Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

This page was created by Patricia Hill.  The last update was by Alice Xue.

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Introduction, Page 23

The form of minstrelsy nostalgically invoked in films such as Babes in Arms (1939) or Holiday Inn (1942) took shape following the Civil War.

In this scene from Babes in Arms, Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland perform their nostalgia for the good old days of minstrelsy. With a full marching band of people in blackface, minstrelsy is treated here as a memento, as Garland fondly recalls the days "when [George] Primrose was the king." This scene ends with Garland taking off her makeup to become 'white' again, uniting with her blackfaced lover as a storm blows in to wash the burnt cork off Rooney's face. 

Similarly, Holiday Inn scene offers a tribute in honor of Abraham Lincoln's birthday, performing Irving Berlin's  number "Abraham" as a blackface minstrel show. Not only are the two performers, Jim (Bing Crosby) and Linda (Marjorie Reynolds) in blackface, so is the entire band and all of the waiters and waitresses serving a white audience. The song details Lincoln's freeing of African American slaves. 

The scene features a counterpoint in which the inn's housekeeper, Mamie, sits in the kitchen singing the song to her two children. Her exclusion from the onstage performance, while she sings of black emancipation, deepens the racist irony of the scene.
Comment on this page

Discussion of "Introduction, Page 23"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Introduction, page 14 of 17 Next page on path

Related:  Race, Page 206Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 171Introduction, Page 21Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 298Performance, Page 60Space, Page 184Space, Page 183Performance, Page 45Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 163Race, Page 235Space, Page 141Conclusion, Page 273Space, Page 191Performance, Page 74Space, Page 177Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 44Space, Page 172Race, Page 230Introduction, Page 4Conclusion, Page 296Labor, Page 132Race, Page 224Labor, Page 133Race, Page 220Space, Page 143Space, Page 170Performance, Page 41Race, Page 253Space, Page 195Performance, Page 82Space, Page 182Race, Page 247Performance, Page 84Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 188Conclusion, Page 289Conclusion, Page 275Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 138Performance, Page 34Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 221Labor, Page 122Space, Page 150Performance, Page 47Race, Page 261Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 98Performance, Page 72Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 178Introduction, Page 16Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 290Introduction, Page 29Space, Page 194Race, Page 225Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 110Space, Page 181Space, Page 165Space, Page 193Race, Page 239Performance, Page 46Space, Page 148Race, Page 204Race, Page 254Race, Page 229Performance, Page 50Race, Page 219Labor, Page 129Labor, Page 113Space, Page 189Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 302Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 43Space, Page 137Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 252Space, Page 152Labor, Page 109Space, Page 146Performance, Page 40Race, Page 232Race, Page 258Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 251Race, Page 248Labor, Page 112Introduction, Page 6Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 15Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 131Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 119Space, Page 155Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 54