Sign in or register
for additional privileges

ENGL665: Teaching Writing with Technology

Shelley Rodrigo, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Amy Reading Challenge NL6 (Week 7)

I knew I wanted to try my hand at creating an infographic, as others have already done using Piktochart. I thought I’d try out a different program for comparison purposes. In my research I found a web site that provided a list of likely candidates (edudemic.com), which also provided a few very interesting links on assessment and learning – “13 Reasons Your Brain Craves Infographics” by Jeff Dunn (13 June 2013). With such a title, and given this week’s chapter assignment, “The Nature of Learning,” this seemed a -- ahem – no-brainer.


The New Learning book in particular seems to lend itself to such a visual representation.


Easel.ly is another infographic creation program (free) found on the web. Thanks to the aforementioned article, I learned there are interactive infographics out there too, and even though these visual concept summary tools usually cater to mass consumption (at least, according to Dunn), I thought of how this reaffirms the theory that our brains’ learning mechanisms are “social” (Kalantzis and Cope), whether online or in f2f classrooms.


I do think the Easel.ly program may be less versatile than Piktochart. I noticed the canvas on which I created this infogram seemed small, and while I did use  template based on its division into four areas (to match the four dimensions organizing the chapter’s contents), this just didn’t seem as visually informative a space as the Piktochart I’ve seen others use.


However, it did allow me to import images, not just use the “canned” images included. The text/image creation tools were a bit inflexible. For example, if I wanted to change font colors in a bullet list, I found I would have to create an entirely separate text box for that part. Change the font color for one letter, change it for all.


Overall, the program may be basic enough for students, offering “just enough” design controls without overwhelming them. I wonder, however, if students might be discouraged by the lack of variety offered by the free programs, and how that might affect their rhetorical choices (thinking of how the materiality / structure actually impedes or controls their agency here).




I reviewed Heather's Easel.ly project this week which was conveniently on the same chapter AND the same program as I selected! (As Heather said, great minds...?) . I must say, I like Heather's rendition of the chapter better because of the design choices. As Heather had already created one Infographic using Piktochart, she seemed more adept at the Infographic genre, using text blocks rather than my more image-centered strategy. I am a big fan of Vygotsky, so really appreciate the dominant position she awarded his ZPD graphic!

I also reviewed Kim's Prezi approach of this week's BR chapter.
I really appreciated her breakdown of the ways Prezie creates / enforces its own hierarchy upon users, unlike PowerPoint in ways, and how this might affect students. This made me think of how the very structure / materialism becomes an affordance for student-centered teaching / learning. Specifically, I was thinking how an assignment that asks students to use Prezi (perhaps for notes, source summation, argument representation) but to metacognitively reflect on the "how" of their construction choices.
Join this page's discussion (1 comment)
 

Discussion of "Amy Reading Challenge NL6 (Week 7)"

Comment on Amy Reading Challenge NL 6 (week 7)-Heather

I was really interesting in seeing what you did in Eas_ly, since I used the same program for the same chapter is you (great minds think alike)! I think that your execution was more successful than mine was. I like your info graphic a lot. It is interesting that you pondered, "I wonder, however, if students might be discouraged by the lack of variety offered by the free programs, and how that might affect their rhetorical choices (thinking of how the materiality / structure actually impedes or controls their agency here)." Since we have been discussing infrastructural limitations and materiality, I think that is a question that deserves some thought!

Posted on 7 October 2014, 8:16 pm by Heather Laslie  |  Permalink

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Amy Locklear's Mini-Bio, page 12 of 20 Next page on path