Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 232Race, Page 230Space, Page 152Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 42Race, Page 247Space, Page 183Labor, Page 123Space, Page 165Labor, Page 133Space, Page 162Race, Page 229Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 109Race, Page 261Space, Page 194Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 98Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 220Labor, Page 128Space, Page 190Race, Page 206Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 239Performance, Page 43Race, Page 258Race, Page 251Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 254Performance, Page 46Space, Page 177Race, Page 204Performance, Page 45Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 112Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 146Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 101Labor, Page 102Space, Page 138Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 137Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 40Space, Page 184Labor, Page 129Space, Page 148Labor, Page 131Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 47Race, Page 221Space, Page 189Race, Page 252Performance, Page 74Race, Page 253Performance, Page 77Space, Page 187Space, Page 163Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 50Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 175Space, Page 188Race, Page 248Space, Page 150Space, Page 193Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 88Space, Page 141Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 35Space, Page 181Space, Page 182Performance, Page 72Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 155Space, Page 170Performance, Page 84Space, Page 143Race, Page 219Introduction, Page 30Race, Page 213Labor, Page 110Space, Page 171Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 284