Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 16Race, Page 220Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 278Performance, Page 84Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 187Space, Page 194Race, Page 230Race, Page 235Race, Page 261Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 181Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 162Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 231Space, Page 172Conclusion, Page 296Introduction, Page 21Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 133Space, Page 190Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 132Race, Page 206Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 197Space, Page 182Race, Page 258Space, Page 163Space, Page 178Labor, Page 123Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 122Labor, Page 113Space, Page 191Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 29Race, Page 232Space, Page 148Space, Page 138Performance, Page 60Space, Page 155Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 88Race, Page 204Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 82Race, Page 253Performance, Page 52Space, Page 177Performance, Page 45Performance, Page 72Introduction, Page 15Space, Page 183Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 225Performance, Page 46Space, Page 189Space, Page 193Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 41Race, Page 219Labor, Page 119Space, Page 195Labor, Page 110Space, Page 188Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 303Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 275Race, Page 213Race, Page 224Race, Page 251Performance, Page 35Space, Page 141Race, Page 229Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 50Race, Page 247Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 44Space, Page 150Performance, Page 74Space, Page 152Space, Page 165Performance, Page 43Space, Page 184Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 54Race, Page 239Space, Page 171Space, Page 143Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 40