Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 131Space, Page 172Labor, Page 123Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 194Space, Page 141Race, Page 231Race, Page 258Performance, Page 82Space, Page 148Space, Page 175Space, Page 193Space, Page 197Space, Page 187Race, Page 204Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 290Labor, Page 133Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 35Race, Page 213Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 109Race, Page 230Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 189Space, Page 146Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 70Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 229Race, Page 224Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 221Space, Page 162Race, Page 248Race, Page 232Space, Page 165Performance, Page 47Space, Page 190Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 143Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 225Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 54Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 50Space, Page 137Race, Page 239Space, Page 152Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 261Performance, Page 60Space, Page 178Space, Page 188Race, Page 252Labor, Page 113Race, Page 219Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 184Labor, Page 112Space, Page 150Race, Page 251Space, Page 163Space, Page 155Labor, Page 119Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 206Race, Page 247Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 43Space, Page 138Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 253Performance, Page 44Space, Page 191Performance, Page 34Space, Page 181Performance, Page 40Labor, Page 102Space, Page 170Space, Page 171Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 275