12019-04-16T17:59:11-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e123323021plain2019-09-10T18:26:47-07:00Christina J. Hodgeb0448a0ebf7b6fff7b74ba40ef2cdd594c9bfcf9
The student curators of Our Dark Materials discovered a paradox: attentiveness to objects does not necessarily replace an interest in people. Rather, scrutiny of the material qualities of things can actually bring the people who made and used those things closer to mind.
How did they create these pieces of stone, bronze, ceramic, and organic materials? What technologies did they employ; what decisions did they make? What larger forces shaped their individual expressions? These questions apply equally to common things and those of rare wealth and consequence.
Contents of this annotation:
12019-05-13T18:02:10-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Soul House, Fragments (21364.3)13While the rich and powerful were buried in tombs of stone, ancient Egyptians with smaller budgets buried their loved ones underneath a soul house like this one. These models represented shelter and offerings to sustain the deceased. A complete example is shown in a nearby picture. The fragments displayed here represent the deceased individual with a table and bowls of food, alongside cuts of meat. The rough fabric and cursory shaping of the clay highlight the common status of the recipient. This item was destroyed in the earthquake of 1906, but its surviving fragments are whole enough for interpretation. While the craftsman paid little attention to detail, this soul house was sturdy enough to fulfill its purposes: to survive the tests of time and provide continual offerings to the buried in the afterlife.media/soul house fragments 213642.pngplain2019-06-24T07:28:08-07:001994-1781 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 21364.3Archaeology; AfricaEarthenware (terra cotta)Stanford UniversityCollected by Mrs. Émile Brugsch on unknown date prior to 1901; donated to Stanford ca. 1902 and before 1906 by Jane Lathrop StanfordTwelfth Dynasty; Gebelein, New Valley Governorate, EgyptPharaonic Egyptian, Middle KingdomEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-03-07T07:13:42-08:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Cartonnage Fragments (22231)13This coffin covering was intended to protect the remains of a woman—likely named Senchalanthos—for eternity. What remains after the 1906 earthquake flattened Stanford’s museum is a puzzle of missing pieces, never to be completed. Among hundreds of fragments, we find: bright flower-shaped patterns, depictions of four funerary gods, and writing scrawled onto the cartonnage. The Demotic inscription reads: “May her name be rejuvenated every day.” In recognizing her name in this exhibit, we hope to rejuvenate her spirit.media/22231-2.jpgplain2019-06-14T22:01:12-07:00ca. 100 BCE-100 CEPhysical objectObject ID 22231Archaeology; AfricaPigment; felted flax; linen; plasterStanford UniversityPurchased by Jane Lathrop Stanford from N. D. Kyticas in 1901 and donated to Stanford before 1905Late Ptolemaic; Early RomanHellenistic or Roman EgyptianChristina J. Hodgeb0448a0ebf7b6fff7b74ba40ef2cdd594c9bfcf9
12019-03-07T07:16:06-08:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Egyptian Funerary Mask (22224)10These fragments preserve the image of an unknown individual in their ultimate, mummified state. Per artistic convention, the thick linear pattern, seen on both the mask and larger surrounding fragments, symbolizes the bandage wrappings encompassing the deceased. It likely framed other designs, including of the sister goddesses Iris and Nephthys. Although now divorced from the body, this cartonnage revitalizes the deceased through the pictorial and symbolic representations of them in life, death, and afterlife.media/22224-6 (1).jpgplain2019-06-14T22:06:43-07:001549-1292 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 22224Archaeology; AfricaPlaster; linen; paint; gilt; varnishStanford UniversityPurchased by Jane Lathrop Stanford from N. D. Kyticas in 1901 and donated before 1905Eighteenth DynastyPharaonic Egyptian, New KingdomChristina J. Hodgeb0448a0ebf7b6fff7b74ba40ef2cdd594c9bfcf9
12019-05-13T17:47:40-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Miniature Earthenware Vessel (20751)10This small vessel is a model of a larger one and was intended for a funerary setting, probably of a modest person who could not afford full-sized accompaniments. With a rim opening only large enough to barely fit one finger inside, it is evidently too small to contain any liquids or food. Its hand-built construction is evident by the unbalanced base and thickly textured walls. That this object was neither thrown nor coiled suggests its early creation by a potter in Pre-dynastic Egypt.media/miniature earthenware vessel 20751.pngplain2019-06-24T07:32:00-07:00ca. 3800-3200 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID 20751Arhcaeology; AfricaEarthenwareStanford UniversityExcavated for the Egypt Exploration Fund during a 1906 to 1909 expedition; sent to Timothy Hopkins, who donated it to Stanford in 1911Naqada I-III; Abydos, New Valley Governorate, EgyptNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-03-07T07:17:24-08:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Egyptian Funerary Mask (22224)9These fragments preserve the image of an unknown individual in their ultimate, mummified state. Per artistic convention, the thick linear pattern, seen on both the mask and larger surrounding fragments, symbolizes the bandage wrappings encompassing the deceased. It likely framed other designs, including of the sister goddesses Iris and Nephthys. Although now divorced from the body, this cartonnage revitalizes the deceased through the pictorial and symbolic representations of them in life, death, and afterlife.media/22224-4.jpgplain2019-06-22T10:28:02-07:001549-1292 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 22224Archaeology; AfricaPlaster; linen; paint; gilt; varnishStanford UniversityPurchased by Jane Lathrop Stanford from N. D. Kyticas in 1901 and donated before 1905Eighteenth DynastyPharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-13T18:10:11-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Refined Earthenware Vessel (T2018.2.4)9Although this vessel was rediscovered recently with no identification, its material qualities illuminate its life’s details. Most Egyptian ceramics have a round base, but this vessel has a footring. Since footrings start appearing in the Ptolemaic period, this detail suggests that this vessel came from this period or later. The remarkable thinness of its walls suggests that a professional threw this vessel for sale to a wealthy individual.media/refined earthenware vessel t201824.pngplain2019-06-24T07:29:39-07:00post ca. 305 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID T2018.2.4Arhcaeology; AfricaEarthenware (refined)Stanford UniversityFound in collections in 2018Ptolemaic or later; EgyptHellenistic or later EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-04-17T02:34:24-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Spouted Vessel, Partial (21103)8This object is remarkable not for its trivial purpose or simple construction but for the careful efforts put into its conservation. The hole on its upper body marks a loss. It was originally a “spouted vessel” used to hold and pour liquid. When whole, it resembled the complete Pre-dynastic vessel (ca. 3500 BCE) shown in the accompanying image. Despite missing parts, inexpert mends, scratches, and damage, considerable effort was put into this vessel’s restoration in the early twentieth century when conservation practices weren’t as advanced as they are now. This determination highlights the importance of the vessel to the collector. We find value in the effort that went into making this common, simple vessel whole again.media/21103 in ex.jpgplain2019-06-05T10:12:50-07:005000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 21103Archaeology; AfricaEarthenwareStanford UniversityExcavated by William M. Flinders Petrie during an Egypt Exploration Fund project in 1894–1895; acquired by Timothy Hopkins, who donated the work to Stanford prior to 1939Pre-dynastic; EgyptNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:12:00-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Amulet of Osiris (17215)7The versatility of metal allowed craftsmen creatively to form the ubiquitous Osiris in varying poses. Osiris, one of the most popular gods of the Egyptian pantheon, was perceived during his lifetime as the incarnation of the principal god Horus and became Osiris after death. Osiris was eventually equated with all deceased individuals and became a symbol of resurrection, making him one of the most common deities to be formed as a funerary object. Bronze figurines of Osiris take two basic forms: seated or standing. There are also three common arm positions: crossed; fists touching; and right arm over left. This placement may be associated with different geographical regions in Egypt. Smaller bronze Osiris figurines cast with a loop were worn as amulets, kept close to the body in life and death to bestow protection, healing, and luck. The most technical of the three forms, the amulet required precision and advanced casting techniques in order to create the rear suspension ring.media/17215.jpgplain2019-06-05T08:51:58-07:003050-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 17215Archaeology; AfricaBronzeStanford UniversityPurchased by Leland Stanford Jr. in 1883 and donated by Jane Lathrop Stanford in 1891DynasticPharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-14T23:44:52-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Figurine of Osiris (66.256)7The versatility of metal allowed craftsmen creatively to form the ubiquitous Osiris in varying poses. Osiris, one of the most popular gods of the Egyptian pantheon, was perceived during his lifetime as the incarnation of the principal god Horus and became Osiris after death. Osiris was eventually equated with all deceased individuals and became a symbol of resurrection, making him one of the most common deities to be formed as a funerary object. Bronze figurines of Osiris take two basic forms: seated or standing. There are also three common arm positions: crossed; fists touching; and right arm over left. This placement may be associated with different geographical regions in Egypt. Smaller bronze Osiris figurines cast with a loop were worn as amulets, kept close to the body in life and death to bestow protection, healing, and luck. The most technical of the three forms, the amulet required precision and advanced casting techniques in order to create the rear suspension ring.media/figurine of osiris 66256.pngplain2019-06-24T09:01:55-07:003050-332 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID 66.256Arhcaeology; AfricaBronzeStanford UniversityFound in collections in 1966DynasticPharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:02:52-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Arrowhead (20141)7Stone tools are often considered strong and lasting. These arrowheads are an example of tools meant to break. The barbs on the side were very difficult to remove from flesh, often breaking off in the process.media/20141.JPGplain2019-06-05T18:41:05-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20141Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heywood Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:08:08-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Crocodile Figurine, Partial (20824)7This figurine is the Egyptian crocodile god Suchus (a.k.a. Sobek) missing his snout. The picture of a complete version from the same site is shown nearby. As it is an object meant for worship, it may seem odd that the object is so roughly constructed. For instance, when looking at the top of the object, one can clearly see the join between the figurine’s two molded sides. This careless construction elucidates that this object was intended for commoners. Such figurines were mass-produced for worshipers of Suchus to put on their altars at home.media/20824 in ex-min.jpgplain2019-06-05T18:58:51-07:00337-361 CEPhysical objectObject ID 20824Archaeology; AfricaEarthenware (terra cotta)Stanford UniversityExcavated by William M. Flinders Petrie on behalf of the Egypt Exploration Fund in 1903–1904; donated to Stanford by Timothy Hopkins in 1905Roman, around the reign of Constantius II; Ehnasya (a.k.a. Heracleopolis Magna), Beni Suef Governorate, EgyptRoman EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:25:10-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Sarcophagus or Coffin Fragments (T2017.7.2)7Despite lacking provenance, these fragments provide significant interpretive possibility. They show the layout and ritual scenes typical of yellow-varnished coffins. White linen robes and a leopard’s-fur wrap identify the disembodied figures as priests. Hieroglyphs run along flat, abstract surfaces. They suggest the formulaic “[Osiris] ruler-of-eternity” and reference the heart, seat of intelligence, memory, and action. Painted plaster has given way to fractured wood. Originally unseen, the fragments now invite us to study construction, materiality, and socioeconomic context.media/T201772-2 EDIT.jpgplain2019-06-22T10:44:53-07:001298-743 BCEPhysical objectObject ID T2017.7.2Archaeology; AfricaWood; paint; plaster; varnishStanford UniversityFound in collections in 2017Nineteenth through Twenty-second Dynasty; EgyptPharaonic Egyptian, New Kingdom or Third IntermediateEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:14:57-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Figurine of Osiris (20513)6The versatility of metal allowed craftsmen creatively to form the ubiquitous Osiris in varying poses. Osiris, one of the most popular gods of the Egyptian pantheon, was perceived during his lifetime as the incarnation of the principal god Horus and became Osiris after death. Osiris was eventually equated with all deceased individuals and became a symbol of resurrection, making him one of the most common deities to be formed as a funerary object. Bronze figurines of Osiris take two basic forms: seated or standing. There are also three common arm positions: crossed; fists touching; and right arm over left. This placement may be associated with different geographical regions in Egypt. Smaller bronze Osiris figurines cast with a loop were worn as amulets, kept close to the body in life and death to bestow protection, healing, and luck. The most technical of the three forms, the amulet required precision and advanced casting techniques in order to create the rear suspension ring.media/20513-2 EDIT (1).JPGplain2019-06-22T10:24:53-07:003050-332 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID 20513Archaeology; AfricaBronzeStanford UniversityEntered the Stanford collections before 1939DynasticPharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-04-17T02:38:32-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Mirror (21482)6Pharaonic Egyptians were quite self-aware and conscious of their appearance, making mirrors a commonplace item among the elite in both life and death. Mirror handles varied in material and decoration. Men favored fewer embellishments than women. A close look at this mirror reveals a crosshatch pattern indented in its surface, evidence of its fabrication through hammering. Although no longer reflective, its common form creates a seamless connection between ancient Egyptian culture and contemporary society.media/21482-2.jpgplain2019-06-22T10:44:18-07:002160–1994 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 21482Archaeology; AfricaIron; SilverStanford UniversityGift of Jane Lathrop Stanford prior to 1905Eleventh Dynasty; EgyptPharaonic Egyptian, First Intermediate through Middle KingdomEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-03-07T07:17:57-08:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Ceremonial Knife (21861)6Flint knapping is the art of chipping away material from flint or other fracturing stone to create sharp points or tools. An example of flint knapping at its finest, this ceremonial blade was made in pre-Dynastic Egypt, possibly as an honored burial item as it shows no wear. Blades like this are often discounted as primitive and unsophisticated because they’re made of stone. However, the perfect strokes and precise pressure flaking indicates that this blade was made by a sophisticated professional craftsman.media/21861.jpgplain2019-06-05T09:17:27-07:00ca. 3500-3100 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 21861Archaeology; AfricaFlint or chertStanford UniversityCollected by Mohammed Ali el Gabri in 1902, sold to Jane Lathrop Stanford in 1904, and donated to the Stanford Museum before 1905Naqada IINeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:26:26-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Sarcophagus or Coffin Fragments (T2017.7.5)5Despite lacking provenance, these fragments provide significant interpretive possibility. They show the layout and ritual scenes typical of yellow-varnished coffins. White linen robes and a leopard’s-fur wrap identify the disembodied figures as priests. Hieroglyphs run along flat, abstract surfaces. They suggest the formulaic “[Osiris] ruler-of-eternity” and reference the heart, seat of intelligence, memory, and action. Painted plaster has given way to fractured wood. Originally unseen, the fragments now invite us to study construction, materiality, and socioeconomic context.media/T201775-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:45:26-07:001298-743 BCEPhysical objectObject ID T2017.7.5Archaeology; AfricaWood; paint; plaster; varnishStanford UniversityFound in collections in 2017Nineteenth through Twenty-second Dynasty; EgyptPharaonic Egyptian, New Kingdom or Third IntermediateEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:54:06-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Microblade (20095)5Microblades could be mounted with resin and string to wood and were used as arrowheads, spear points, or an array of other cutting tools. These blades were carved from large pieces of chert waste, and are frequently found in groups.media/20095-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:31:22-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20095-2Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:22:09-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Rod and Chain Links (20977)5A seemingly simple combination of a rod and chain links tells a story of appearance in ancient Egypt. Jewelry was an important component of everyday life of all classes in ancient and later Egypt. Gold and copper were typically reserved for the wealthy; however, the technology of bronze provided luxury at a fraction of the cost. We believe this bronze rod and chain was most likely a jewelry component, perhaps securing a necklace or wrist bangle, worn by a working member of later Egyptian society.media/20977-3.JPGplain2019-06-18T02:30:50-07:00332 BCE-640 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20977Archaeology; AfricaBronzeStanford UniversityGift of Timothy Hopkins to Stanford University prior to 1939Macedonian, Ptolemaic, Roman, or Byzantine; EgyptHellenistic, Roman, or Byzantine EgyptianChristina J. Hodgeb0448a0ebf7b6fff7b74ba40ef2cdd594c9bfcf9
12019-05-08T15:54:54-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Microblade (20096)5Microblades could be mounted with resin and string to wood and were used as arrowheads, spear points, or an array of other cutting tools. These blades were carved from large pieces of chert waste, and are frequently found in groups.media/20096-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:31:49-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20096-2Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:57:22-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Saw Blade (20045)5Serrated blades were cutting tools, usually mounted with resin into a wooden or bone handle. The jagged edges were made by overlapping precise circular flakes to create sharp points.media/20045-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:35:22-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20045-2Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:03:42-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Arrowhead (20144)5Stone tools are often considered strong and lasting. These arrowheads are an example of tools meant to break. The barbs on the side were very difficult to remove from flesh, often