Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 74

Stereotypical and fantastic images of Africans and African Americans were the common currency for wildness in the early twentieth century white fantasy. For example, Winsor McCay draws the stereotypical African native Impy in Little Nemo (1911). In this film, McCay converts the lightning-sketch act through which he presented Nemo on the vaudeville stage into Little Nemo (1911), weaving the act of animating into the animation itself. Having done the intense labor of animation offscreen, he now performs it for the camera. Note the vaudevillian staging conventions.

The Fleischers also wove vaudevillian themes in many of their shorts. In Ko-Ko Trains 'Em (1925), Max Fleischer argues with Ko-Ko when Ko-Ko becomes jealous of Max's attention to his young ward and her dog and tries to create a circus by training animals, then fleas. The fleas escape the animated world, infecting the "real" people watching him—offering an example of the Fleischers' vaudevillian play with the boundary between the real and the animate.

Walt Disney only drew cartoons until 1928, but always performed the animator, as when he seems to struggle over a drawing in his Newman Laugh-O-Grams (1921).
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 74"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 19 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 178Space, Page 156Race, Page 252Space, Page 143Performance, Page 42Race, Page 204Space, Page 192Performance, Page 54Race, Page 254Space, Page 146Race, Page 235Race, Page 221Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 253Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 98Labor, Page 110Race, Page 225Race, Page 232Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 177Space, Page 150Space, Page 148Space, Page 163Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 88Space, Page 193Space, Page 181Race, Page 247Labor, Page 132Race, Page 224Race, Page 231Performance, Page 50Performance, Page 78Performance, Page 43Race, Page 239Labor, Page 102Performance, Page 67Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 126Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 72Space, Page 183Labor, Page 129Race, Page 248Introduction, Page 21Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 96Race, Page 206Space, Page 152Performance, Page 44Space, Page 197Race, Page 261Space, Page 184Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 97Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 191Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 56Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 188Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 190Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 133Race, Page 220Space, Page 138Introduction, Page 20Performance, Page 41Space, Page 165Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 82Space, Page 169Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 272Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 304Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 187Introduction, Page 12Introduction, Page 18Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 268Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 122Space, Page 182Performance, Page 77Space, Page 170Performance, Page 40Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 284introduction-page-22Space, Page 166Performance, Page 47Space, Page 159Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 195Race, Page 258Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 137Race, Page 251Space, Page 171Space, Page 141Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 93Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 62Race, Page 257Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 219Introduction, Page 9Race, Page 242Conclusion, Page 274Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 76Performance, Page 80Race, Page 213Race, Page 245