race, Page 253Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 97Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 56Race, Page 239Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 96Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 112Space, Page 187Space, Page 148Space, Page 188Space, Page 192Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 181Performance, Page 54Space, Page 165Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 72Race, Page 261Space, Page 170Race, Page 232Space, Page 138Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 9Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 67Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 80Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 52Race, Page 231Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 245Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 272Introduction, Page 26Race, Page 251Performance, Page 60Space, Page 178Performance, Page 78Space, Page 155Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 225Space, Page 137Space, Page 184Space, Page 190Performance, Page 70Space, Page 159Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 171Space, Page 197Race, Page 220Introduction, Page 20Space, Page 195Performance, Page 76Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 163Space, Page 193Space, Page 166Performance, Page 62Conclusion, Page 303