Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21


You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 35Labor, Page 123Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 150Performance, Page 45Space, Page 182Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 23Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 229Race, Page 232Race, Page 258Race, Page 261Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 50Race, Page 254Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 113Space, Page 165Race, Page 252Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 138Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 60Space, Page 193Space, Page 190Space, Page 152Labor, Page 98Race, Page 231Race, Page 224Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 188Labor, Page 119Race, Page 248Race, Page 230Space, Page 178Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 253Space, Page 195Performance, Page 47Space, Page 189Space, Page 184Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 54Space, Page 148Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 162Space, Page 177Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 146Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 221Space, Page 143Space, Page 155Labor, Page 132Space, Page 181Race, Page 251Race, Page 206Space, Page 183Performance, Page 82Race, Page 220Labor, Page 128Space, Page 163Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 52Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 197Labor, Page 129Race, Page 225Performance, Page 41Race, Page 239Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 187Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 72Space, Page 191Performance, Page 43Space, Page 175Race, Page 213Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 204Labor, Page 101Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 42Race, Page 247Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 40Labor, Page 102Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 170Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 4