Thanks for your patience during our recent outage at scalar.usc.edu. While Scalar content is loading normally now, saving is still slow, and Scalar's 'additional metadata' features have been disabled, which may interfere with features like timelines and maps that depend on metadata. This also means that saving a page or media item will remove its additional metadata. If this occurs, you can use the 'All versions' link at the bottom of the page to restore the earlier version. We are continuing to troubleshoot, and will provide further updates as needed. Note that this only affects Scalar projects at scalar.usc.edu, and not those hosted elsewhere.
SENĆOŦEN: A Grammar of the Saanich Language

40 Cause

All languages have patterns in their grammars for expressing the important notion of cause. English has many ways of expressing this notion, but we can identify three general ways English expresses cause in a sentence.

The most common way to express cause in English is with a verb that means basically ‘cause.’ For example, we can say ‘I caused him to eat,’ ‘I made him eat,’ ‘I had him eat,’ and many other ways of getting this idea that ‘I’ was the cause of him eating.

Another way English expresses cause is through verbs that have the notion of cause built into the meaning. For example, the sentence ‘I fed him’ means ‘I caused him to eat.’ We say that ‘feed’ is the causative of ‘eat’ since ‘feed’ means ‘cause to eat.’ Most English verbs, though, have no special causative form. For many verbs, like ‘sleep,’ you just have to use a ‘cause’ verb phrase like ‘put to sleep’ to express the ‘cause’ idea.

A third way of expressing cause in English is used with many intransitive verbs. Verbs like ‘walk’ are causative when they are transitive, and noncausative when they are intransitive. For example, ‘I walked’ is intransitive (no direct object) and there is no idea of ‘cause’ involved. But ‘I walked the dog’ is transitive (‘the dog’ is the object) and also expresses the idea that I caused the dog to walk.

SENĆOŦEN also has three basic ways of expressing ‘cause’ in a sentence, but they are all quite different from the ways English does it. In fact, SENĆOŦEN entirely lacks the three methods used by English. SENĆOŦEN has no verbs like ‘caused’ or ‘made’ to make sentences like ‘I made him eat,’ it has no words like ‘feed’ with a ‘cause’ meaning built in, and intransitive verbs can never be used with a ‘cause’ meaning, like English ‘walk the dog.’ As you will see in this section, SENĆOŦEN uses suffixes on the verb to express cause.

The SENĆOŦEN causative suffixes are transitivizers. Like the ET and NEW̱ suffixes (§32.1 and §32.2), the causative suffixes are added to an intransitive verb to create a transitive verb—a verb that an object suffix can attach to.

The causative is usually only added to intransitive verbs, but it is possible to add the ‘let’ causative to a transitive. See the points in §40.3 for an example. Otherwise, it is not grammatical to add a causative to a word that is already transitive. To say something like ‘I made him feed the dog,’ you would have to say it indirectly using the ‘that’s why’ construction (§39.1), as in SÁT SEN; NIȽ ȻEĆÁ ŚW̱¸EȽENISTW̱S TŦE SḴAXE¸ ‘I told him to; that’s why he fed the dog.’
 

This page has paths:

  1. PART 3 SENĆOŦEN Grammatical Patterns Montler, et al.

Contents of this path:

  1. 40.1. Agent causative: -ISTW̱
  2. 40.2. Inanimate causative: -TW̱
  3. 40.3. Let causative: -TW̱
  4. 40.4. Location causative: -ÁS

This page has tags:

  1. 32.2. Object pronouns (subject not in control): NEW̱ verbs Montler, et al.
  2. 12.6. ‘Not let’ and a subordinate clause Montler, et al.
  3. 16.2. ‘Do what with?’ Montler, et al.
  4. 35.3. Middle with just one participant Montler, et al.
  5. 52 Reporting Verbs and Direct Quotes Montler, et al.
  6. 58.2. -TOW̱ ‘object of emotion’ Montler, et al.
  7. 25.2. ‘Where put?’ ‘Where take?’ ‘Where get?’ Montler, et al.
  8. 61.4. Greeting and Leave Taking Montler, et al.
  9. 58 Objects of Intent and Emotion Montler, et al.

Contents of this tag:

  1. 32.2. Object pronouns (subject not in control): NEW̱ verbs
  2. 32.1. Object pronouns (subject in control): ET verbs
  3. 40.3. Let causative: -TW̱
  4. 39.1. That’s why: NIȽ ȻECÁ ŚW̱-