US Latinx Activism and Protests: From the Farm to the (Legislative) Table

Roosevelt High School Walkouts

      As thousands of students staged a walkout at five high schools across East L.A. to demand better educational opportunities, the firing of racist faculty, and a more inclusive curriculum, among others, the entire nation watched. Among these five schools were Wilson, Garfield, Lincoln, Belmont, and finally Roosevelt High School, the primary focus of this page. These high schools served an area with a predominantly Chicanx population and also had high dropout rates compared to national averages. With large classroom sizes and poorly funded facilities, Chicanx students were placed in a system that granted them little opportunity for higher education. Many of these same frustrations were shared at Camp Hess Kramer, a Jewish camp that held leadership programs for Chicanx students of East L.A. schools, and many of these students would practice social activism and create the foundation for the demonstrations that occurred in 1968 (Sahagún). One of these participants was Sal Castro, a teacher who worked at Lincoln High School. Castro was an instrumental figure in the demonstration, as he helped students first take their concerns to the school board, and then when those were ignored, helped organize a walkout (Mejía-Rentas).
       The walkouts at Roosevelt occurred on March 6, 1968, however they were preceded by other walkouts at Wilson and Garfield High Schools just days before (Mejía-Rentas). This provided the school’s administrations some time to prepare, restricting students’ access to the outside and calling the police. Members of the Brown Beret, a prominent militant Chicanx group, came to defend students against police intimidation. Overall, the walkout demonstrations endured for several days, despite significant resistance from police and school administration. The Los Angeles Board of Education met with community members and students in the days following the demonstration, and refused all of their requests, citing that there was no room in the budget (Mejía-Rentas). While no immediate changes were made to the structure of the school system, many have maintained that this event was largely significant in the fight for Mexican American liberties in the country. It represented the determination and willingness on the part of Chicanx activists to directly clash with authorities to fight for what they believed in. It was also a demonstration of the power that the community held, mobilizing thousands in just a few short days.
       In reviewing images from the 1968 demonstration at Roosevelt High School, what stuck out to me the most were protestors’ signs, most especially those that portrayed messages of solidarity. While many of them feature criticisms of the school district and educational demands, there were also a striking number of them that referenced other fights in the Chicanx political movement. Written on many of the signs was the phrase, ‘Boycott Grapes’ or ‘Boycott Lettuce’. These phrases come from the fight to establish protections and rights for farm workers, a movement pushed forth by Chicano activists such as Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta. Additionally, signs reference demands related to the corrupt justice system and police brutality. As discussed in the other sections of this piece, police brutality is an enduring issue against minority groups. Excessive use of force is a recurring pattern that highlights the inequality ingrained within the system. In one sign, a student comments on the school to prison pipeline. This has to do with the lack of opportunities afforded to Chicano students both within and after high school. Within high school, drop out rights for Chicanx students were around 50%. This limited opportunities for higher education along with teachers and administrators who did not properly support Chicanx students either. Excessive policing and this lack of access added to the school to prison pipeline, also a topic covered by protestors' signs.  In the absence of opportunities for higher education, young Chicano men were less likely to be able to avoid the draft in the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War was a significant source of mobilization during this era. This led to higher rates of induction to the armed forces and thus the number of resulting deaths from the war for Chicano-Americans was also drastically higher than national average. Protest signs referencing the Vietnam War can also be seen. 
      The content of the protest signs analyzed in this exploration is indicative of the nature of solidarity within the Chicano liberation movement during the sixties and beyond. An analysis of the signs reveals the multiple layers and various demands that extend beyond just reform in the school districts. This suggests a deep understanding of the relationships between all of these systems of oppression; involving the farm workers movement, police brutality, the military industry. 

Works Cited
Mejías-Rentas, Antonio. “How 1968 East L.A. Student Walkouts Ignited the Chicano Movement.” History.Com, www.history.com/news/east-los-angeles-chicano-student-walkouts-1968. Accessed 30 May 2023.

Sahagún, Louis. “East L.A., 1968: ‘walkout!’ the Day High School Students Helped Ignite the Chicano Power Movement.” Los Angeles Times, 1 Mar. 2018, www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-1968-east-la-walkouts-20180301 htmlstory.html#:~:text=It%20was%20just%20past%20noon%20on%20a%20sunny,teachers%20who%20were%20poorly%20trained%2C%20indifferent%20or%20racist.

This page has paths:

This page references: