Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 252Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 47Space, Page 138Space, Page 197Race, Page 254Race, Page 232Race, Page 229Race, Page 247Space, Page 187Race, Page 239Space, Page 162Performance, Page 34Labor, Page 110Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 35Space, Page 163Race, Page 204Performance, Page 60Space, Page 178Labor, Page 132Space, Page 188Space, Page 177Performance, Page 45Race, Page 206Space, Page 150Space, Page 194Race, Page 225Space, Page 181Introduction, Page 30Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 296Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 191Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 131Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 77Race, Page 231Space, Page 189Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 128Labor, Page 119Race, Page 230Space, Page 172Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 141Space, Page 152Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 54Space, Page 155Race, Page 235Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 74Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 50Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 220Race, Page 248Space, Page 148Space, Page 146Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 175Race, Page 221Labor, Page 123Space, Page 183Race, Page 258Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 143Race, Page 213Labor, Page 113Race, Page 261Introduction, Page 26Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 196Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 195Race, Page 253Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 70Performance, Page 82Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 41Performance, Page 43Space, Page 184Introduction, Page 16Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 245Conclusion, Page 303Race, Page 224Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 4