breaking off in the process.media/20144-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:25:24-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20144-2Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:58:06-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Saw Blade (20048)5Serrated blades were cutting tools, usually mounted with resin into a wooden or bone handle. The jagged edges were made by overlapping precise circular flakes to create sharp points.media/20048-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:36:33-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20048-2Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:49:55-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Blade (20190)5The final stage of production focused on refining the item’s shape, giving it features like smooth sides, sharp edges, fine points, and fingers grips. Of course, these specific modifications depended on the item’s intended use.media/20190-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:28:30-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20190Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:52:35-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Microblade (20087)5Microblades could be mounted with resin and string to wood and were used as arrowheads, spear points, or an array of other cutting tools. These blades were carved from large pieces of chert waste, and are frequently found in groups.media/20087-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:29:46-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20087-2Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:43:28-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Core (20067)5Cores—purposefully shaped nodules of stone—were used as a “blank” starting point from which toolmakers would strike off flakes with a hammer stone in order to make implements. Toolmakers could also shape the core itself into an implement.media/20067.JPGplain2019-05-21T03:06:59-07:00(ca. 5000-3000 BCE)Physical objectObject ID 20067Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic; Fayum, Faiyum Governorate, EgyptNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:53:26-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Microblade (20091)4Microblades could be mounted with resin and string to wood and were used as arrowheads, spear points, or an array of other cutting tools. These blades were carved from large pieces of chert waste, and are frequently found in groups.media/20091.JPGplain2019-06-05T09:24:14-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20091Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:56:42-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Saw Blade (20046)4Serrated blades were cutting tools, usually mounted with resin into a wooden or bone handle. The jagged edges were made by overlapping precise circular flakes to create sharp points.media/20046.JPGplain2019-06-05T09:31:25-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20046Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:00:27-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Arrowhead (20135)4Stone tools are often considered strong and lasting. These arrowheads are an example of tools meant to break. The barbs on the side were very difficult to remove from flesh, often breaking off in the process.media/20135.JPGplain2019-06-05T08:54:14-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20135Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:01:15-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Arrowhead (20138)4Stone tools are often considered strong and lasting. These arrowheads are an example of tools meant to break. The barbs on the side were very difficult to remove from flesh, often breaking off in the process.media/20138.JPGplain2019-06-05T08:55:51-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20138Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:01:57-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Arrowhead (20139)4Stone tools are often considered strong and lasting. These arrowheads are an example of tools meant to break. The barbs on the side were very difficult to remove from flesh, often breaking off in the process.media/20139.JPGplain2019-06-05T08:58:16-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20139Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:47:40-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Blade Pre-form (20225)4The next stage of production involved striking off large chunks of the flake, allowing the item to assume its general shape as a blade or point.media/20225.JPGplain2019-06-05T09:06:40-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20225Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic; DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:21:01-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Spindle (66.302)3A spindle is used to spin and twist fibers into thread. In ancient Egypt, this thread was more than likely linen, a light cloth for the hot desert. Flax fibers were extracted from harvested flax seeds. These fibers were then spun, woven, and finally sewed by women at home. Egyptian