Making the Perfect Record: From Inscription to Impression in Early Magnetic RecordingMain MenuAboutAbstract for “Making the Perfect Record,” American Literature 85.4 (December 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2370230, Duke U PIntroductionIntroduction to Making the Perfect Record: From Inscription to Impression in Early Magnetic RecordingNotesNotes for “Making the Perfect Record,” American Literature 85.4 (December 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2370230, Duke U PMediaMedia for “Making the Perfect Record,” American Literature 85.4 (December 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2370230, Duke U PAcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments for “Making the Perfect Record,” American Literature 85.4 (December 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2370230, Duke U PTechnical InformationTechnical Information for “Making the Perfect Record,” American Literature 85.4 (December 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2370230, Duke U PReferencesReferences for “Making the Perfect Record,” American Literature 85.4 (December 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2370230, Duke U PJentery Sayersbecbfb529bffcfafdfad6920ed57b30ccdca5339This essay is part of the “New Media” special issue of American Literature (volume 85, number 4, December 2013). See http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2370230. Version 1 of the site is (c) 2013 by Duke University Press.
The Telegraphone at the Franklin Institute (1909)
12013-12-13T18:03:12-08:00Jentery Sayersbecbfb529bffcfafdfad6920ed57b30ccdca53392495Charles K. Fankhauser, “The Telegraphone,” Journal of the Franklin Institute (1909), 37plain2013-12-27T04:55:41-08:00Jentery Sayersbecbfb529bffcfafdfad6920ed57b30ccdca5339
This page has paths:
12013-11-26T14:30:08-08:00Jentery Sayersbecbfb529bffcfafdfad6920ed57b30ccdca5339MediaJentery Sayers9Media for “Making the Perfect Record,” American Literature 85.4 (December 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00029831-2370230, Duke U Pplain83872014-01-03T13:32:03-08:00Jentery Sayersbecbfb529bffcfafdfad6920ed57b30ccdca5339
This page is referenced by:
12013-10-14T12:03:12-07:00The Human Stenographer5The limits of human stenographers are highlighted in the August 1913 issue of the Independentplain2013-12-19T18:44:13-08:00In an August 1913 issue of the Independent, the limits of human stenographers working in similar situations are actually highlighted: “The advantages of [the telegraphone] for international conventions is [sic] obvious. It is very hard to get stenographers competent to take down the discussions in four or more languages. The Copenhagen congress was in session forty hours altogether and occupied two adjoining rooms, but all of the papers and discussions were duly recorded on the 250 kilometers of piano wire” (“The Telegraphone”).
(This note comments on the page titled, "Imagining Applications," as well as the attached image titled, "The Telegraphone at the Franklin Institute (1908).")
12013-10-14T11:42:48-07:00Potential Applications4A working model of the telegraphone was presented to attendees of the talkplain2013-12-19T18:40:50-08:00After the talk, a demonstration of the telegraphone (both the wire-based and disk-based versions) was given. Fankhauser was an official agent of the American Telegraphone Company.
12013-10-14T11:46:59-07:00A Variety of Conjectures4Fankhauser conjectures about the future of the telegraph, the telephone, and commercial stenography in light of the telegraphone's emergenceplain2013-12-19T18:42:29-08:00On the limits of the telegraph, Fankhauser (1909, 41) claims: “Already the telegraph . . . is on the wane; but its complete substitution has heretofore been impossible because of the fact that it is absolutely necessary on important divisions that there should be evidence.” On the limits of the telephone: “It has always been a drawback to the general use of the telephone, that the messages transmitted have been wholly evanescent, that it has been impossible to preserve or present an authentic record of conversation over the wire” (40). On the rise of mechanical or commercial stenography: “The field here is growing constantly, as it has been demonstrated that there may be effected not alone an enormous saving in actual money, but in time, and accuracy, that is, with the aid of the talk-machine, the correspondent can dictate from two to three times as many letters as he can through the medium of the stenographer” (43).
(This note comments on the page titled, "Imagining Applications," as well as the attached image titled, "The Telegraphone at the Franklin Institute (1908).")