Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 42Introduction, Page 2Labor, Page 97Space, Page 162Race, Page 225Race, Page 230Space, Page 175Introduction, Page 4Performance, Page 72Labor, Page 128Space, Page 181Space, Page 177Conclusion, Page 300Conclusion, Page 298Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 152Labor, Page 109Race, Page 247Space, Page 191Space, Page 143Race, Page 224Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 44Race, Page 235Space, Page 148Race, Page 220Race, Page 229Performance, Page 74Space, Page 146Performance, Page 56Race, Page 253Race, Page 248Performance, Page 47Space, Page 150Race, Page 206Race, Page 261Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 286Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 88Race, Page 231Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 122Race, Page 232Performance, Page 54Labor, Page 123Race, Page 251Performance, Page 77Space, Page 188Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 113Space, Page 165Performance, Page 34Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 172Labor, Page 112Labor, Page 98Race, Page 239Space, Page 178Labor, Page 129Conclusion, Page 302Performance, Page 35Labor, Page 96Conclusion, Page 291Space, Page 190Space, Page 141Race, Page 254Performance, Page 84Performance, Page 45Space, Page 193Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 163Space, Page 194Labor, Page 101Labor, Page 119Labor, Page 133Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 275Space, Page 155Conclusion, Page 273Labor, Page 110Race, Page 252Conclusion, Page 290Performance, Page 78Race, Page 221Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 138Race, Page 204Space, Page 187Performance, Page 82Labor, Page 115Performance, Page 70Space, Page 182Space, Page 197Performance, Page 60Race, Page 258Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 170Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 183Conclusion, Page 284Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 303Space, Page 189Introduction, Page 30Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 41