Sign in or register
for additional privileges

MACHINE DREAMS

Alexei Taylor, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

What makes an observer modern; Jiwon Shin

The modern concept of an observer is quite distinct to that of the eighteenth century. During the eighteenth century, the camera obscura had become the key representation of how an observer perceives an image in front of them, as the functions of the camera obscura was thought to have closely replicated the workings of the human eye. However, this greatly changed with the advancement of human discovery of the workings of the human body. First, with Goethe's closing of the aperture of the camera obscura, the idea that perception was inseparable from the workings of the mind and experiences of the observer. As Schopenhauer says that the resulting image that we see through our eye is "the consciousness of a picture or image at that very spot"(as quoted by Crary, 77), the objectivity is lost when a human observer perceives and processes the image in their brain to interpret what they are perceiving.
The definition of an observer changes further with the discovery of the distinction between the voluntary "cerebral" activities and involuntary "excito-motor" activities of the human body by the British physician Marshall Hall (Crary, 82). From this discovery, it was made possible for the modernist thinkers to think of the ideal 'objective' perception. Based on the discovery that there are two types in which the human body can react to the external impulses, the objective perception could be plausible. Thus, idealistically, a modern observer can perceive objectively as their perception can be controlled and tamed for them to eradicate the workings of their mind.
Another scientific breakthrough that completely moved the concept of an observer away from the workings of the camera obscura was Muller's theory the possibility of how an observer can be stimulated to see "light" regardless of whether or not there was an actual external source of light (Crary, 90). This eradicates the distinction between the interior and exterior of the camera obscura. Thus a modern observer has no distinction between what they see as a product of an impulse of the involuntary activity and what the mind fabricates for the observer to see through what is in front of them. Thus, taking it a step further, for a modern observer, human perception os subjective and thus creates distinct knowledge of the viewed subject.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "What makes an observer modern; Jiwon Shin"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path What Makes An Observer Modern?, page 9 of 10 Next page on path

Related:  Jaquet-Droz automataThe WriterJaquet-Droz - "The Writer"The Bird's social purposeAlterityThe digesting duckThe first encounterQuestionsPhenakistoscope Phenakistiscope Optical Toy FantascopeGregory Barsamian - RunnerDevelopment story of the Angry BirdsBershka and its connection to Angry BirdsEpistemologyHugo and the cityAutomatons and its sources of fascinationAura handwrittenHybridPresenceNanook of the North, Robert FLAHERTY, 1921HugoJaquet-Droz automatonsGregory Barsamian - Feral FontAuraBibliographyAutomata and Mimesis on the Stage of Theatre HistoryjiwonSpectatorbackground for ethnographyHugo turns into an automatonThe ideas and values behindAre Humanzees Possible?the WriterSimulacraResourcesConclusionThe Human Touch: Towards a Historical Anthropology and Dream Analysis of Self-acting InstrumentsThe Matrix PosterEdison's Eve: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical LifeSources of fascination (4) - Mechanization of menHugo magic trickToothed wheelsSources of fascination (3) - Threat of automatonsFinal essay backgroundthe Writer - insideAngry BirdsTechnology used in automataFinal essay - ProposalPresence footprintsHypothesisAngry Birds as a social toolThe UncannySymbolicSources of fascination (1) - Playing godPersistence of visionThe technology behindMatrix - The pillAngry birds shirt tagsSources of fascination (2) - Representations of memoryFrans Zwartjes "Spectator" (1970)Bibliographythe WriterMaintaining the Writer