Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 182Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 123Race, Page 206Space, Page 191Race, Page 261Space, Page 137Labor, Page 113Space, Page 165Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 184Space, Page 172Performance, Page 70Race, Page 251Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 146Race, Page 252Labor, Page 101Race, Page 204Space, Page 150Performance, Page 72Race, Page 254Space, Page 193Space, Page 148Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 239Introduction, Page 1Labor, Page 133Space, Page 189Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 175Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 54Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 170Performance, Page 74Race, Page 229Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 42Space, Page 194Race, Page 231Race, Page 248Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 230Race, Page 213Labor, Page 110Race, Page 219Race, Page 220Performance, Page 50Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 141Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 82Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 235Race, Page 247Space, Page 187Labor, Page 88Space, Page 197Space, Page 162Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 298Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 155Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 112Space, Page 188Race, Page 253Space, Page 152Race, Page 221Space, Page 190Performance, Page 60Space, Page 138Space, Page 171Race, Page 225Space, Page 181Space, Page 163Space, Page 183Space, Page 195Performance, Page 45Race, Page 224Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 119Space, Page 143Performance, Page 43Race, Page 232Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 102Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 40Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 4