Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 152Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 43Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 298Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 197Race, Page 225Space, Page 195Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 193Performance, Page 54Race, Page 251Space, Page 191Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 232Performance, Page 50Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 84Space, Page 141Race, Page 261Race, Page 220Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 45Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 165Space, Page 177Introduction, Page 15Labor, Page 88Race, Page 252Race, Page 224Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 42Race, Page 230Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 247Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 286Race, Page 235Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 213Performance, Page 34Race, Page 231Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 181Space, Page 146Space, Page 182Performance, Page 44Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 172Race, Page 254Space, Page 163Space, Page 194Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 187Performance, Page 41Space, Page 184Space, Page 148Space, Page 189Space, Page 170Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 188Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 60Space, Page 155Space, Page 150Conclusion, Page 300Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 82Space, Page 171Race, Page 206Race, Page 258Labor, Page 131Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 248Race, Page 239Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 290Space, Page 178Labor, Page 112Space, Page 138Performance, Page 40Space, Page 137Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 119Introduction, Page 16Space, Page 143Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 74Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 204