Sign in or register
for additional privileges

MACHINE DREAMS

Alexei Taylor, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Hypothesis

The source of fascination for the automata is different for their spectators and their creators. The spectators of the automatons, they would feel the awe of the impossible and magic-like creation. Here, people start questioning what makes a human “human”, seeing a non-biological creation depicting a daily activity so delicately. While at the same time the conflicting feeling of fear would rest in the air. The knowledge that the automata would not age the way that the spectators do alienates the machines from them. The automata’s immortality is contrasted with the mortality of the spectators.

The making of an automaton requires a vast amount of time and handwork. The consequence of this long and arduous task is a mimesis of human being. For some makers, building a self-acting machine is like paying a tribute to the one that will resemble the machine. Creating a lifelike representation of the dead loved ones will “resurrect” them from their graves and embody the properties that their human counterparts once had. This can also give the maker the sensation of “playing god”, and the more taboo it seems, the stronger the sense of powerfulness. Attempts to create an automaton that could bleed and covering an automaton with an actual human skin are cases makes it seem that they were trying to make an ideal version of themselves; the immortal human.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Hypothesis"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Final essay - Proposal, page 2 of 4 Next page on path

Related:  ConclusionThe technology behindThe digesting duckAutomatons and its sources of fascinationPresence footprintsEpistemologybackground for ethnographyNanook of the North, Robert FLAHERTY, 1921The ideas and values behindHybridPhenakistoscope Phenakistiscope Optical Toy FantascopeAlteritySources of fascination (4) - Mechanization of menjiwonThe Matrix PosterJaquet-Droz automatonsJaquet-Droz - "The Writer"Angry birds shirt tagsMaintaining the WriterSources of fascination (1) - Playing godthe Writer - insideBibliographyHugo and the cityEdison's Eve: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical LifeSymbolicQuestionsHugo turns into an automatonHugo magic trickAuraMatrix - The pillAre Humanzees Possible?Angry Birds as a social toolGregory Barsamian - Feral FontTechnology used in automataSimulacraFinal essay backgroundBibliographySources of fascination (3) - Threat of automatonsResourcesBershka and its connection to Angry BirdsThe Bird's social purposeSpectatorAngry Birdsthe WriterHugoAura handwrittenThe Human Touch: Towards a Historical Anthropology and Dream Analysis of Self-acting InstrumentsGregory Barsamian - RunnerSources of fascination (2) - Representations of memoryJaquet-Droz automataPresenceThe first encounterPersistence of visionFrans Zwartjes "Spectator" (1970)Automata and Mimesis on the Stage of Theatre HistoryDevelopment story of the Angry BirdsToothed wheelsThe UncannyFinal essay - ProposalWhat makes an observer modern; Jiwon Shinthe WriterThe Writer