Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 21

Animators and the cartoons they produced were and are the twentieth-century inheritors of the iconography, conventions, and performance tropes of blackface minstrelsy.

In Harman and Ising's Bosko the Talk-Ink Kid, circa 1930, Bosko performs the audience interaction common to both minstrelsy and vaudeville. By the late 1930s, the associative links between cartoons and the minstrel stage had become largely vestigial, but at the beginning of the decade they still had currency. Bosko performs a classic two-act with animator Rudy Ising as his interlocutor, in a dynamic that Disney would reprise in performances of the father/son relationship between Walt Disney and Mickey Mouse.   

In the 1840s—not long after the mythical "originator" of the practice of blackface minstrelsy Thomas Dartmouth Rice began blacking up as Jim Crow—Stephen Foster began writing minstrel classics such as "Old Folks at Home" and "Camptown Races." But Rice had already penned the most enduring minstrel song, "Old Zip Coon," which later became "Turkey in the Straw." That tune is well-known today, not as a staple of the minstrel stage but as the innocuous melody that heralds ice cream trucks
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 21"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 12 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 88Race, Page 247Space, Page 143Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 50Space, Page 162Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 42Space, Page 165Space, Page 189Race, Page 232Race, Page 206Space, Page 193Performance, Page 47Race, Page 261Space, Page 148Performance, Page 72Space, Page 194Performance, Page 77Race, Page 248Race, Page 258Race, Page 221Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 98Space, Page 195Space, Page 181Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 175Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 291Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 150Space, Page 163Labor, Page 110Introduction, Page 29Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 129Space, Page 155Race, Page 251Labor, Page 132Space, Page 183Labor, Page 113Space, Page 146Race, Page 230Space, Page 138Labor, Page 109Race, Page 231Space, Page 187Space, Page 171Space, Page 196Performance, Page 52Race, Page 213Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 82Race, Page 225Race, Page 239Performance, Page 74Space, Page 188Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 197Labor, Page 123Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 34Race, Page 254Race, Page 220Space, Page 177Labor, Page 128Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 23Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 229Space, Page 137Labor, Page 112Space, Page 190Race, Page 252Labor, Page 131Space, Page 182Space, Page 178Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 152Space, Page 141Race, Page 204Labor, Page 101Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 16Performance, Page 54Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 235Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 184Performance, Page 43Race, Page 245Introduction, Page 26