Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 204Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 172Race, Page 247Race, Page 251Race, Page 224Performance, Page 84Space, Page 150Labor, Page 93Race, Page 230Performance, Page 80Performance, Page 35Race, Page 206Race, Page 248Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 44Space, Page 188Conclusion, Page 290Introduction, Page 18Introduction, Page 9Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 110Space, Page 182Space, Page 192Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 102Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 239Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 119Race, Page 219Race, Page 221Performance, Page 40Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 50Race, Page 252Race, Page 254Performance, Page 77Space, Page 191Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 45Space, Page 141Space, Page 152Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 268Introduction, Page 21Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 138Space, Page 156Race, Page 232Space, Page 193Space, Page 181Space, Page 184Race, Page 213Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 190Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 194Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 272Race, Page 229Performance, Page 78Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 62Performance, Page 56Space, Page 169Conclusion, Page 300Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 82Space, Page 159Labor, Page 96Space, Page 155Race, Page 257Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 162Space, Page 165Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 303Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 76Space, Page 177Space, Page 148Race, Page 261Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 274Space, Page 143Space, Page 175Space, Page 183Space, Page 170Performance, Page 67Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 12Race, Page 225Race, Page 242Space, Page 166Race, Page 253Race, Page 258Race, Page 235Labor, Page 126Performance, Page 72Space, Page 197Labor, Page 133Introduction, Page 20Space, Page 178Labor, Page 97Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 163Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 26introduction-page-22Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 245Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 195Space, Page 171