Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 172Space, Page 143Conclusion, Page 298Space, Page 162Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 113Race, Page 229Labor, Page 119Space, Page 146Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 46Performance, Page 47Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 141Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 97Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 115Introduction, Page 14Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 56Labor, Page 123Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 52Space, Page 175Performance, Page 45Space, Page 148Labor, Page 109Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 290Conclusion, Page 292Labor, Page 101Space, Page 187Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 133Space, Page 178Introduction, Page 6Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 2Race, Page 258Labor, Page 110Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 77Introduction, Page 9Performance, Page 54Race, Page 247Space, Page 150Space, Page 152Space, Page 191Race, Page 221Race, Page 253Race, Page 251Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 302Space, Page 194Space, Page 190Race, Page 206Space, Page 165Performance, Page 72Race, Page 254Performance, Page 70Conclusion, Page 289Labor, Page 98Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 138Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 183Performance, Page 42Space, Page 181Performance, Page 82Space, Page 189Labor, Page 129Race, Page 225Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 182Space, Page 193Performance, Page 35Race, Page 248Labor, Page 88Space, Page 177Introduction, Page 23Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 170Race, Page 235Space, Page 155Labor, Page 96Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 230Performance, Page 43Race, Page 261Conclusion, Page 273Conclusion, Page 296Race, Page 224Labor, Page 132Race, Page 252Space, Page 188Introduction, Page 1Introduction, Page 30Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 60Race, Page 232Performance, Page 78Labor, Page 128Race, Page 213Race, Page 204Space, Page 163Performance, Page 41Race, Page 239Conclusion, Page 303