Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Labor, Page 98Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 150Race, Page 230Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 239Race, Page 224Race, Page 235Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 253Race, Page 219Labor, Page 132Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 46Space, Page 187Performance, Page 77Space, Page 189Labor, Page 119Space, Page 141Race, Page 229Space, Page 148Performance, Page 72Space, Page 190Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 292Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 181Race, Page 252Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 194Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 178Race, Page 261Performance, Page 82Space, Page 152Performance, Page 70Race, Page 258Space, Page 188Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 231Race, Page 206Space, Page 171Space, Page 155Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 163Space, Page 196Labor, Page 88Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 172Performance, Page 35Space, Page 182Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 54Space, Page 170Space, Page 137Performance, Page 50Space, Page 175Space, Page 177Labor, Page 112Race, Page 248Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 42Race, Page 225Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 34Space, Page 162Race, Page 213Race, Page 251Labor, Page 123Race, Page 220Race, Page 232Labor, Page 113Race, Page 247Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 193Space, Page 191Space, Page 183Space, Page 138Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 195Performance, Page 45Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 101Race, Page 204Space, Page 184Introduction, Page 16Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 245Performance, Page 41