Bending Genres in Kindred
I found that addressing those serious themes through a modern style of writing made the issues easier to grasp and relate to. For example, with Uncle Tom’s Cabin, it was very easy to lose interest in the text and to find it really difficult to read (not only because of the language, but because of the narration style), while Kindred is a page turner and cannot be put down. The stark difference in my reading experiences between these two books is an issue of Bestsellerism.
Bestsellerism trends vary according to popular culture, while UTC was a huge success at the time of publication, it cannot draw the interest of the contemporary reader. What played a factor in Kinderd becoming a bestseller is blending genres, as with the example of Gone Girl.
The author is trying to bring attention to how the history of slavery still haunts modern Americans and that they shouldn’t wash their hands from the past. Dana's attitude pre-time travel was more like “it is in the past and it doesn’t affect me”, which is a modern view on the issue. Her experience in the past was necessary for her to claim an identity and to serve as a reminder. The fact that the book contrasts the two attitudes bluntly shocks readers into the realizing how serious the issue is. Because the book opens up conversations about outlook on race, which is a significant issue that appeals to a large mass of readers, it is attractive to them.
The novel is difficult to categorize because of the fact that it deals with so many different themes. It is a scientific fiction that deals with an exploration of human psychology as well as being a feminist text. Vint says in regards to categorizing Kindred that it is“Partly historical novel, partly slave narrative, and partly the story of how a twentieth century black woman comes to terms with slavery as her own and her nation's past”. It is a realistic spin on the idea of travel, which is usually foreign.
References
Sherryl Vint. “‘Only by Experience’: Embodiment and the Limitations of Realism in Neo-Slave Narratives.” Science Fiction Studies, vol. 34, no. 2, 2007, pp. 241–261. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/4241524.