The Bestselling Novel: Currents in American History and Culture

Much Ado About La Rue

Sweet

charlotte
WHOSE FAULT WAS IT?
(scroll down)

 
Picture this: An innocent school girl, with the perfect upbringing and perfect parents.

Now picture this: A frail, lucid girl with a child in her arms, dying in front of her beloved father in a wretched, dirty room.

What could have gone wrong here?

This was the story of Charlotte Temple, a tall, elegant girl of fifteen who is daughter to Henry and Lucy Temple, a couple joined by virtuous traits and pure love. Being a very young girl, the best way to describe her is naive and easily influenced. She is well-meaning, but indecisive and unable to make own choices.

Still, Charlotte also greatly fears disappointing her parents, but at the same time does not want to sadden her friend, La Rue, nor her seducer, Montraville.


However, due to her extremely passive nature, not only does Charlotte break her parents' hearts for her actions, but she also unfortunately falls victim to a man's seduction and a friend's bad advice, and ends up cast away as a mistress and then an adulterer.

It also results in her evoking pity from all those around her, further making her insecure and even more dependent. 


And finally, after being discarded by yet another man, Charlotte dies in the arms of her father, full of regret and sorrow. Not only is she unable to raise her own child, but she departs her loving parents and puts them in misery.

So, is Charlotte's naivety the sole blame for her sad demise?

Perhaps there was one more person who could have also been a a reason for this mess.

Madmoiselle La Rue, could it be you?
 
 

















 
SO, DO WE

blame la rue?
MADEMOISELLE LA RUE
(scroll down)
 
Perhaps one the biggest ironies in the story is how Charlotte was enrolled in a school that was meant to teach girls the "proper" values, yet had a character like La Rue as one of the instructors.

Charlotte's young and attractive French teacher, Mademoiselle La Rue had a "colorful" past that made her into the person she was today. Not only has she previously eloped with a young officer in England, the novel implies she has also associated with other men.

La Rue proceeds to deceive Charlotte into meeting with her seducer out of boredom, and taunts her several times for being a “
foolish little prude,” which encourages Charlotte to act outside of her comfort zone even more (23). 

La Rue's encouragement serves as a "negative influence" on Charlotte, and the younger girl is unfortunately naïve enough to fall for her words.

La Rue is also undeniably one of the major catalysts of Charlotte’s downfall. Rowson describes her as someone who was "not the kind of people whose conversation and morals were exactly such as parents of delicacy and refinement would wish a daughter to copy" (20).

It is evident from this that Rowson completely disagrees with La Rue's behavior and condemns her character, thus using her as one of the main reasons of Charlotte's doom.

La Rue serves two purposes in the story: 
1- The person you should never be.
2- The person you should never befriend.  

Rowson utilizes La Rue's character to illustrate how being friends with the wrong person (who is opposite from virtuous and pure), can lead to you falling in the same path as her, if not worse.  


 
 
 
 


 






 
  
 

      "Now pray don't think I meant take Eve's part.
      No, she'd no right, 'twas acting very wrong.
      To Listen to the Serpents flattering tongue;
      And from her error, her descendant's claim"

                                     (Rowson, "Rights of Woman" 138)

In her poem "Rights of Woman," Rowson brings up how similar to men, women should be granted rights too. She talks about how these rights would be able to protect women from their "insidious flatterers" as well as grant other rights that allow them to act freely (26). 

She alludes to the Creation story in order to properly illustrate how women, who were usually ones blamed for their misdeeds, should not be the only ones who have to bear the blame of their misfortunes. 

The first stanza addresses how women like Eve, who failed to obey God in the the Garden of Eden, are solely blamed for their misdeeds. She argues, however, that it isn't completely their fault. Women like Charlotte are prone to being enticed to commit wrongdoings when they listen to "the serpents flattering tongue," suggesting that they are weak to other people's influences and words (20). Although in this case Rowson may be referring to the words of the seducers, this is also fitting for La Rue because she was undeniably the main reason why Charlotte was tempted to "stray from the right path."

This move may be problematic, however, due to the fact that it suggests that it may be difficult to confide in anyone but one's parent. It might, in a way, be suggesting that all female friendships are only set women up to be against one another. 

Society can also be blamed due to the fact that it drove La Rue to act the carefree and rebellious way she does. Perhaps the same unrealistic expectations it had of her also made her victim to its idealized and narrow idea of what a woman should act like and be, which drove her to go against all of it, and invite other women to do the same as well.



   

 

 

 


Sources:
- Rowson, Susanna "Rights of Woman" in 
Charlotte Temple. 1794. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2011.

Images used:
- https://i.pinimg.com/originals/11/57/c7/1157c7ff7afecffd725d32fc94f3332a.jpg
- https://i.pinimg.com/736x/21/be/05/21be05f916891a0ae28f52cca43b71cf--edwardian-hairstyles-vintage-hairstyles.jpg

This page has paths: