Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 175Race, Page 258Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 230Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 252Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 72Race, Page 232Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 188Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 113Space, Page 177Space, Page 152Race, Page 220Performance, Page 42Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 128Space, Page 148Race, Page 239Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 52Space, Page 187Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 193Space, Page 181Performance, Page 50Race, Page 245Space, Page 150Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 35Race, Page 231Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 60Race, Page 247Race, Page 221Space, Page 165Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 189Labor, Page 112Race, Page 229Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 123Labor, Page 110Race, Page 213Performance, Page 77Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 253Race, Page 235Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 141Race, Page 248Performance, Page 47Space, Page 183Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 206Space, Page 191Space, Page 170Labor, Page 98Space, Page 138Space, Page 162Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 133Space, Page 190Race, Page 254Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 171Space, Page 182Performance, Page 44Space, Page 196Space, Page 184Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 261Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 143Labor, Page 131Space, Page 195Race, Page 219Performance, Page 74Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 137Space, Page 163Race, Page 204Labor, Page 101