#62, don’t look
“We come to this cultural, political and media onslaught as individuals but, it is my contention that each of us must take responsibility for our own acts of looking. When we look (or write) we engage in the regimes of visibility—complex networks of power, ownership, and access that frame our viewing and knowing—that surround and inform violence. Accounting for our place, our needs, our actions in the face of viral videos of murder is one within a constellation of necessary ethical and political acts. This is particularly true because it may feel like our current media conditions of onslaught and abundance allow us no choices at all. When we have the choice to look, we are bound ethically and politically to what we witness and what we do with all we have seen. Below is a brief primer of ways to understand how or why we might (not) look.”
In that article, I share these principled positions: Don’t Look, Look Askance, Look at Death, and Look at Death’s Platforms and connect these to deeper traditions of thinking about practices of looking.
See More:
- How Do I (Not) Look? Live Feed Video and Viral Black Death,” Alexandra Juhasz
- “The UnWar Film,” Alisa Lebow
- Gendered Tropes in War Photography, Marta Zarzycka
- “The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance,” Manuel Castells
- “The Production of Outrage: The Iraq War and the Radical Documentary Tradition, Jane Gaines
- Dying in Full Detail: Mortality and Digital Documentary, Jennifer Malkowski
- The Right to Look, Nicholas Mirzoeff
- Practices of Looking, Lisa Cartwright and Marita Sturken
- #100hardtruths-#fakenews: a primer on digital media literacy