Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 286Performance, Page 52Race, Page 247Space, Page 141Space, Page 190Space, Page 150Space, Page 197Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 204Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 304Performance, Page 45Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 284Labor, Page 110Race, Page 248Performance, Page 56Race, Page 231Space, Page 177Space, Page 189Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 162Race, Page 258Space, Page 148Race, Page 239Race, Page 224Performance, Page 34Introduction, Page 21Labor, Page 98Space, Page 175Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 9Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 88Performance, Page 77Race, Page 206Labor, Page 112Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 187Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 84Introduction, Page 23Race, Page 221Performance, Page 46Space, Page 163Race, Page 253Labor, Page 123Race, Page 235Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 170Race, Page 254Space, Page 152Space, Page 181Performance, Page 78Conclusion, Page 289Space, Page 182Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 43Space, Page 155Space, Page 188Race, Page 230Conclusion, Page 302Race, Page 232Introduction, Page 14Race, Page 251Space, Page 143Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 74Space, Page 165Race, Page 220Performance, Page 47Race, Page 225Space, Page 178Performance, Page 42Space, Page 138Space, Page 172Labor, Page 128Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 229Performance, Page 72Space, Page 146Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 133Space, Page 193Labor, Page 129Space, Page 191Labor, Page 115Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 275Labor, Page 96Space, Page 183Performance, Page 41Introduction, Page 2Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 101Race, Page 213Introduction, Page 4Labor, Page 97Introduction, Page 30