12019-04-16T19:38:15-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e123323016plain2019-09-10T18:23:10-07:00Christina J. Hodgeb0448a0ebf7b6fff7b74ba40ef2cdd594c9bfcf9
Student curators came to believe that imagining the past may be easier when we are not dazzled by the precious materials or rare significances that often dominate representations of ancient Egypt. Instead, we are invited to find common connections between past and present by objects of everyday life.
Some items and their roles are utterly familiar, like tweezers and locks. Some are strangely analogous, like stone arrowheads or devotional figurines. Some, such as miniature ceramic food offerings and gilded death masks, realize fundamental distinctions between ancient worlds and our own. In creating this exhibit, curators—sometimes literally—looked into a mirror of the past, to see vanity, aspiration, and, most of all, themselves reflected in their interpretations.
Contents of this annotation:
12019-05-13T18:02:10-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Soul House, Fragments (21364.3)13While the rich and powerful were buried in tombs of stone, ancient Egyptians with smaller budgets buried their loved ones underneath a soul house like this one. These models represented shelter and offerings to sustain the deceased. A complete example is shown in a nearby picture. The fragments displayed here represent the deceased individual with a table and bowls of food, alongside cuts of meat. The rough fabric and cursory shaping of the clay highlight the common status of the recipient. This item was destroyed in the earthquake of 1906, but its surviving fragments are whole enough for interpretation. While the craftsman paid little attention to detail, this soul house was sturdy enough to fulfill its purposes: to survive the tests of time and provide continual offerings to the buried in the afterlife.media/soul house fragments 213642.pngplain2019-06-24T07:28:08-07:001994-1781 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 21364.3Archaeology; AfricaEarthenware (terra cotta)Stanford UniversityCollected by Mrs. Émile Brugsch on unknown date prior to 1901; donated to Stanford ca. 1902 and before 1906 by Jane Lathrop StanfordTwelfth Dynasty; Gebelein, New Valley Governorate, EgyptPharaonic Egyptian, Middle KingdomEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-04-17T02:34:24-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Spouted Vessel, Partial (21103)8This object is remarkable not for its trivial purpose or simple construction but for the careful efforts put into its conservation. The hole on its upper body marks a loss. It was originally a “spouted vessel” used to hold and pour liquid. When whole, it resembled the complete Pre-dynastic vessel (ca. 3500 BCE) shown in the accompanying image. Despite missing parts, inexpert mends, scratches, and damage, considerable effort was put into this vessel’s restoration in the early twentieth century when conservation practices weren’t as advanced as they are now. This determination highlights the importance of the vessel to the collector. We find value in the effort that went into making this common, simple vessel whole again.media/21103 in ex.jpgplain2019-06-05T10:12:50-07:005000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 21103Archaeology; AfricaEarthenwareStanford UniversityExcavated by William M. Flinders Petrie during an Egypt Exploration Fund project in 1894–1895; acquired by Timothy Hopkins, who donated the work to Stanford prior to 1939Pre-dynastic; EgyptNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:02:52-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Arrowhead (20141)7Stone tools are often considered strong and lasting. These arrowheads are an example of tools meant to break. The barbs on the side were very difficult to remove from flesh, often breaking off in the process.media/20141.JPGplain2019-06-05T18:41:05-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20141Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heywood Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:08:08-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Crocodile Figurine, Partial (20824)7This figurine is the Egyptian crocodile god Suchus (a.k.a. Sobek) missing his snout. The picture of a complete version from the same site is shown nearby. As it is an object meant for worship, it may seem odd that the object is so roughly constructed. For instance, when looking at the top of the object, one can clearly see the join between the figurine’s two molded sides. This careless construction elucidates that this object was intended for commoners. Such figurines were mass-produced for worshipers of Suchus to put on their altars at home.media/20824 in ex-min.jpgplain2019-06-05T18:58:51-07:00337-361 CEPhysical objectObject ID 20824Archaeology; AfricaEarthenware (terra cotta)Stanford UniversityExcavated by William M. Flinders Petrie on behalf of the Egypt Exploration Fund in 1903–1904; donated to Stanford by Timothy Hopkins in 1905Roman, around the reign of Constantius II; Ehnasya (a.k.a. Heracleopolis Magna), Beni Suef Governorate, EgyptRoman EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-04-17T02:38:32-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Mirror (21482)6Pharaonic Egyptians were quite self-aware and conscious of their appearance, making mirrors a commonplace item among the elite in both life and death. Mirror handles varied in material and decoration. Men favored fewer embellishments than women. A close look at this mirror reveals a crosshatch pattern indented in its surface, evidence of its fabrication through hammering. Although no longer reflective, its common form creates a seamless connection between ancient Egyptian culture and contemporary society.media/21482-2.jpgplain2019-06-22T10:44:18-07:002160–1994 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 21482Archaeology; AfricaIron; SilverStanford UniversityGift of Jane Lathrop Stanford prior to 1905Eleventh Dynasty; EgyptPharaonic Egyptian, First Intermediate through Middle KingdomEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:16:38-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Tweezers (20966)5Tweezers were commonplace in ancient Egypt and often used in conjunction with mirrors. Early tweezers like these were used by individuals to pluck hairs—much like in our own society. Egyptologists also believe that certain tweezers were used as tongs to hold pots over ovens. The difference in function came down to size; larger tweezers were necessary for cooking, while smaller tweezers, such as these, were meant for one’s body.media/20966-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:47:04-07:00332 BCE–640 CEPhysical objectObject ID 20966Archaeology; AfricaBronzeStanford UniversityExcavated by Bernard G. Grenfell Arthur S. Hunt between 1893 and 1894, acquired by Timothy Hopkins from the Egyptian Exploration Fund in 1909 and donated to StanfordMacedonian, Ptolemaic, Roman, or Byzantine (332 BCE–640 CE); Oxyrhynchus, Al Minya Governorate, EgyptHellenistic, Roman, or Byzantine EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:54:06-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Microblade (20095)5Microblades could be mounted with resin and string to wood and were used as arrowheads, spear points, or an array of other cutting tools. These blades were carved from large pieces of chert waste, and are frequently found in groups.media/20095-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:31:22-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20095-2Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:54:54-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Microblade (20096)5Microblades could be mounted with resin and string to wood and were used as arrowheads, spear points, or an array of other cutting tools. These blades were carved from large pieces of chert waste, and are frequently found in groups.media/20096-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:31:49-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20096-2Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:57:22-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Saw Blade (20045)5Serrated blades were cutting tools, usually mounted with resin into a wooden or bone handle. The jagged edges were made by overlapping precise circular flakes to create sharp points.media/20045-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:35:22-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20045-2Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:22:09-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Rod and Chain Links (20977)5A seemingly simple combination of a rod and chain links tells a story of appearance in ancient Egypt. Jewelry was an important component of everyday life of all classes in ancient and later Egypt. Gold and copper were typically reserved for the wealthy; however, the technology of bronze provided luxury at a fraction of the cost. We believe this bronze rod and chain was most likely a jewelry component, perhaps securing a necklace or wrist bangle, worn by a working member of later Egyptian society.media/20977-3.JPGplain2019-06-18T02:30:50-07:00332 BCE-640 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20977Archaeology; AfricaBronzeStanford UniversityGift of Timothy Hopkins to Stanford University prior to 1939Macedonian, Ptolemaic, Roman, or Byzantine; EgyptHellenistic, Roman, or Byzantine EgyptianChristina J. Hodgeb0448a0ebf7b6fff7b74ba40ef2cdd594c9bfcf9
12019-05-08T15:58:06-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Saw Blade (20048)5Serrated blades were cutting tools, usually mounted with resin into a wooden or bone handle. The jagged edges were made by overlapping precise circular flakes to create sharp points.media/20048-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:36:33-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20048-2Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:03:42-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Arrowhead (20144)5Stone tools are often considered strong and lasting. These arrowheads are an example of tools meant to break. The barbs on the side were very difficult to remove from flesh, often breaking off in the process.media/20144-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:25:24-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20144-2Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:17:50-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Hairpin, Fragment (20595)5Used in tandem with a mirror, this decorative hairpin offers yet another material connection between ancient personal practices and those of contemporary society. A luxury item, hairpins were used by wealthy Roman Egyptian women to maintain their elaborate hairstyles. Although many hairpins were straight, some, like this one, were crescent-shaped. Of a type known as an orbis, this piece was meant to be seen, simultaneously showing an Egyptian aesthetic and acting as a status symbol.media/20595-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:42:42-07:00332 BCE-641 CEPhysical objectObject ID 20595Archaeology; AfricaBronzeStanford UniversityExcavated by the Egypt Exploration Fund in 1906–1907, acquired by Timothy Hopkins from Fund and donated to Stanford in 1911RomanRoman EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:43:28-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Core (20067)5Cores—purposefully shaped nodules of stone—were used as a “blank” starting point from which toolmakers would strike off flakes with a hammer stone in order to make implements. Toolmakers could also shape the core itself into an implement.media/20067.JPGplain2019-05-21T03:06:59-07:00(ca. 5000-3000 BCE)Physical objectObject ID 20067Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic; Fayum, Faiyum Governorate, EgyptNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:49:55-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Blade (20190)5The final stage of production focused on refining the item’s shape, giving it features like smooth sides, sharp edges, fine points, and fingers grips. Of course, these specific modifications depended on the item’s intended use.media/20190-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:28:30-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20190Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:52:35-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Microblade (20087)5Microblades could be mounted with resin and string to wood and were used as arrowheads, spear points, or an array of other cutting tools. These blades were carved from large pieces of chert waste, and are frequently found in groups.media/20087-2.JPGplain2019-06-22T10:29:46-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20087-2Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:01:15-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Arrowhead (20138)4Stone tools are often considered strong and lasting. These arrowheads are an example of tools meant to break. The barbs on the side were very difficult to remove from flesh, often breaking off in the process.media/20138.JPGplain2019-06-05T08:55:51-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20138Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:01:57-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Arrowhead (20139)4Stone tools are often considered strong and lasting. These arrowheads are an example of tools meant to break. The barbs on the side were very difficult to remove from flesh, often breaking off in the process.media/20139.JPGplain2019-06-05T08:58:16-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20139Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:47:40-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Blade Pre-form (20225)4The next stage of production involved striking off large chunks of the flake, allowing the item to assume its general shape as a blade or point.media/20225.JPGplain2019-06-05T09:06:40-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20225Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic; DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:53:26-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Microblade (20091)4Microblades could be mounted with resin and string to wood and were used as arrowheads, spear points, or an array of other cutting tools. These blades were carved from large pieces of chert waste, and are frequently found in groups.media/20091.JPGplain2019-06-05T09:24:14-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20091Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T15:56:42-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Chert Saw Blade (20046)4Serrated blades were cutting tools, usually mounted with resin into a wooden or bone handle. The jagged edges were made by overlapping precise circular flakes to create sharp points.media/20046.JPGplain2019-06-05T09:31:25-07:00ca. 5000-332 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20046Archaeology; AfricaChertStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynastic or DynasticNeolithic or Pharaonic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:19:19-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Pin Lock Component (14082)4Perhaps taking inspiration from Mesopotamian technology, ancient Egyptians crafted this decorated item to keep valuables secure in life and death. It entered the collection with fragments of jewelry, so we assume this lock once kept jewelry protected from thieves or tomb robbers. Adornments were so commonplace in ancient Egypt, jewelry was a “luxury” that became almost a necessity. Thus, many people needed a place to keep it safe. This piece draws further parallels between contemporary and ancient experiences. Just as we have special places to put valuables, so too did ancient Egyptians.media/14082.JPGplain2019-06-05T09:55:09-07:00ca. 3050 BCE-640 CEPhysical objectObject ID 14082Archaeology; AfricaBronzeStanford UniversityLikely acquired by Timothy Hopkins from the Egyptian Exploration Fund and donated it to Stanford before 