This site requires Javascript to be turned on. Please enable Javascript and reload the page.

Sexual Assault Prevention at the University of Michigan Main Menu SAPAC Posters Pedagogical Materials Student Athlete Surveys Survey Responses Following SAPAC Workshops SAPAC/Athletic Collection Collaboration Training Outline for "Violence Against Women" Volunteer Training Manuals Volunteer Training Manuals About Background Information and Scope Resources SAPAC Contact Information

SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Men's Tennis

24337 This document is a compilation of responses from the men’s tennis team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in yellow and blue. The yellow highlighting stands for “positive” and blue stands for “negative” as explained by the key on the first page.

This page has tags:

Student Surveys — Male Response Gianna May Sanchez
Contents of this tag:
1. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: UM Football Team This document is a compilation of responses from UM’s football team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in blue and yellow. Blue stands for “negative” and yellow stands for “positive” as explained by the key on the first page.
2. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Men's Gymnastics This document is a compilation of responses from the men’s gymnastics team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in blue and yellow. Blue stands for “negative” and yellow stands for “positive” as explained by the key on the first page.
3. Men's Track and Cross-Country This document is a compilation of responses from the men’s track and cross-country team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in yellow and blue. The yellow highlighting stands for “positive” and blue stands for “negative” as explained by the key on the first page.
4. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Men's Tennis This document is a compilation of responses from the men’s tennis team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in yellow and blue. The yellow highlighting stands for “positive” and blue stands for “negative” as explained by the key on the first page.
5. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Men's Golf This document is a compilation of responses from the men’s golf team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in yellow. The yellow highlighting stands for “positive” as explained by the key on the first page.
Student Surveys — Tennis Gianna May Sanchez
Contents of this tag:
1. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Men's Tennis This document is a compilation of responses from the men’s tennis team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in yellow and blue. The yellow highlighting stands for “positive” and blue stands for “negative” as explained by the key on the first page.
Student Surveys — All Responses Gianna May Sanchez
Contents of this tag:
1. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: UM Football Team This document is a compilation of responses from UM’s football team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in blue and yellow. Blue stands for “negative” and yellow stands for “positive” as explained by the key on the first page.
2. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Women's Track This document is a compilation of responses from the women’s track team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in blue and yellow. Blue stands for “negative” and yellow stands for “positive” as explained by the key on the first page.
3. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Women's Basketball
4. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Men's Gymnastics This document is a compilation of responses from the men’s gymnastics team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in blue and yellow. Blue stands for “negative” and yellow stands for “positive” as explained by the key on the first page.
5. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Women's Gymnastics This document is a compilation of responses from the women’s gymnastics team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in yellow. The yellow highlighting stands for “positive” as explained by the key on the first page.
6. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Soccer This document is a compilation of responses from the soccer team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in blue and yellow. Blue stands for “negative” and yellow stands for “positive” as explained by the key on the first page.
7. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Men's Golf This document is a compilation of responses from the men’s golf team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in yellow. The yellow highlighting stands for “positive” as explained by the key on the first page.
8. Men's Track and Cross-Country This document is a compilation of responses from the men’s track and cross-country team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in yellow and blue. The yellow highlighting stands for “positive” and blue stands for “negative” as explained by the key on the first page.
9. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Women's Golf This document is a compilation of responses from the women’s golf team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in blue and yellow. Blue stands for “negative” and yellow stands for “positive” as explained by the key on the first page.
10. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation: Men's Tennis This document is a compilation of responses from the men’s tennis team on their quantitative and qualitative responses to a SAPAC workshop. The specific year was taken out of the title to give anonymity to players. Comments that the processor of the original material found to be important are highlighted in yellow and blue. The yellow highlighting stands for “positive” and blue stands for “negative” as explained by the key on the first page.
11. SAPAC Workshop Evaluation