Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 150Labor, Page 123Space, Page 148Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 21Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 113Space, Page 162Space, Page 189Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 34Space, Page 184Race, Page 261Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 52Race, Page 220Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 110Race, Page 235Performance, Page 70Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 183Labor, Page 112Space, Page 172Labor, Page 88Race, Page 252Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 54Race, Page 239Space, Page 193Labor, Page 128Race, Page 229Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 98Race, Page 247Race, Page 248Labor, Page 133Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 204Performance, Page 45Race, Page 230Space, Page 163Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 102Space, Page 155Race, Page 206Space, Page 194Space, Page 178Race, Page 225Performance, Page 50Race, Page 231Labor, Page 101Space, Page 182Space, Page 177Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 171Labor, Page 132Race, Page 258Space, Page 197Race, Page 232Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 109Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 74Race, Page 253Space, Page 181Performance, Page 41Space, Page 152Space, Page 146Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 129Space, Page 137Performance, Page 82Space, Page 190Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 138Space, Page 175Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 213Labor, Page 131Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 35Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 219Space, Page 141Space, Page 195Space, Page 188Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 40Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 273