1939Dynastic, Macedonian, Ptolemaic, Roman, or Byzantine; EgyptPharaonic, Hellenistic, Roman, or Byzantine EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:00:27-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Arrowhead (20135)4Stone tools are often considered strong and lasting. These arrowheads are an example of tools meant to break. The barbs on the side were very difficult to remove from flesh, often breaking off in the process.media/20135.JPGplain2019-06-05T08:54:14-07:00ca. 5000-3000 BCEPhysical objectObject ID 20135Archaeology; AfricaStoneStanford UniversityExcavated by Heyward Walter Seton-Karr and donated to Stanford ca. 1908Pre-dynasticNeolithic EgyptianEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-05-08T16:21:01-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Spindle (66.302)3A spindle is used to spin and twist fibers into thread. In ancient Egypt, this thread was more than likely linen, a light cloth for the hot desert. Flax fibers were extracted from harvested flax seeds. These fibers were then spun, woven, and finally sewed by women at home. Egyptian writings describe spindles as early as circa 2000 BCE; however, spindles of that era were mostly crafted in wood, suggesting this is a later example. Despite being hundreds or even thousands years old, this spindle rivals spindles still being used today.media/66302 edit.jpgplain2019-05-14T23:37:11-07:00Found in collections in 1966Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-06-05T05:47:20-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Jar, Partial (21108)2This jar’s wavy ornamentation evokes the undulating flow of water. Early ceramicists decorated similar vessels with figural representations of animals, people, and ships to highlight the importance of the Nile River to Neolithic Egyptians. Pressing damp clay between his/her hand and a large, flat wooden paddle, the potter shaped a thin-walled vessel for the easy carrying and storing of grains, cereals, and other starches, residues of which are preserved inside.media/21108_2.jpgplain2019-06-24T06:40:54-07:00ca. 3500-3100 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID 21108Arhcaeology; AfricaEarthenware; mineral pigmentStanford UniversityDonated to Stanford by Timothy Hopkins before 1939 after acquisition through the Egypt Exploration FundNeolithic EgyptianNaqada IIEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-06-24T06:58:37-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Soul House, Fragments (21364.2)2While the rich and powerful were buried in tombs of stone, ancient Egyptians with smaller budgets buried their loved ones underneath a soul house like this one. These models represented shelter and offerings to sustain the deceased. A complete example is shown in a nearby picture. The fragments displayed here represent the deceased individual with a table and bowls of food, alongside cuts of meat. The rough fabric and cursory shaping of the clay highlight the common status of the recipient. This item was destroyed in the earthquake of 1906, but its surviving fragments are whole enough for interpretation. While the craftsman paid little attention to detail, this soul house was sturdy enough to fulfill its purposes: to survive the tests of time and provide continual offerings to the buried in the afterlife.media/21364.2 image 1.jpgplain2019-06-24T06:59:07-07:001994-1781 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID 21364.2Archaeology; AfricaEarthenware (terra cotta)Stanford UniversityCollected by Mrs. Émile Brugsch on unknown date prior to 1901; donated to Stanford ca. 1902 and before 1906 by Jane Lathrop StanfordTwelfth Dynasty; Gebelein, New Valley Governorate, EgyptPharaonic Egyptian, Middle KingdomEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
12019-06-24T07:45:54-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12Soul House, Fragments (21364.2)2While the rich and powerful were buried in tombs of stone, ancient Egyptians with smaller budgets buried their loved ones underneath a soul house like this one. These models represented shelter and offerings to sustain the deceased. A complete example is shown in a nearby picture. The fragments displayed here represent the deceased individual with a table and bowls of food, alongside cuts of meat. The rough fabric and cursory shaping of the clay highlight the common status of the recipient. This item was destroyed in the earthquake of 1906, but its surviving fragments are whole enough for interpretation. While the craftsman paid little attention to detail, this soul house was sturdy enough to fulfill its purposes: to survive the tests of time and provide continual offerings to the buried in the afterlife.media/21364.2image2 (1) (1).jpgplain2019-06-24T07:46:17-07:001994-1781 BCEPhysical ObjectObject ID 21364.2Archaeology; AfricaEarthenware (terra cotta)Stanford UniversityCollected by Mrs. Émile Brugsch on unknown date prior to 1901; donated to Stanford ca. 1902 and before 1906 by Jane Lathrop StanfordTwelfth Dynasty; Gebelein, New Valley Governorate, EgyptPharaonic Egyptian, Middle KingdomEmilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12
This page has paths:
12019-04-16T19:40:24-07:00Emilia Porubcin63ec028064958b3240cc8e4e010f355faa0c8e12ThemesChristina J. Hodge36plain8761692019-06-14T22:04:08-07:00Christina J. Hodgeb0448a0ebf7b6fff7b74ba40ef2cdd594c9bfcf9