Sign in or register
for additional privileges

MACHINE DREAMS

Alexei Taylor, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Hypothesis

The source of fascination for the automata is different for their spectators and their creators. The spectators of the automatons, they would feel the awe of the impossible and magic-like creation. Here, people start questioning what makes a human “human”, seeing a non-biological creation depicting a daily activity so delicately. While at the same time the conflicting feeling of fear would rest in the air. The knowledge that the automata would not age the way that the spectators do alienates the machines from them. The automata’s immortality is contrasted with the mortality of the spectators.

The making of an automaton requires a vast amount of time and handwork. The consequence of this long and arduous task is a mimesis of human being. For some makers, building a self-acting machine is like paying a tribute to the one that will resemble the machine. Creating a lifelike representation of the dead loved ones will “resurrect” them from their graves and embody the properties that their human counterparts once had. This can also give the maker the sensation of “playing god”, and the more taboo it seems, the stronger the sense of powerfulness. Attempts to create an automaton that could bleed and covering an automaton with an actual human skin are cases makes it seem that they were trying to make an ideal version of themselves; the immortal human.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Hypothesis"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Final essay - Proposal, page 2 of 4 Next page on path

Related:  The WriterPresence footprintsthe WriterBibliographyJaquet-Droz automatonsThe first encounterSources of fascination (4) - Mechanization of menResourcesthe Writer - insideSimulacraThe UncannySpectatorThe ideas and values behindGregory Barsamian - Feral FontThe technology behindAuraHugo and the cityDevelopment story of the Angry BirdsMatrix - The pillThe Bird's social purposePersistence of visionAutomatons and its sources of fascinationThe Human Touch: Towards a Historical Anthropology and Dream Analysis of Self-acting InstrumentsPresenceSources of fascination (1) - Playing godWhat makes an observer modern; Jiwon ShinGregory Barsamian - RunnerTechnology used in automataConclusionJaquet-Droz automataAura handwrittenFrans Zwartjes "Spectator" (1970)Final essay backgroundAngry birds shirt tagsAngry Birds as a social toolThe Matrix PosterQuestionsBibliographythe WriterHugo magic trickJaquet-Droz - "The Writer"Hugo turns into an automatonHybridjiwonSources of fascination (3) - Threat of automatonsPhenakistoscope Phenakistiscope Optical Toy FantascopeNanook of the North, Robert FLAHERTY, 1921HugoAlteritybackground for ethnographySources of fascination (2) - Representations of memoryEpistemologyAngry BirdsSymbolicFinal essay - ProposalAre Humanzees Possible?Bershka and its connection to Angry BirdsToothed wheelsMaintaining the WriterEdison's Eve: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical LifeAutomata and Mimesis on the Stage of Theatre HistoryThe digesting duck