Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 184Race, Page 229Race, Page 251Space, Page 183Performance, Page 72Space, Page 162Labor, Page 133Race, Page 230Space, Page 165Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 50Space, Page 177Race, Page 206Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 109Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 239Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 122Space, Page 188Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 155Race, Page 247Space, Page 146Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 82Race, Page 253Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 181Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 150Race, Page 258Race, Page 224Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 45Race, Page 220Space, Page 172Space, Page 194Performance, Page 46Race, Page 213Race, Page 231Space, Page 171Labor, Page 112Space, Page 175Race, Page 235Space, Page 187Race, Page 248Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 101Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 44Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 245Labor, Page 132Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 143Race, Page 225Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 193Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 41Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 60Space, Page 190Performance, Page 42Space, Page 195Performance, Page 52Performance, Page 74Race, Page 254Performance, Page 43Space, Page 189Race, Page 252Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 170Race, Page 219Space, Page 196Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 178Labor, Page 123Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 182Race, Page 204Space, Page 163Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 138Space, Page 141Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 137Introduction, Page 16