Thanks for your patience during our recent outage at scalar.usc.edu. While Scalar content is loading normally now, saving is still slow, and Scalar's 'additional metadata' features have been disabled, which may interfere with features like timelines and maps that depend on metadata. This also means that saving a page or media item will remove its additional metadata. If this occurs, you can use the 'All versions' link at the bottom of the page to restore the earlier version. We are continuing to troubleshoot, and will provide further updates as needed. Note that this only affects Scalar projects at scalar.usc.edu, and not those hosted elsewhere.
Main Menu Exploring The Tool Box Creating Digital Identities Constructing Data Working with Big Data Data Visualization Mapping Distant Reading Network Analysis Critical Platform Studies Postcolonial and Intersectional Digital Humanities DH Project Digital Humanities Certificate

What is Digital Humanities?

Metadata

Page

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Composite
is livescalar:isLive1
thumbnailart:thumbnailmedia/download.jpg
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-04-30T19:24:17-07:00

Version 12

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.12
versionnumberov:versionnumber12
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionModule I: A Theoretical Introduction
contentsioc:contentAs a diverse and still emerging field, there is no agreed-upon definition for the term "digital humanities." To capture the state of the field, the What is Digital Humanities? website, embedded above, provides users with a different definition every time the site is refreshed.

One source of disagreement concerns the relationship between the traditional and digital humanities. Whereas some scholars see a divide, others see the relationship between the two as a "spectrum," arguing that "all humanities scholars use digital practices and concepts to one degree or another" (Lincoln Mullen, 2010). On one end of this spectrum are scholars who use basic digital tools and resources, such as word processing programs and Google. On the other end are those who use computational methods in their research and/or produce scholarship that is interactive, hypertextual, virtual, networked and/or simulated. 

Annotation #1

In our first class discussion we will discuss some of the most salient characteristics of digital humanities work. To prepare, please read and collaboratively annotate:

1.Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. "A Short Guide To The Digital_Humanities" in Digital_Humanities. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012. Hypothesis link.
 

Why Annotate?

Annotating is a form of active reading where you record your critical engagement with a text. You can identify arguments, weigh evidence, evaluate sources, identify assumptions, pose questions and examine connections with other course materials and themes.

You should annotate as you read because it:

  • ensures that you engage actively on the first reading
  • minimizes the need to re-read
  • makes the organization and contribution of a text stand out

Annotating with Hypothes.is

In this course we will collaboratively annotate with the web-annotation app Hypothes.is, which allows you to tag, highlight, comment, reply, and embed media and links to online sources. To participate you will need to create a Hypothes.is account  (sign up here), add the Hypothes.is extension to your Chrome browser, and join our Hypothes.is group by signing into your account and visiting the link that’s been shared with you. Once you’ve joined our group "DH Fall 2019," that same link will serve as our group home page. At the group home page, you can see a list of group members with links to their annotations and links to the resources annotated by the group. You can also link away to a stream of annotations created by group members across various resources. For technical questions please consult Hypothes.is' Student Resource Guide and youtube playlist Tutorials.

Evaluating DH Projects

The project, as Anne Burdick et al. explain in the assigned reading, is the "basic unit" of DH scholarship. Because DH projects are both "continuous" and  "discontinuous" with traditional forms of humanities scholarship, they need to be evaluated based on their humanistic merits (i.e. use of evidence, argumentation, etc. ) and digital merits. Some questions to consider when evaluating the digital merits of a project include:
  • How is the project set up?
  • Who runs it, and who are its stakeholders?
  • What are its assets, structure, services and displays (technical definitions of these terms can be found here)? What values seem to be encoded in these elements? 
  • Who is the audience for this project? Does the audience already exist or does the project create a new community?
In recent years professional humanities organizations, such as the American Historical Association and the Modern Language Association, have published their own discipline-specific guidelines for evaluating digital scholarship. The AHA's guidelines can be found here; the MLA's here.  They have yet, however, to compile bibliographies and repositories of the DH scholarship conducted and  published in their fields. 

Locating DH Projects

So how do you go about finding DH projects? DH projects are often multi-year collaborative endeavors. As such, they are frequently housed in libraries (see this report) and research centers, such as the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University and the HumTech at UCLA.  One way to find DH projects, then, is to identify the major institutions in the field and search their collections. Because digital humanists regularly communicate via-twitter, you can also find out about projects by following prominent scholars and institutions as well as popular hashtags like #dh or #twitterstorians​. Finally, you can use Google like a scholar​ to search for DH projects related to particular topics and themes.

