Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 254Labor, Page 109Space, Page 191Space, Page 170Race, Page 248Performance, Page 74Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 247Performance, Page 45Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 150Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 187Space, Page 148Race, Page 220Space, Page 193Space, Page 181Labor, Page 133Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 239Space, Page 194Race, Page 231Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 131Space, Page 178Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 253Race, Page 206Space, Page 175Performance, Page 47Space, Page 182Performance, Page 54Space, Page 177Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 184Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 213Performance, Page 70Race, Page 230Space, Page 143Race, Page 204Space, Page 155Performance, Page 60Space, Page 165Labor, Page 112Conclusion, Page 298Introduction, Page 21Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 163Space, Page 152Race, Page 261Race, Page 232Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 128Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 42Space, Page 188Race, Page 229Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 101Race, Page 224Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 251Performance, Page 44Space, Page 162Space, Page 146Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 252Performance, Page 50Performance, Page 35Race, Page 219Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 190Race, Page 221Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 113Space, Page 183Race, Page 225Performance, Page 41Space, Page 138Space, Page 195Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 137Performance, Page 40Space, Page 171Conclusion, Page 296Labor, Page 102Race, Page 235Performance, Page 43