Second-Hand Pleasure: Bettie Page's Bondage Films
While Lorde’s claim that eroticism cannot be felt second-hand, and the Dworkin-Mackinnon ideology claim that women inherently cannot consent to pose explicitly would label Bettie Page’s work in Klaw’s Bondage films as degrading abuse, Page’s performance of bondage and masochism exposes a sexuality that challenges the policing of women’s sexual and erotic potential. Similarly, Nadine Strossin articulates that the “subversive quality of “pornography” challenges the entire status quo, including social structures that inhibit women’s freedom” (Strossin 1133). Bettie Page’s bondage films portray women, including herself, wearing highly sexualized outfits, (leather and lacey undergarments, high heels, and stockings). They tie each other up, spank each other, trap each other, roll around and fight on the floor. These violent yet sexual acts performed for the camera may appear to be degrading to some. But as Strossin explains, what “one woman views as misogynistic may be viewed by another as reaffirming her desires and her equality” (1130). Denying Page’s pleasure in her bondage performance, and denying that women could be empowered by this portrayal of dominance and sexuality, limits the extent of women’s desires. The sexual dominance that Page’s performance exhibits broadens the scope of female sexuality to the public eye.
Works Cited:
Bettie Page Reveals All. Dir. Mark Mori. Writ. Douglass Miller. Single Spark Pictures. 2012. Film.
Lorde, Audre. “Uses of the Erotic: The Erotic as Power.” Sister Outsider. Freedom, CA: The Crossing Press, 2007. 53-59. Print.
Strossen, Nadine. “A Feminist Critique of "the" Feminist Critique of Pornography.” Virginia Law Review 79.5 (1993): 1099–1190. Web. 21 October 2015.