Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 72

The term "pickaninny" is a derogatory term for poor African American children, who were (and are) often stereotyped as immature, rebellious, and immune to pain. According to Felix the Cat creator Otto Messmer, Pat Sullivan, the producer of Felix, had first created a character, Sammy Jonsin, who was based on the stereotype of the pickaninny. That character eventually became Felix.

The pickanniny was a common figure in popular culture during the early twentieth century. A Blatz gum ad from a 1928 issue of the movie fan magazine Photoplay blithely asks why a pickaninny loves watermelon, implying that his uncontrollable appetites will lead him to steal that same fruit.

That voraciousness is on display when Felix dreams of an ideal future in which he can eat endlessly in Futuritzy (1928), simultaneously demonstrating the economy of line and of stereotype through which Sullivan Studios created its animated worlds.

Comment on this page

Discussion of "Performance, Page 72"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 18 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 43Race, Page 230Race, Page 225Space, Page 193Space, Page 188Space, Page 182Space, Page 150Space, Page 181Performance, Page 44Race, Page 204Performance, Page 84Space, Page 152Labor, Page 112Space, Page 194Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 102Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 54Space, Page 162Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 190Space, Page 146Performance, Page 74Conclusion, Page 290Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 253Space, Page 189Performance, Page 35Race, Page 220Race, Page 229Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 231Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 258Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 248Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 261Labor, Page 93Space, Page 137Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 18Race, Page 239Space, Page 175Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 224Space, Page 184Performance, Page 80Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 6Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 197Performance, Page 47Space, Page 187Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 165Race, Page 221Performance, Page 70Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 109Space, Page 192Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 96Conclusion, Page 286Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 206Labor, Page 126Introduction, Page 12Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 138Space, Page 171Space, Page 183Space, Page 159Race, Page 247Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 60Space, Page 163Performance, Page 50Space, Page 172Labor, Page 113Space, Page 143Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 101Race, Page 252Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 78Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 67Space, Page 155Race, Page 235Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 274Race, Page 254Space, Page 170Space, Page 141Race, Page 257Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 34Introduction, Page 9Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 272Performance, Page 40Space, Page 169Performance, Page 62introduction-page-22Space, Page 191Race, Page 245Conclusion, Page 268Race, Page 219Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 56Introduction, Page 20Space, Page 156