Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 232Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 188Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 133Race, Page 224Space, Page 175Race, Page 229Race, Page 239Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 162Space, Page 177Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 137Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 128Race, Page 220Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 109Space, Page 196Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 195Space, Page 170Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 183Labor, Page 122Space, Page 146Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 50Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 70Space, Page 150Performance, Page 35Space, Page 172Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 46Space, Page 189Labor, Page 101Labor, Page 112Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 191Space, Page 193Race, Page 258Race, Page 248Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 252Performance, Page 54Space, Page 194Race, Page 219Space, Page 187Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 251Race, Page 247Performance, Page 44Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 47Race, Page 204Performance, Page 34Race, Page 253Performance, Page 72Race, Page 206Race, Page 261Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 165Space, Page 178Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 184Space, Page 190Space, Page 141Space, Page 148Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 254Space, Page 163Labor, Page 110Space, Page 152Race, Page 245Race, Page 235Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 74Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 181Space, Page 143Race, Page 221Space, Page 171Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 43Conclusion, Page 304Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 16Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 275