Space, Place, and Mapping ILA387 Spring 2016Main MenuAnales de Tlatelolco (Anonymous, 1540-1560)Historia tolteca-chichimeca (Anales de Cuauhtinchan. Anonymous, 1550-1560)Anales de Cuauhtitlán (Anonymous, c. 1570)Codex Aubin (Anonymous, c. 1576)Anales de Tecamachalco (Anonymous, c. 1590)Clendinnen, I: “‘Fierce and Unnatural Cruelty’: Cortés and the Conquest of México"Secondary SourceLockhart, J: The Nahuas After the Conquest: A Social and Cultural History of the Indians of Central Mexico, Sixteenth Through Eighteenth CenturiesSecondary SourceLockhart, J.: We People Here. Nahuatl Accounts of the Conquest of MexicoSecondary SourceMcDonough, K.: The Learned Ones. Nahua Intellectuals in Postconquest MexicoSecondary SourceMcDonough, K.: “‘Love’ Lost: Class Struggle among Indigenous Nobles and Commoners of Seventeenth-Century Tlaxcala”Secondary SourceMegged, A. & Wood, S.: Mesoamerican Memory. Enduring Systems of RemembranceSecondary SourceRestall, M.: “The New Conquest History” in History Compass 10:12Secondary SourceSchroeder, S. (Ed): The Conquest All Over Again. Nahuas and Zapotecs Thinking, Writing, and Painting Spanish ColonialismSecondary SourceTownsend, C.: Here in This year. Seventeenth-Century Nahuatl Annals of the Tlaxcala-Puebla ValleySecondary SourceWood, S.: Transcending Conquest. Nahua Views of Spanish Colonial MexicoSecondary SourceKelly McDonougha6b175ff7fbe5e5898695a43d2f9a5602d0c5760
In this article Callahan and Johnson state that media has the ability to extend cultural perspectives, including the cultures of marginalized people. The Garifuna People are marginalized in both their native countries and in the United States, falling in the in between of not being African American, White or the “traditional” mestizo. Although they are indigenous their black skin removes them from the unification of their mestizo based countries. This creates a cognitive need to orientate themselves in an environment where they can express themselves. Before the boom of Facebook 2007 it was as if the Garifuna outside of academia was left out of the global conversation. The authors chose to study Garifuna people because there is not much published articles about them and the Garifuna succeeded to varying degrees in maintaining their identity and languages, despite the pressure from surrounding host cultures and languages (Callahan & Johnson 322). In this study the subject pool was limited to Honduras, disregarding the population across Guatemala, Belize, Nicaragua, and the United States. This hypothesis cannot be generalized. The significance of this work is Callahan and Johnson defend and prove that the younger generation (16-35) have taken over organization and forming unity across borders. This illuminates the use of Facebook for building community and communication in the Garifuna community. The dependency on social media is a current resource that expands the reach of the Garifuna communication; they are no longer limited by the need of a calling card. Although many do not have internet access in their homes, through their phones and social hot spots they are all connected to each other.
They continue their idea in 2015 with the statement that Garifuna people continue to cluster together in homogenous grouping centered in large cities (75). Callahan and Johnson make reference to the double consciousness of minorities as presented by Du Bois, where the two identities conflict with each other in America. The limitation of this article is their use of terms such as “American sense of consciousness”; this separates American from blackness hence making the foundation of American identity whiteness. Through open- ended interview questions in the Garifuna community. Through this interviews they realized that Garifuna people experienced a double consciousness prior to immigrating to the United States. (Check Black Atlantic for explanation).
"Social Media has become a powerful toll in helping the Garifuna Keep grounded in their culture, while adapting to culture in their new surroundings" (Callahan, Johnson 95). "They have begun to create a supraterritorial space inside social media for Garifuna social expression. This space spans various social media outlets and has allowed Garifuna from all over the world to connect with each other" (Callahan, Johnson 331).
Johnson, Jared L., and Clark Callahan. "Minority Cultures and Social Media: Magnifying Garifuna." Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 42.4 (2013): 319-39. Print. Johnson, Jared L., and Clark Callahan. "Media and Identity in the Margins: The Garifuna Response to Social Media." The Journal of Social Media in Society 4.2 (2015): 73-105. Print.
This page has paths:
1media/35-virginia-castillo.jpg2016-01-20T12:30:26-08:00Kelly McDonougha6b175ff7fbe5e5898695a43d2f9a5602d0c5760Daisy: The Modern Garifuna; A new culture formed on the InternetDaisy Guzman23Cyberspace as a native hub for the garifuna community, for beliefs, performance, community, language and social support.image_header2016-04-28T13:47:19-07:00Daisy Guzmand105b185db229bf2fc278c38dfb2ad9906efdee8
This page has tags:
12016-01-31T19:21:06-08:00Maria Victoria Fernandezb7ddf1da0116ba2a8c78410690d8b79f484ac28cmodernityMaria Victoria Fernandez2modernityplain2016-01-31T19:21:26-08:00Maria Victoria Fernandezb7ddf1da0116ba2a8c78410690d8b79f484ac28c
12016-03-22T09:44:15-07:00Ana Maria Navas Mendez17a2464a93be5c6a9395aaa9b4bdd238ef2d85edImaginario espacialAna Maria Navas Mendez1Imaginario espacialplain2016-03-22T09:44:15-07:00Ana Maria Navas Mendez17a2464a93be5c6a9395aaa9b4bdd238ef2d85ed