Many of the composition textbooks available to writing instructors are organized around the basic principles of argumentation. This book likewise understands that these principles--which center on the act of constructing well-supported claims--are necessary to master in order to produce strong written work in college. It does not, however, fully embrace the contention that
everything's an argument. We can understand that all knowledge is context-bound, participates in intellectual and political debates, and has been produced within a particular ideological framework, without conceding that everything we know is up for debate or simply a matter of how one argues. This book also does not subscribe to the assertion that what you say is motivated primarily by what
somebody else says (the claim we see in that screen shot to the right, from
this textbook). Your job as a writer is not to position yourself on some imagined spectrum of conclusions; nor is it to
point out why somebody else is wrong or misguided. Both are impoverished versions of intellectual engagement––and both have a way of making us feel compelled to respond in a manner that's ultimately unproductive and
unhealthy, even if it seems absolutely necessary or sort of fun.
I'm hoping to get you excited about academic research and writing, and I have found that pressuring students and early-career writers to have an argument about something they've only just started thinking about is not very encouraging in that respect. Indeed, much of what you'll hear me say about developing claims will de-emphasize the need for an argument in comparison to some of the textbooks used in other writing courses, even the more conciliatory or dialogic models of argumentation encouraged by the textbook whose cover appears to the right, They Say / I Say. In my long career of reading and learning, I've found that the best and most substantive written works may indeed have a broad thesis or argument, but they typically support them by offering multiple, smaller-scale arguments rather than a single one. I will encourage you to develop introductions and conclusions to your writing that ensure readers understand the purpose of your papers and that foreground your most important claims and arguments. At the same time, I will also instruct you to avoid conceiving of a single or simple "thesis statement" as the first and most important objective to fulfill when you write. While there are basic formulas you can use to craft a claim, only real, genuine learning will allow you to present a substantive one successfully.
