Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 225Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 82Race, Page 252Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 138Race, Page 248Labor, Page 128Space, Page 163Race, Page 220Performance, Page 42Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 296Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 187Space, Page 183Performance, Page 74Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 229Race, Page 230Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 34Space, Page 188Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 1Space, Page 190Space, Page 195Space, Page 141Space, Page 181Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 15Labor, Page 119Space, Page 148Race, Page 258Labor, Page 122Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 165Race, Page 261Performance, Page 40Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 286Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 224Race, Page 206Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 191Race, Page 247Space, Page 178Space, Page 177Space, Page 143Space, Page 172Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 284Performance, Page 46Introduction, Page 21Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 137Space, Page 175Space, Page 197Race, Page 204Space, Page 170Performance, Page 84Space, Page 152Race, Page 231Performance, Page 44Race, Page 251Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 41Race, Page 239Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 6Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 213Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 131Race, Page 235Space, Page 193Space, Page 162Labor, Page 112Space, Page 150Labor, Page 110Race, Page 232Performance, Page 47Race, Page 254Labor, Page 109Labor, Page 132Performance, Page 45Space, Page 184Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 16Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 155Space, Page 146Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 219Performance, Page 43Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 133Performance, Page 50Space, Page 171