Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 258Labor, Page 128Space, Page 182Labor, Page 112Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 248Introduction, Page 26Performance, Page 42Space, Page 162Space, Page 190Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 52Space, Page 150Performance, Page 77Space, Page 141Labor, Page 123Race, Page 247Race, Page 219Labor, Page 119Race, Page 224Space, Page 165Performance, Page 43Race, Page 225Labor, Page 109Space, Page 155Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 132Space, Page 188Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 50Space, Page 175Space, Page 172Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 47Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 254Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 221Space, Page 193Race, Page 204Race, Page 220Performance, Page 82Space, Page 194Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 232Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 171Space, Page 195Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 44Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 178Space, Page 148Performance, Page 35Space, Page 189Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 304Race, Page 229Labor, Page 122Space, Page 191Race, Page 206Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 181Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 184Race, Page 245Performance, Page 45Space, Page 177Race, Page 239Space, Page 143Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 152Space, Page 183Space, Page 170Race, Page 252Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 113Race, Page 213Space, Page 196Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 101Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 286Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 261Performance, Page 74Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 84Space, Page 197Space, Page 138Performance, Page 60Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 16