Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author
Labor, page 14 of 21


You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Labor, Page 122

With the arrival of sound to film, the spaces that cartoons depicted referred more often to Hollywood:

Toyland Premier (1934) features a wide range of celebrity caricatures, from Tarzan to Shirley Temple, to Al Jolson, to Bing Crosby, and the hit comedy duo Laurel and Hardy, all helping Santa out. 

Hollywood Capers (1935) depicts Beans the Cat sneaking into a Hollywood studio by pretending to be Oliver Hardy.

You Ought To Be In Pictures (1940) combines animation and live action, introducing the animated segment by viewing an animator's workspace. This recalls early cartoons which highlighted the animator's hand. The animation otherwise revolves around the importance of the Hollywood studios, and their contrast to the cartoon industry.

Swooner Crooner (1944) features Raymond Scott’s anthem to industrialism, “Powerhouse." With caricatures of teen idols Frank Sinatra and Bing Crosby as the central characters, it parodies the shift of women workers into wartime manufacturing jobs.

Mother Goose Goes Hollywood (1938) was long censored due to its racist stereotypes. In the cartoon, a pie hits Katherine Hepburn in the face, mimicking blackface, and her voice changes to a minstrel dialect. Moreover, the three black stars shown, Cab Calloway, Fats Waller and Stepin Fetchit, all emerge from a pie (like "blackbirds") and are joined by a chorus of minstrels. (Compare this with Pie Pie Blackbird [1932].)
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Labor, Page 122"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Labor, page 14 of 21 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 45Race, Page 258Performance, Page 60Space, Page 190Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 146Performance, Page 50Race, Page 204Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 247Race, Page 254Space, Page 189Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 101Space, Page 187Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 220Space, Page 188Space, Page 182Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 113Space, Page 184Space, Page 155Race, Page 251Space, Page 178Space, Page 194Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 197Labor, Page 133Space, Page 137Labor, Page 98Space, Page 141Performance, Page 84Space, Page 195Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 150Labor, Page 102Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 74Race, Page 224Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 177Race, Page 206Race, Page 229Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 54Race, Page 239Race, Page 219Space, Page 191Space, Page 171Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 291Introduction, Page 21Performance, Page 72Race, Page 261Space, Page 172Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 128Race, Page 225Performance, Page 70Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 235Race, Page 231Race, Page 232Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 162Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 252Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 248Space, Page 148Labor, Page 132Space, Page 165Race, Page 230Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 47Performance, Page 42Space, Page 163Space, Page 181Space, Page 170Space, Page 138Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 34Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 35Race, Page 213Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 40Performance, Page 41Labor, Page 131