Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.

Comment on this page

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Space, Page 148Space, Page 177Race, Page 220Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 231Performance, Page 70Space, Page 182Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 172Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 54Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 129Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 291Race, Page 261Space, Page 143Space, Page 175Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 162Labor, Page 110Race, Page 252Space, Page 188Space, Page 150Race, Page 258Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 74Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 45Race, Page 251Introduction, Page 21Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 44Labor, Page 113Labor, Page 88Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 165Conclusion, Page 273Performance, Page 41Space, Page 181Performance, Page 78Race, Page 247Race, Page 204Race, Page 224Performance, Page 47Race, Page 206Performance, Page 82Race, Page 225Performance, Page 60Performance, Page 43Race, Page 239Introduction, Page 1Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 248Race, Page 230Conclusion, Page 298Race, Page 221Space, Page 187Space, Page 197Labor, Page 133Space, Page 194Conclusion, Page 284Space, Page 138Labor, Page 109Space, Page 178Introduction, Page 23Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 123Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 141Performance, Page 35Race, Page 253Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 296Labor, Page 98Race, Page 232Labor, Page 97Conclusion, Page 303Performance, Page 34Space, Page 155Performance, Page 56Space, Page 193Introduction, Page 29Labor, Page 122Performance, Page 77Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 96Space, Page 189Labor, Page 128Space, Page 190Race, Page 213Labor, Page 132Space, Page 152Performance, Page 72Performance, Page 46Space, Page 183Introduction, Page 9Labor, Page 119Race, Page 254Conclusion, Page 278Labor, Page 101Labor, Page 115Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 170Space, Page 163Introduction, Page 30Space, Page 191