This page has paths:

1. 1 2013-11-16T22:12:19-08:00 Jentery Sayers becbfb529bffcfafdfad6920ed57b30ccdca5339 Notes Jentery Sayers 2 Notes for the Article plain 2013-11-17T09:02:31-08:00 Jentery Sayers becbfb529bffcfafdfad6920ed57b30ccdca5339

This page is referenced by:

• 1 2013-10-18T12:58:57-07:00 Responding to Edison’s Noise 12 Smith Was Prompted to Develop Magnetic Recording after Visiting Edison’s Menlo Park Laboratory plain 2013-12-26T09:18:21-08:00 In the history of technologies before and after 1888, a drive toward the abstraction and standardization of both information and perception is certainly nothing novel. However, what makes the case of early magnetic recording unique is that Oberlin Smith bundled that abstraction and standardization with a critique of mechanical noise, which abraded cultured ears as it revealed technical flaws. One such flaw was the friction between a needle and groove caused during the playback of mechanically recorded sound inscribed on tinfoil. As magnetic audio historian Mark H. Clark notes in “The Magnetic Recording of Sound,” Oberlin Smith visited Thomas Edison’s Menlo Park laboratory in early 1878, ten years prior to his publication in Electrical World and just after Edison patented the cylinder phonograph (1999c, 7). 
  While examining Edison’s new device, Smith was struck by a scratchy noise generated during playback. It was a noise that mechanical recordings simply could not avoid, and it offended Smith’s ears. As a response, he proposed magnetic recording, where no audible, physical contact would be made between the storage medium (for example, thread) and the playback mechanism (for example, an electromagnet).