Sign in or register
for additional privileges

Birth of An Industry: Blackface Minstrelsy and the Rise of American Animation

Nicholas Sammond, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Performance, Page 50

When he designed both Little Nemo (1911), Winsor McCay chose to retain the conceit of the lightning-sketch as the motivating force from which his animation sprang. McCay played himself as animator, a character somewhere between a circus ringmaster and an interlocutor in a blackface minstrel show.

The setup for his early shorts was simple: McCay would make a bet with friends and fellow artists such as George McManus and Tom Powers, or comic film star John Bunny, about his ability to make still drawings come to life. A series of scenes then laid out the intense labor of cartooning, with McCay as the sole craftsman toiling over thousands of drawings, aided only by bumbling assistants. These performance films offered the spectacle of melding two distinct modes of presenting the act of animation, the lightning sketch and the cartoon proper.


Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Performance, Page 50"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Performance, page 10 of 25 Next page on path

Related:  Labor, Page 123Performance, Page 46Conclusion, Page 284Introduction, Page 21Space, Page 150Space, Page 141Race, Page 230Space, Page 143Space, Page 189Space, Page 162Conclusion, Page 291Performance, Page 56Race, Page 213Race, Page 225Performance, Page 42Labor, Page 113Introduction, Page 2Space, Page 191Conclusion, Page 300Performance, Page 60Labor, Page 128Space, Page 182Race, Page 206Race, Page 239Conclusion, Page 298Introduction, Page 9Space, Page 138Space, Page 165Space, Page 170Race, Page 231Conclusion, Page 289Performance, Page 82Space, Page 177Performance, Page 84Labor, Page 98Conclusion, Page 303Labor, Page 110Space, Page 181Space, Page 187Performance, Page 54Introduction, Page 1Performance, Page 72Space, Page 146Conclusion, Page 286Space, Page 175Race, Page 253Labor, Page 97Performance, Page 44Race, Page 220Labor, Page 115Space, Page 155Space, Page 178Performance, Page 35Race, Page 258Race, Page 251Race, Page 204Performance, Page 74Performance, Page 34Race, Page 235Conclusion, Page 278Space, Page 193Space, Page 148Race, Page 247Race, Page 248Race, Page 232Labor, Page 112Performance, Page 77Labor, Page 109Performance, Page 78Performance, Page 47Labor, Page 133Space, Page 152Space, Page 172Labor, Page 129Introduction, Page 29Conclusion, Page 275Performance, Page 70Race, Page 229Space, Page 194Introduction, Page 6Conclusion, Page 302Introduction, Page 14Space, Page 190Introduction, Page 4Race, Page 221Performance, Page 45Race, Page 224Race, Page 252Performance, Page 43Race, Page 254Labor, Page 132Labor, Page 119Conclusion, Page 290Race, Page 261Labor, Page 88Space, Page 188Labor, Page 96Labor, Page 122Conclusion, Page 296Space, Page 183Space, Page 197Introduction, Page 23Space, Page 163Conclusion, Page 292Performance, Page 52Conclusion, Page 304Conclusion, Page 273Introduction, Page 30Labor, Page 101Performance, Page 41