Assignment #1

For the first assignment locate and carry out a formal academic review of a digital humanities project that is not listed on the "Resources" page.  For tips on how to conduct and structure your review read The Public Historian Digital Project Review Guidelines and consult reviews that have been published in the journal. Post the review to your "Assignment #1" page of our Scalar workbook and be prepared to present your selected project to the class.

 
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-08-21T05:15:36-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 11

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.11
versionnumberov:versionnumber11
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionModule I: A Theoretical Introduction
contentsioc:contentAs a diverse and still emerging field, there is no agreed-upon definition for the term "digital humanities." To capture the state of the field, the What is Digital Humanities? website, embedded above, provides users with a different definition every time the site is refreshed.

One source of disagreement concerns the relationship between the traditional and digital humanities. Whereas some scholars see a divide, others see the relationship between the two as a "spectrum," arguing that "all humanities scholars use digital practices and concepts to one degree or another" (Lincoln Mullen, 2010). On one end of this spectrum are scholars who use basic digital tools and resources, such as word processing programs and Google. On the other end are those who use computational methods in their research and/or produce scholarship that is interactive, hypertextual, virtual, networked and/or simulated. 

Annotation #1

In our first class discussion we will discuss some of the most salient characteristics of digital humanities work. To prepare, please read and collaboratively annotate:

1.Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. "A Short Guide To The Digital_Humanities" in Digital_Humanities. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012. Hypothesis link.
 

Why Annotate?

Annotating is a form of active reading where you record your critical engagement with a text. You can identify arguments, weigh evidence, evaluate sources, identify assumptions, pose questions and examine connections with other course materials and themes.

You should annotate as you read because it:

  • ensures that you engage actively on the first reading
  • minimizes the need to re-read
  • makes the organization and contribution of a text stand out

Annotating with Hypothes.is

In this course we will collaboratively annotate with the web-annotation app Hypothes.is, which allows you to tag, highlight, comment, reply, and embed media and links to online sources. To participate you will need to create a Hypothes.is account  (sign up here), add the Hypothes.is extension to your Chrome browser, and join our Hypothes.is group by signing into your account and visiting the link that’s been shared with you. Once you’ve joined our group "Digital Humanities F2018," that same link will serve as our group home page. At the group home page, you can see a list of group members with links to their annotations and links to the resources annotated by the group. You can also link away to a stream of annotations created by group members across various resources. For technical questions please consult Hypothes.is' Student Resource Guide and youtube playlist Tutorials.

Evaluating DH Projects

The project, as Anne Burdick et al. explain in the assigned reading, is the "basic unit" of DH scholarship. Because DH projects are both "continuous" and  "discontinuous" with traditional forms of humanities scholarship, they need to be evaluated based on their humanistic merits (i.e. use of evidence, argumentation, etc. ) and digital merits. Some questions to consider when evaluating the digital merits of a project include:
  • How is the project set up?
  • Who runs it, and who are its stakeholders?
  • What are its assets, structure, services and displays (technical definitions of these terms can be found here)? What values seem to be encoded in these elements? 
  • Who is the audience for this project? Does the audience already exist or does the project create a new community?
In recent years professional humanities organizations, such as the American Historical Association and the Modern Language Association, have published their own discipline-specific guidelines for evaluating digital scholarship. The AHA's guidelines can be found here; the MLA's here.  They have yet, however, to compile bibliographies and repositories of the DH scholarship conducted and  published in their fields. 

Locating DH Projects

So how do you go about finding DH projects? DH projects are often multi-year collaborative endeavors. As such, they are frequently housed in libraries (see this report) and research centers, such as the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University and the HumTech at UCLA.  One way to find DH projects, then, is to identify the major institutions in the field and search their collections. Because digital humanists regularly communicate via-twitter, you can also find out about projects by following prominent scholars and institutions as well as popular hashtags like #dh or #twitterstorians​. Finally, you can use Google like a scholar​ to search for DH projects related to particular topics and themes.

Assignment #1

For the first assignment locate and carry out a formal academic review of a digital humanities project that is not listed on the "Resources" page.  For tips on how to conduct and structure your review read The Public Historian Digital Project Review Guidelines and consult reviews that have been published in the journal. Post the review to your "Assignment #1" page of our Scalar workbook and be prepared to present your selected project to the class.

 
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-08-20T09:40:37-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 10

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.10
versionnumberov:versionnumber10
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionModule I: A Theoretical Introduction
contentsioc:contentAs a diverse and still emerging field, there is no agreed-upon definition for the term "digital humanities." To capture the state of the field, the What is Digital Humanities? website, embedded above, provides users with a different definition every time the site is refreshed.

One source of disagreement concerns the relationship between the traditional and digital humanities. Whereas some scholars see a divide, others see the relationship between the two as a "spectrum," arguing that "all humanities scholars use digital practices and concepts to one degree or another" (Lincoln Mullen, 2010). On one end of this spectrum are scholars who use basic digital tools and resources, such as word processing programs and Google. On the other end are those who use computational methods in their research and/or produce scholarship that is interactive, hypertextual, virtual, networked and/or simulated. 

Annotation #1

In our first class discussion we will discuss some of the most salient characteristics of digital humanities work. To prepare, please read and collaboratively annotate:

1.Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. "A Short Guide To The Digital_Humanities" in Digital_Humanities. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012. Hypothesis link.
 

Why Annotate?

Annotating is a form of active reading where you record your critical engagement with a text. You can identify arguments, weigh evidence, evaluate sources, identify assumptions, pose questions and examine connections with other course materials and themes.

You should annotate as you read because it:

  • ensures that you engage actively on the first reading
  • minimizes the need to re-read
  • makes the organization and contribution of a text stand out

Annotating with Hypothes.is

In this course we will collaboratively annotate with the web-annotation app Hypothes.is, which allows you to tag, highlight, comment, reply, and embed media and links to online sources. To participate you will need to create a Hypothes.is account  (sign up here), add the Hypothes.is extension to your Chrome browser, and join our Hypothes.is group by signing into your account and visiting the link that’s been shared with you. Once you’ve joined our group "Digital Humanities F2018," that same link will serve as our group home page. At the group home page, you can see a list of group members with links to their annotations and links to the resources annotated by the group. You can also link away to a stream of annotations created by group members across various resources. For technical questions please consult Hypothes.is' Student Resource Guide and youtube playlist Tutorials.

Evaluating DH Projects

The project, as Anne Burdick et al. explain in the assigned reading, is the "basic unit" of DH scholarship. Because DH projects are both "continuous" and  "discontinuous" with traditional forms of humanities scholarship, they need to be evaluated based on their humanistic merits (i.e. use of evidence, argumentation, etc. ) and digital merits. Some questions to consider when evaluating the digital merits of a project include:
  • How is the project set up?
  • Who runs it, and who are its stakeholders?
  • What are its assets, structure, services and displays (technical definitions of these terms can be found here)? What values seem to be encoded in these elements? 
  • Who is the audience for this project? Does the audience already exist or does the project create a new community?
In recent years professional humanities organizations, such as the American Historical Association and the Modern Language Association, have published their own discipline-specific guidelines for evaluating digital scholarship. The AHA's guidelines can be found here; the MLA's here.  They have yet, however, to compile bibliographies and repositories of the DH scholarship conducted and  published in their fields. 

Locating DH Projects

So how do you go about finding DH projects? DH projects are often multi-year collaborative endeavors. As such, they are frequently housed in libraries (see this report) and research centers, such as the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University and the HumTech at UCLA.  One way to find DH projects, then, is to identify the major institutions in the field and search their collections. Because digital humanists regularly communicate via-twitter, you can also find out about projects by following prominent scholars and institutions as well as popular hashtags like #dh or #twitterstorians​. Finally, you can use Google like a scholar​ to search for DH projects related to particular topics and themes.

Assignment #1

For the first assignment locate and carry out a formal academic review of a digital humanities project that is not listed on the "Resources" page.  For tips on how to conduct and structure your review read The Public Historian Digital Project Review Guidelines and consult reviews that have been published in the journal. Post the review to your "Assignment #1" page of our Scalar workbook and be prepared to present your selected project to the class.

 
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-08-20T05:21:54-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 9

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.9
versionnumberov:versionnumber9
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionModule I: A Theoretical Introduction
contentsioc:contentAs a diverse and still emerging field, there is no agreed-upon definition for the term "digital humanities." To capture the state of the field, the What is Digital Humanities? website, embedded above, provides users with a different definition every time the site is refreshed.

One source of disagreement concerns the relationship between the traditional and digital humanities. Whereas some scholars see a divide, others see the relationship between the two as a "spectrum," arguing that "all humanities scholars use digital practices and concepts to one degree or another" (Lincoln Mullen, 2010). On one end of this spectrum are scholars who use basic digital tools and resources, such as word processing programs and Google. On the other end are those who use computational methods in their research and/or produce scholarship that is interactive, hypertextual, virtual, networked and/or simulated. 

Annotation #1

In our first class discussion we will discuss some of the most salient characteristics of digital humanities work. To prepare, please read and collaboratively annotate:

1.Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. "A Short Guide To The Digital_Humanities" in Digital_Humanities. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012. Hypothesis link.
 

Why Annotate?

Annotating is a form of active reading where you record your critical engagement with a text. You can identify arguments, weigh evidence, evaluate sources, identify assumptions, pose questions and examine connections with other course materials and themes.

You should annotate as you read because it:

  • ensures that you engage actively on the first reading
  • minimizes the need to re-read
  • makes the organization and contribution of a text stand out

Annotating with Hypothes.is

In this course we will collaboratively annotate with the web-annotation app Hypothes.is, which allows you to tag, highlight, comment, reply, and embed media and links to online sources. To participate you will need to create a Hypothes.is account  (sign up here), add the Hypothes.is extension to your Chrome browser, and join our Hypothes.is group by signing into your account and visiting the link that’s been shared with you. Once you’ve joined our group "Digital Humanities F2018," that same link will serve as our group home page. At the group home page, you can see a list of group members with links to their annotations and links to the resources annotated by the group. You can also link away to a stream of annotations created by group members across various resources. For technical questions please consult Hypothes.is' Student Resource Guide and youtube playlist Tutorials.

Evaluating DH Projects

The project, as Anne Burdick et al. explain in the assigned reading, is the "basic unit" of DH scholarship. Because DH projects are both "continuous" and  "discontinuous" with traditional forms of humanities scholarship, they need to be evaluated based on their humanistic merits (i.e. use of evidence, argumentation, etc. ) and digital merits. Some questions to consider when evaluating the digital merits of a project include:
  • How is the project set up?
  • Who runs it, and who are its stakeholders?
  • What are its assets, structure, services and displays (technical definitions of these terms can be found here)? What values seem to be encoded in these elements? 
  • Who is the audience for this project? Does the audience already exist or does the project create a new community?
In recent years professional humanities organizations, such as the American Historical Association and the Modern Language Association, have published their own discipline-specific guidelines for evaluating digital scholarship. The AHA's guidelines can be found here; the MLA's here.  They have yet, however, to compile bibliographies and repositories of the DH scholarship conducted and  published in their fields. 

Locating DH Projects

So how do you go about finding DH projects? DH projects are often multi-year collaborative endeavors. As such, they are frequently housed in libraries (see this report) and research centers, such as the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University and the Center for Digital Humanities at UCLA.  One way to find DH projects, then, is to identify the major institutions in the field and search their collections. Because digital humanists regularly communicate via-twitter, you can also find out about projects by following prominent scholars and institutions as well as popular hashtags like #dh or #twitterstorians​. Finally, you can use Google like a scholar​ to search for DH projects related to particular topics and themes.

Assignment #1

For the first assignment locate and carry out a formal academic review of a digital humanities project that is not listed on the "Resources" page.  For tips on how to conduct and structure your review read The Public Historian Digital Project Review Guidelines and consult reviews that have been published in the journal. Post the review to your "Assignment #1" page of our Scalar workbook and be prepared to present your selected project to the class.

 
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-05-26T15:26:43-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 8

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.8
versionnumberov:versionnumber8
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionModule I: A Theoretical Introduction
contentsioc:contentAs a diverse and still emerging field, there is no agreed-upon definition for the term "digital humanities." To capture the state of the field, the What is Digital Humanities? website, embedded above, provides users with a different definition every time the site is refreshed.

One source of disagreement concerns the relationship between the traditional and digital humanities. Whereas some scholars see a divide, others see the relationship between the two as a "spectrum," arguing that "all humanities scholars use digital practices and concepts to one degree or another" (Lincoln Mullen, 2010). On one end of this spectrum are scholars who use basic digital tools and resources, such as word processing programs and Google. On the other end are those who use computational methods in their research and/or produce scholarship that is interactive, hypertextual, virtual, networked and/or simulated. 

Annotation #1

In our first class discussion we will examine some of the theoretical questions that animate these definitional debates. To prepare, please read and collaboratively annotate:

1.Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. "A Short Guide To The Digital_Humanities" in Digital_Humanities. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012. Hypothesis link.
 

Why Annotate?

Annotating is a form of active reading where you record your critical engagement with a text. You can identify arguments, weigh evidence, evaluate sources, identify assumptions, pose questions and examine connections with other course materials and themes.

You should annotate as you read because it:

  • ensures that you engage actively on the first reading
  • minimizes the need to re-read
  • makes the organization and contribution of a text stand out

Annotating with Hypothes.is

In this course we will collaboratively annotate with the web-annotation app Hypothes.is, which allows you to tag, highlight, comment, reply, and embed media and links to online sources. To participate you will need to create a Hypothes.is account  (sign up here), add the Hypothes.is extension to your Chrome browser, and join our Hypothes.is group by signing into your account and visiting the link that’s been shared with you. Once you’ve joined our group "Digital Humanities F2018," that same link will serve as our group home page. At the group home page, you can see a list of group members with links to their annotations and links to the resources annotated by the group. You can also link away to a stream of annotations created by group members across various resources. For technical questions please consult Hypothes.is' Student Resource Guide and youtube playlist Tutorials.

Evaluating DH Projects

The project, as Anne Burdick et al. explain in the assigned reading, is the "basic unit" of DH scholarship. Because DH projects are both "continuous" and  "discontinuous" with traditional forms of humanities scholarship, they need to be evaluated based on their humanistic merits (i.e. use of evidence, argumentation, etc. ) and digital merits. Some questions to consider when evaluating the digital merits of a project include:
  • How is the project set up?
  • Who runs it, and who are its stakeholders?
  • What are its assets, structure, services and displays (technical definitions of these terms can be found here)? What values seem to be encoded in these elements? 
  • Who is the audience for this project? Does the audience already exist or does the project create a new community?
In recent years professional humanities organizations, such as the American Historical Association and the Modern Language Association, have published their own discipline-specific guidelines for evaluating digital scholarship. The AHA's guidelines can be found here; the MLA's here.  They have yet, however, to compile bibliographies and repositories of the DH scholarship conducted and  published in their fields. 

Locating DH Projects

So how do you go about finding DH projects? DH projects are often multi-year collaborative endeavors. As such, they are frequently housed in libraries (see this report) and research centers, such as the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University and the Center for Digital Humanities at UCLA.  One way to find DH projects, then, is to identify the major institutions in the field and search their collections. Because digital humanists regularly communicate via-twitter, you can also find out about projects by following prominent scholars and institutions as well as popular hashtags like #dh or #twitterstorians​. Finally, you can use Google like a scholar​ to search for DH projects related to particular topics and themes.

Assignment #1

For the first assignment locate and carry out a formal academic review of a digital humanities project that is not listed on the "Resources" page.  For tips on how to conduct and structure your review read The Public Historian Digital Project Review Guidelines and consult reviews that have been published in the journal. Post the review to your "Assignment #1" page of our Scalar workbook and be prepared to present your selected project to the class.

 
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-05-20T09:25:24-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 7

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.7
versionnumberov:versionnumber7
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionModule I: A Theoretical Introduction
contentsioc:contentAs a diverse and still emerging field, there is no agreed-upon definition for the term "digital humanities." To capture the state of the field, the What is Digital Humanities? website, embedded above, provides users with a different definition every time the site is refreshed.

One source of disagreement concerns the relationship between the traditional and digital humanities. Whereas some scholars see a divide, others see the relationship between the two as a "spectrum," arguing that "all humanities scholars use digital practices and concepts to one degree or another" (Lincoln Mullen, 2010). On one end of this spectrum are scholars who use basic digital tools and resources, such as word processing programs and Google. On the other end are those who use computational methods in their research and/or produce scholarship that is interactive, hypertextual, virtual, networked and/or simulated. 

Annotation #1

In our first class discussion we will examine some of the theoretical questions that animate these definitional debates. To prepare, please read and collaboratively annotate the following:

1.Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. "A Short Guide To The Digital_Humanities" in Digital_Humanities. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012. Hypothesis link.
 

Why Annotate?

Annotating is a form of active reading where you record your critical engagement with a text. You can identify arguments, weigh evidence, evaluate sources, identify assumptions, pose questions and examine connections with other course materials and themes.

You should annotate as you read because it:

  • ensures that you engage actively on the first reading
  • minimizes the need to re-read
  • makes the organization and contribution of a text stand out

Annotating with Hypothes.is

In this course we will collaboratively annotate with the web-annotation app Hypothes.is, which allows you to tag, highlight, comment, reply, and embed media and links to online sources. To participate you will need to create a Hypothes.is account  (sign up here), add the Hypothes.is extension to your Chrome browser, and join our Hypothes.is group by signing into your account and visiting the link that’s been shared with you. Once you’ve joined our group "Digital Humanities F2018," that same link will serve as our group home page. At the group home page, you can see a list of group members with links to their annotations and links to the resources annotated by the group. You can also link away to a stream of annotations created by group members across various resources. For technical questions please consult Hypothes.is' Student Resource Guide and youtube playlist Tutorials.

Evaluating DH Projects

The project, as Anne Burdick et al. explain in the assigned reading, is the "basic unit" of DH scholarship. Because DH projects are both "continuous" and  "discontinuous" with traditional forms of humanities scholarship, they need to be evaluated based on their humanistic merits (i.e. use of evidence, argumentation, etc. ) and digital merits. Some questions to consider when evaluating the digital merits of a project include:
  • How is the project set up?
  • Who runs it, and who are its stakeholders?
  • What are its assets, structure, services and displays (technical definitions of these terms can be found here)? What values seem to be encoded in these elements? 
  • Who is the audience for this project? Does the audience already exist or does the project create a new community?
In recent years professional humanities organizations, such as the American Historical Association and the Modern Language Association, have published their own discipline-specific guidelines for evaluating digital scholarship. The AHA's guidelines can be found here; the MLA's here.  They have yet, however, to compile bibliographies and repositories of the DH scholarship conducted and  published in their fields. 

Locating DH Projects

So how do you go about finding DH projects? DH projects are often multi-year collaborative endeavors. As such, they are frequently housed in libraries (see this report) and research centers, such as the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University and the Center for Digital Humanities at UCLA.  One way to find DH projects, then, is to identify the major institutions in the field and search their collections. Because digital humanists regularly communicate via-twitter, you can also find out about projects by following prominent scholars and institutions as well as popular hashtags like #dh or #twitterstorians​. Finally, you can use Google like a scholar​ to search for DH projects related to particular topics and themes.

Assignment #1

For this topic's assignment locate and carry out a formal academic review of a digital humanities project that is not listed on the "Resources" page.  For tips on how to conduct and structure your review read The Public Historian Digital Project Review Guidelines and consult reviews that have been published in the journal. Post the review to your "Assignment #1" page of our Scalar workbook and be prepared to present your selected project to the class.

 
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-05-01T15:23:29-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 6

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.6
versionnumberov:versionnumber6
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionModule I: A Theoretical Introduction
contentsioc:contentAs a diverse and still emerging field, there is no agreed-upon definition for the term "digital humanities." To capture the state of the field, the What is Digital Humanities? website, embedded above, provides users with a different definition every time the site is refreshed.

One source of disagreement concerns the relationship between the traditional and digital humanities. Whereas some scholars see a divide, others see the relationship between the two as a "spectrum," arguing that "all humanities scholars use digital practices and concepts to one degree or another" (Lincoln Mullen, 2010). On one end of this spectrum are scholars who use basic digital tools and resources, such as word processing programs and Google. On the other end are those who use computational methods in their research and/or produce scholarship that is interactive, hypertextual, virtual, networked and/or simulated. 

Annotation #1

In our first class discussion we will examine some of the theoretical questions that animate these definitional debates. To prepare, please read and collaboratively annotate the following:

1.Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. "A Short Guide To The Digital_Humanities" in Digital_Humanities. Open Access. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012. Hypothesis link.

2. Kirschenbaum, Matthew. “What Is ‘Digital Humanities,’ and Why Are They Saying Such Terrible Things about It?” Differences 25, no. 1 (2014). Hypothesis link.
 

Why Annotate?

Annotating is a form of active reading where you record your critical engagement with a text. You can identify arguments, weigh evidence, evaluate sources, identify assumptions, pose questions and examine connections with other course materials and themes.

You should annotate as you read because it:

  • ensures that you engage actively on the first reading
  • minimizes the need to re-read
  • makes the organization and contribution of a text stand out

Annotating with Hypothes.is

In this course we will collaboratively annotate with the web-annotation app Hypothes.is, which allows you to tag, highlight, comment, reply, and embed media and links to online sources. To participate you will need to create a Hypothes.is account  (sign up here), add the Hypothes.is extension to your Chrome browser, and join our Hypothes.is group by signing into your account and visiting the link that’s been shared with you. Once you’ve joined our group "Digital Humanities F2018," that same link will serve as our group home page. At the group home page, you can see a list of group members with links to their annotations and links to the resources annotated by the group. You can also link away to a stream of annotations created by group members across various resources. For technical questions please consult Hypothes.is' Student Resource Guide and youtube playlist Tutorials.

Evaluating DH Projects

The project, as Anne Burdick et al. explain in the assigned reading, is the "basic unit" of DH scholarship. Because DH projects are both "continuous" and  "discontinuous" with traditional forms of humanities scholarship, they need to be evaluated based on their humanistic merits (i.e. use of evidence, argumentation, etc. ) and digital merits. Some questions to consider when evaluating the digital merits of a project include:
  • How is the project set up?
  • Who runs it, and who are its stakeholders?
  • What are its assets, structure, services and displays (technical definitions of these terms can be found here)? What values seem to be encoded in these elements? 
  • Who is the audience for this project? Does the audience already exist or does the project create a new community?
In recent years professional humanities organizations, such as the American Historical Association and the Modern Language Association, have published their own discipline-specific guidelines for evaluating digital scholarship. The AHA's guidelines can be found here; the MLA's here.  They have yet, however, to compile bibliographies and repositories of the DH scholarship conducted and  published in their fields. 

Locating DH Projects

So how do you go about finding DH projects? DH projects are often multi-year collaborative endeavors. As such, they are frequently housed in libraries (see this report) and research centers, such as the Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media at George Mason University and the Center for Digital Humanities at UCLA.  One way to find DH projects, then, is to identify the major institutions in the field and search their collections. Because digital humanists regularly communicate via-twitter, you can also find out about projects by following prominent scholars and institutions as well as popular hashtags like #dh or #twitterstorians​. Finally, you can use Google like a scholar​ to search for DH projects related to particular topics and themes.

Assignment #1

For this week's assignment locate and carry out a formal academic review of a digital humanities project that is not listed on the "Resources" page. For tips on how to conduct and structure your review read The Public Historian Digital Project Review Guidelines and consult reviews that have been published in the journal. Post the review to your "Assignment #1" page of our Scalar workbook and be prepared to present your selected project to the class.

 
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-04-30T20:27:41-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 5

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.5
versionnumberov:versionnumber5
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionModule I: A Theoretical Introduction
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-04-30T20:12:30-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 4

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.4
versionnumberov:versionnumber4
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionModule I: A Theoretical Introduction
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-04-30T19:43:11-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 3

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.3
versionnumberov:versionnumber3
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionModule I: A Theoretical Introduction
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-04-30T19:40:30-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 2

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.2
versionnumberov:versionnumber2
titledcterms:titleWhat is Digital Humanities?
descriptiondcterms:descriptionA Theoretical Introduction
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-04-30T19:37:59-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version

Version 1

resourcerdf:resourcehttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/topic-1what-is-digital-humanities-a-theoretical-introduction.1
versionnumberov:versionnumber1
titledcterms:titleTopic 1: What is Digital Humanities? A Theoretical Introduction
default viewscalar:defaultViewplain
was attributed toprov:wasAttributedTohttps://scalar.usc.edu/works/intro-to-dh-hs3393/users/20972
createddcterms:created2019-04-30T19:24:17-07:00
typerdf:typehttp://scalar.usc.edu/2012/01/scalar-ns#Version
Show all versions View as RDF-XML View as RDF-JSON