Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 213Space, Page 194Space, Page 163Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 113Race, Page 253Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 188Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 43Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 162Space, Page 191Race, Page 232Race, Page 230Race, Page 219Performance, Page 35Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 261Space, Page 190Labor, Page 131Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 177Space, Page 187Performance, Page 44Space, Page 178Space, Page 172Space, Page 197Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 304Introduction, Page 15Race, Page 239Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 165Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 34Race, Page 221Introduction, Page 1Race, Page 258Space, Page 181Labor, Page 128Space, Page 152Space, Page 195Race, Page 224Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 46Labor, Page 122Race, Page 247Space, Page 155Labor, Page 133Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 182Space, Page 137Performance, Page 42Introduction, Page 29Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 278Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 229Race, Page 206Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 129Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 16Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 54Space, Page 148Space, Page 183Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 47Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 252Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 300Race, Page 248Space, Page 171Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 292Space, Page 150Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 50Space, Page 175Race, Page 251Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 88Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 138Space, Page 141Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 132Conclusion, Page 296Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 123Race, Page 204Race, Page 254Labor, Page 98Space, Page 189Space, Page 146Space, Page 184Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 40Space, Page 193Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 291