This page has paths:

1. 1 2013-11-26T14:30:08-08:00 Jentery Sayers becbfb529bffcfafdfad6920ed57b30ccdca5339 Media Jentery Sayers 9 Media for “Making the Perfect Record,” American Literature 85.4 (December 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2370230, Duke U P plain 8387 2014-01-03T13:32:03-08:00 Jentery Sayers becbfb529bffcfafdfad6920ed57b30ccdca5339

This page is referenced by:

• 1 2013-10-12T17:09:15-07:00 Scratchy Noise 8 Smith Publishes His Response to Edison’s Phonograph Ten Years after Visiting Menlo Park plain 2013-12-26T18:24:46-08:00 Smith’s response to Edison’s phonograph was written in a memorandum dated September 23, 1878, roughly ten years prior to the publication of “Some Possible Forms of Phonograph” in Electrical World. The memorandum is reproduced in Clark’s “The Magnetic Recording of Sound” (1999c, 8). Why Smith took ten years to publish his hypotheses is difficult to determine. One reason may be that by 1888 he realized he had neither the time nor the resources to dedicate to magnetic recording. (This note comments on the page titled, “Responding to Edison’s Noise,” as well as the attached image titled, “Some Possible Forms of Phonograph.”)
• 1 2013-10-12T17:13:12-07:00 “Talk Back” 6 Manual Playback Meets the Perfect Record plain 2013-12-26T18:28:55-08:00 Redrawing the cord through the helix at exactly the same speed of the recording would be incredibly difficult (if not impossible) to manage if the device was operated by hand.
  (This note comments on the page titled, “Fidelity and Deceit,” as well as the attached image titled, “Some Possible Forms of Phonograph.”)
• 1 2013-10-12T17:12:54-07:00 His Writings on Magnetic Recording 5 Smith’s Notes Were Destroyed in Two Separate Fires plain 2013-12-26T18:33:17-08:00 One reason they are unsure is that Smith’s lab notes and memoranda were lost in two separate fires.
  (This note comments on the page titled, “Not a Worthwhile Investment,” as well as the attached image titled, “Some Possible Forms of Phonograph (1888).”)