Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 42Race, Page 232Space, Page 197Space, Page 141Performance, Page 43Introduction, Page 6Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 82Space, Page 181Space, Page 183Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 41Race, Page 231Space, Page 143Space, Page 165Space, Page 184Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 220Space, Page 172Race, Page 248Race, Page 229Race, Page 258Race, Page 251Performance, Page 40Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 175Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 253Labor, Page 129Race, Page 230Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 221Race, Page 247Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 188Space, Page 150Space, Page 182Space, Page 194Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 177Labor, Page 133Space, Page 148Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 204Race, Page 213Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 50Space, Page 178Space, Page 195Labor, Page 128Space, Page 162Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 152Space, Page 155Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 278Introduction, Page 15Space, Page 137Space, Page 170Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 52Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 206Space, Page 193Space, Page 190Performance, Page 45Space, Page 191Race, Page 239Space, Page 187Space, Page 146Space, Page 138Race, Page 219Performance, Page 72Introduction, Page 16Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 284Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 98Race, Page 235Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 54Race, Page 254Labor, Page 119Performance, Page 44