Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 231Labor, Page 133Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 128Space, Page 195Labor, Page 119Race, Page 204Labor, Page 101Space, Page 175Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 184Introduction, Page 16Space, Page 177Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 122Space, Page 165Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 141Performance, Page 42Space, Page 152Introduction, Page 14Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 110Race, Page 239Race, Page 221Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 220Space, Page 172Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 275Labor, Page 123Space, Page 183Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 109Space, Page 146Race, Page 206Space, Page 181Space, Page 194Race, Page 245Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 229Race, Page 253Race, Page 235Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 72Space, Page 191Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 150Space, Page 187Space, Page 189Space, Page 138Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 47Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 193Space, Page 190Space, Page 178Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 291Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 50Space, Page 170Space, Page 188Space, Page 148Performance, Page 82Race, Page 224Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 248Performance, Page 46Race, Page 247Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 88Labor, Page 131Space, Page 171Labor, Page 113Space, Page 137Race, Page 261Race, Page 252Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 70Space, Page 197Performance, Page 44Space, Page 163Labor, Page 132Space, Page 196Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 182Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 304Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 74Race, Page 254Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 290Introduction, Page 26Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 213Performance, Page 43