Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 72

The term "pickaninny" is a derogatory term for poor African American children, who were (and are) often stereotyped as immature, rebellious, and immune to pain. According to Felix the Cat creator Otto Messmer, Pat Sullivan, the producer of Felix, had first created a character, Sammy Jonsin, who was based on the stereotype of the pickaninny. That character eventually became Felix.

The pickanniny was a common figure in popular culture during the early twentieth century. A Blatz gum ad from a 1928 issue of the movie fan magazine Photoplay blithely asks why a pickaninny loves watermelon, implying that his uncontrollable appetites will lead him to steal that same fruit.

That voraciousness is on display when Felix dreams of an ideal future in which he can eat endlessly in Futuritzy (1928), simultaneously demonstrating the economy of line and of stereotype through which Sullivan Studios created its animated worlds.

Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 72"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 18 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 247Performance, Page 74Race, Page 251Space, Page 146Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 84Space, Page 162Performance, Page 77Space, Page 187Space, Page 150Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 40Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 122Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 98Race, Page 261Space, Page 143Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 80Labor, Page 93Labor, Page 101Race, Page 219Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 6Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 239Race, Page 229Race, Page 253Labor, Page 133Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 232Race, Page 204Space, Page 194Space, Page 175Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 44Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 20Space, Page 177Space, Page 183Space, Page 188Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 102Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 54Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 148Space, Page 172Race, Page 252Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 35Race, Page 235Race, Page 224Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 303Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 159Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 12Labor, Page 123Race, Page 230Labor, Page 128Space, Page 190Race, Page 225Performance, Page 47Space, Page 170Labor, Page 113Space, Page 156Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 165Race, Page 258Conclusion, Page 274Labor, Page 132Space, Page 141Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 163Performance, Page 56Space, Page 178Space, Page 155Performance, Page 70Space, Page 181Space, Page 192Conclusion, Page 268Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 272Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 50Labor, Page 126Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 302introduction-page-22Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 220Space, Page 193Race, Page 248Race, Page 206Introduction, Page 18Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 67Labor, Page 119Space, Page 184Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 96Race, Page 245Performance, Page 62Performance, Page 78Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 169Race, Page 257