writings describe spindles as early as circa 2000 BCE; however, spindles of that era were mostly crafted in wood, suggesting this is a later example. Despite being hundreds or even thousands years old, this spindle rivals spindles still being used today.media/66302 edit.jpgplain2019-05-14T23:37:11-07:00Found in collections in 1966Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-06-24T08:15:50-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Refined Earthenware Vessel (T2018.2.4)2Although this vessel was rediscovered recently with no identification, its material qualities illuminate its life’s details. Most Egyptian ceramics have a round base, but this vessel has a footring. Since footrings start appearing in the Ptolemaic period, this detail suggests that this vessel came from this period or later. The remarkable thinness of its walls suggests that a professional threw this vessel for sale to a wealthy individual.media/T2018.2.4_2.jpgplain2019-06-24T08:16:10-07:00post ca. 305 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID T2018.2.4Archaeology; AfricaEarthenware (refined)Stanford UniversityFound in collections in 2018Ptolemaic or later; EgyptHellenistic or later EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-06-05T05:47:20-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Jar, Partial (21108)2This jar’s wavy ornamentation evokes the undulating flow of water. Early ceramicists decorated similar vessels with figural representations of animals, people, and ships to highlight the importance of the Nile River to Neolithic Egyptians. Pressing damp clay between his/her hand and a large, flat wooden paddle, the potter shaped a thin-walled vessel for the easy carrying and storing of grains, cereals, and other starches, residues of which are preserved inside.media/21108_2.jpgplain2019-06-24T06:40:54-07:00ca. 3500-3100 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID 21108Arhcaeology; AfricaEarthenware; mineral pigmentStanford UniversityDonated to Stanford by Timothy Hopkins before 1939 after acquisition through the Egypt Exploration FundNeolithic EgyptianNaqada IIEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-06-24T06:58:37-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Soul House, Fragments (21364.2)2While the rich and powerful were buried in tombs of stone, ancient Egyptians with smaller budgets buried their loved ones underneath a soul house like this one. These models represented shelter and offerings to sustain the deceased. A complete example is shown in a nearby picture. The fragments displayed here represent the deceased individual with a table and bowls of food, alongside cuts of meat. The rough fabric and cursory shaping of the clay highlight the common status of the recipient. This item was destroyed in the earthquake of 1906, but its surviving fragments are whole enough for interpretation. While the craftsman paid little attention to detail, this soul house was sturdy enough to fulfill its purposes: to survive the tests of time and provide continual offerings to the buried in the afterlife.media/21364.2 image 1.jpgplain2019-06-24T06:59:07-07:001994-1781 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID 21364.2Archaeology; AfricaEarthenware (terra cotta)Stanford UniversityCollected by Mrs. Émile Brugsch on unknown date prior to 1901; donated to Stanford ca. 1902 and before 1906 by Jane Lathrop StanfordTwelfth Dynasty; Gebelein, New Valley Governorate, EgyptPharaonic Egyptian, Middle KingdomEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-06-24T07:45:54-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Soul House, Fragments (21364.2)2While the rich and powerful were buried in tombs of stone, ancient Egyptians with smaller budgets buried their loved ones underneath a soul house like this one. These models represented shelter and offerings to sustain the deceased. A complete example is shown in a nearby picture. The fragments displayed here represent the deceased individual with a table and bowls of food, alongside cuts of meat. The rough fabric and cursory shaping of the clay highlight the common status of the recipient. This item was destroyed in the earthquake of 1906, but its surviving fragments are whole enough for interpretation. While the craftsman paid little attention to detail, this soul house was sturdy enough to fulfill its purposes: to survive the tests of time and provide continual offerings to the buried in the afterlife.media/21364.2image2 (1) (1).jpgplain2019-06-24T07:46:17-07:001994-1781 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID 21364.2Archaeology; AfricaEarthenware (terra cotta)Stanford UniversityCollected by Mrs. Émile Brugsch on unknown date prior to 1901; donated to Stanford ca. 1902 and before 1906 by Jane Lathrop StanfordTwelfth Dynasty; Gebelein, New Valley Governorate, EgyptPharaonic Egyptian, Middle KingdomEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
This page has paths:
12019-04-16T19:40:24-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12ThemesChristina J. Hodge36plain8761692019-06-14T22:04:08-07:00Christina J. Hodgeb0448a0ebf7b6fff7b74ba40ef2cdd594c9bfcf9