Sign in or register
for additional privileges

MACHINE DREAMS

Alexei Taylor, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Conclusion


At one point, Hugo has a nightmare of him turning into an automaton. As it can clearly be seen on the photo, Hugo is not embracing the occurrence, but quite the opposite. Why, after having taken comfort in becoming a mechanical part of the clock tower and expressing the ideals in being a machine, is he afraid to become one? 

The answer lies in the feeling of the uncanny. Whether it is viewed from the perspective of the creator or the spectator of the mechanical creation, each and all sources of their fascination roots from the uncanniness of automatons. The sources of fascination of automatons described in this essay are thus categorizations of people’s reactions towards the feeling of the uncanny when encountered with their mechanical simulacrum. But this necessitates the automatons to resemble the appearance of a human being. Freud discusses the fact that the feeling of uncanny is also experienced when a person encounters a patient of mental illness in his essay The Uncanny. This is because we are able to see the resemblance between ourselves and the patient but are conflicted with the incomprehensible actions of our mimesis. It is the same case with the automatons: we succeed in associating them in terms of physical appearance, but are met with challenges of understanding that such lifelike creature can be made in the hands of man or comprehending that what allows the automaton to “live” is a set of gears. 

When the day that automatons pass the Turing test and thus becoming indistinguishable from humans, meaning that the feeling of the uncanny will become eradicated, what will it mean to be a “human”? Will it reduce to mean a being that has a finite life? Right now, these questions seem like a blurb of a science fiction novel and may seem far-fetched to take seriously, but with the continuing interest in the automatons, it may not be so far from now that we begin to attempt to answer these questions.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Conclusion"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Automatons and its sources of fascination, page 8 of 9 Next page on path

Related:  The ideas and values behindThe first encounterThe technology behindThe UncannyPersistence of visionSources of fascination (4) - Mechanization of menMaintaining the WriterjiwonGregory Barsamian - RunnerThe Bird's social purposeMatrix - The pillAngry Birds as a social toolSources of fascination (2) - Representations of memoryAlterityGregory Barsamian - Feral FontThe Matrix PosterPresenceAre Humanzees Possible?Development story of the Angry BirdsToothed wheelsJaquet-Droz - "The Writer"the WriterSpectatorAutomata and Mimesis on the Stage of Theatre HistoryTechnology used in automataSources of fascination (1) - Playing godFrans Zwartjes "Spectator" (1970)background for ethnographyAuraHybridHugoThe digesting duckAngry BirdsWhat makes an observer modern; Jiwon ShinQuestionsEdison's Eve: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical LifeAura handwrittenThe WriterNanook of the North, Robert FLAHERTY, 1921ResourcesSymbolicEpistemologySimulacraPresence footprintsthe WriterBershka and its connection to Angry BirdsHugo turns into an automatonthe Writer - insideSources of fascination (3) - Threat of automatonsHypothesisBibliographyHugo and the cityBibliographyAutomatons and its sources of fascinationFinal essay - ProposalAngry birds shirt tagsFinal essay backgroundHugo magic trickJaquet-Droz automataThe Human Touch: Towards a Historical Anthropology and Dream Analysis of Self-acting InstrumentsJaquet-Droz automatonsPhenakistoscope Phenakistiscope Optical Toy Fantascope