Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 224Performance, Page 52Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 42Space, Page 183Labor, Page 123Race, Page 219Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 239Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 220Space, Page 194Race, Page 252Labor, Page 112Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 190Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 82Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 43Space, Page 187Performance, Page 50Labor, Page 109Introduction, Page 15Space, Page 181Race, Page 247Performance, Page 54Space, Page 197Race, Page 213Space, Page 184Labor, Page 88Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 253Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 128Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 178Space, Page 193Space, Page 195Space, Page 138Race, Page 251Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 165Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 60Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 34Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 254Space, Page 188Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 72Space, Page 162Space, Page 172Race, Page 232Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 131Introduction, Page 1Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 113Conclusion, Page 292Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 35Race, Page 229Labor, Page 122Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 129Race, Page 221Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 148Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 296Labor, Page 110Space, Page 177Space, Page 182Race, Page 204Race, Page 206Performance, Page 46Race, Page 235Space, Page 137Space, Page 191Labor, Page 132Space, Page 152Race, Page 261Performance, Page 40Space, Page 171Race, Page 258Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 225Performance, Page 44Space, Page 150Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 141Space, Page 175Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 47Space, Page 146Labor, Page 119