The Digital Piranesi
This page was created by Alexis Kratzer. The last update was by Zoe Langer.
View of the Piazza Navona above the ruins of the Circus of Domitian (2 of 2)
The movement, fluidity, and force of the water, rendered by Piranesi with the utmost precision and dynamism, perhaps relates to how fountains served as a “metaphor [for] the preoccupation with urban boundaries” (San Juan, 129). Here, two figures in the center foreground wash their baskets for selling or carrying produce, demonstrating fountains’ civic function: they supplied water to the neighborhood and were essential to the running of the weekly food market. In this capacity, they occupy the realm of public space. As powerful symbols of authority, they were also used for courtly and religious festivals. Piranesi’s up-close depiction of the Fontana del Moro highlights the ways fountains anchored public space. Indeed, Piranesi renders the fountains with greater precision and detail than in the previous view, detailing, for example, the Egyptian hieroglyphs on the obelisk of Bernini’s Fontana dei Quattro Fiumi. The fountain shown here takes up the foreground and the majority of the composition, whereas it is barely visible in the preceding view. Depicted with an almost life-like quality, the streams of water gush from fantastical sea creatures, nymphs, and lions. Through the inventive combination of sculpture, engineering, and hydraulics, the fountain provides theatrical spectacle, aesthetic pleasure, aural delight, as well as utilitarian services for the benefit of the public. In this sense, fountains embody both form and function. They represent marvels of modern design and as well as innovations in hydraulics and engineering that reclaim the piazza for public use.
However, Piranesi underlines the significance of fountains not only to the articulation of space, but also to the discipline of architecture. Piranesi identifies Bernini and Michelangelo as the “architects” of the two principal fountains of the piazza in the annotations of the previous view. The text of the fifth annotation additionally designates the Fontana del Moro itself as a work of architecture: “Fontana, Architettura di Michelangelo.” Though it is now attributed to Giacomo della Porta, there was some debate about its author during Piranesi’s time. More important than the attribution itself is Piranesi’s insistence on assigning authorship to artists, particularly modern artists, in the Vedute di Roma, such as Nicola Salvi (the Trevi Fountain) and Ferdinando Fuga (Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore). Piranesi’s use of “architecture” as a discipline and authorial role in his annotations promotes the status of the architect as a designer, engineer, and inventor, clarifying both early modern conceptions of architecture and Piranesi’s self-identification as an “architect.” (ZL)
To see this image in the Vedute di Roma, volume 16 of Piranesi’s Opere, click here.