Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Performance, Page 74Labor, Page 98Space, Page 170Conclusion, Page 278Race, Page 247Performance, Page 35Performance, Page 54Space, Page 141Race, Page 225Performance, Page 84Conclusion, Page 289Race, Page 229Conclusion, Page 286Labor, Page 101Race, Page 206Race, Page 239Race, Page 251Performance, Page 43Labor, Page 112Space, Page 155Race, Page 204Performance, Page 41Space, Page 143Space, Page 187Conclusion, Page 302Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 82Performance, Page 70Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 72Conclusion, Page 300Space, Page 178Conclusion, Page 304Space, Page 175Space, Page 177Performance, Page 52Labor, Page 115Introduction, Page 14Labor, Page 110Conclusion, Page 291Labor, Page 88Space, Page 152Labor, Page 133Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 34Performance, Page 44Race, Page 230Race, Page 258Race, Page 254Space, Page 150Space, Page 162Space, Page 189Space, Page 148Introduction, Page 4Space, Page 193Race, Page 231Race, Page 221Space, Page 194Performance, Page 47Race, Page 235Labor, Page 113Performance, Page 42Performance, Page 46Space, Page 181Performance, Page 56Space, Page 146Labor, Page 122Space, Page 172Introduction, Page 23Labor, Page 128Performance, Page 77Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 253Conclusion, Page 298Labor, Page 97Introduction, Page 9Introduction, Page 2Performance, Page 45Conclusion, Page 292Race, Page 220Introduction, Page 6Race, Page 232Space, Page 190Conclusion, Page 273Race, Page 252Race, Page 213Conclusion, Page 275Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 138Space, Page 163Performance, Page 78Space, Page 183Race, Page 224Space, Page 188Race, Page 261Space, Page 165Labor, Page 129Performance, Page 60Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 182Labor, Page 132Space, Page 191Labor, Page 119Race, Page 248Conclusion, Page 303Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 96Space, Page 197