Sign in or register
for additional privileges

MACHINE DREAMS

Alexei Taylor, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Sources of fascination (2) - Representations of memory

It is said that less than a year before Descartes’ death, he was traveling to Sweden in the sea. With him was traveling his daughter, whom the sea men had never seen. One day, the sea men intruded in Descartes’ cabin in attempt to find the none-existent seemed daughter. During the process the sailors were met with a horrific seen of a human figure of a young girl confined inside a wooden box. The truth was that Descartes’ daughter had been dead for several years before the time and that the claimed daughter of his was said to be an automaton he had created with the appearance of his dead daughter. Whether this story is true or not is irrelevant to the point that Descartes had made a simulacrum of his dead daughter and had projected memories of her into the mechanism, carrying her around wherever he traveled like he would have done if she was still alive. Descartes thus resurrects his daughter from the dead and replaces her inside the body of an automaton named after her to give her the power of motion again. (Wood, 5)

But why was it necessary for Descartes to create a simulacrum of his dead daughter? Why wasn’t the memory of his daughter enough? The movie Hugo revolves around Hugo’s adamant attempt in fixing the broken automaton that he had been working on with his father, strongly believing that a message is left by his dead father within the machine. For Hugo, the time spent working on the automaton is equivalent to spending time with his dead father. Similarly, the process of creating a representation of a dead loved one is a constant reminder of the person and of all the memories associated.

Having a tangible reminder of the lost loved one is a stronger tool than mere intangible memories of them. Human memory, unlike the files saved in the hard drive of a computer, is a fragile form of data storage, as there is no certainty that it will continue to be available to be retrieved and to its original state. An object, on the other hand, can exist continuously to continue to remind us of the wanted memory. An automaton made to resemble a human figure not only is generally unaffected by time, but it has the ability the more closely represent the person through performing humanlike activities. The possibility of being able to revive the dead, most with a personal reason behind, has been one of the strongest motivations behind creations of automatons. For automatons created to serve this particular purpose, it is necessary for the machine to behave as humanlike as possible. This would be the one of the reasons why creators tend to facilitate automatons with somewhat unnecessary actions other than accomplishing its desired duty. For example, as the name of the machine states, the primary purpose of Jaquet-Droz’s the Writer is to write the pre-entered sentences on a piece of paper without mistake. However, the Writer does more than this. It is more as if the Writer’s task is not to simple write, but to perform the art of writing of humans. The graceful movement of the Writer, such as the tilting of the goose feather to prevent ink stains on the yet-to-be-written paper, is what amplifies the humanness of the machine.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Sources of fascination (2) - Representations of memory"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Automatons and its sources of fascination, page 5 of 9 Next page on path

Related:  Angry birds shirt tagsJaquet-Droz - "The Writer"HypothesisBibliographyEdison's Eve: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical LifeThe Uncannythe WriterHugo turns into an automatonAura handwrittenBershka and its connection to Angry BirdsAngry BirdsQuestionsBibliographySimulacraThe Human Touch: Towards a Historical Anthropology and Dream Analysis of Self-acting InstrumentsHugoNanook of the North, Robert FLAHERTY, 1921Phenakistoscope Phenakistiscope Optical Toy FantascopeHugo and the citySources of fascination (4) - Mechanization of menbackground for ethnographyDevelopment story of the Angry BirdsThe Bird's social purposeHugo magic trickThe WriterjiwonFinal essay - ProposalResourcesAutomata and Mimesis on the Stage of Theatre HistoryThe ideas and values behindTechnology used in automataPresence footprintsThe digesting duckMaintaining the Writerthe WriterConclusionGregory Barsamian - RunnerAre Humanzees Possible?Automatons and its sources of fascinationFrans Zwartjes "Spectator" (1970)What makes an observer modern; Jiwon ShinPersistence of visionThe technology behindFinal essay backgroundToothed wheelsAlteritySources of fascination (1) - Playing godGregory Barsamian - Feral FontSources of fascination (3) - Threat of automatonsEpistemologyThe Matrix PosterJaquet-Droz automatonsAuraPresenceSpectatorSymbolicMatrix - The pillAngry Birds as a social toolJaquet-Droz automataThe first encounterthe Writer - insideHybrid