Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Plant, Mehdiganj, Uttar Pradesh, March 30, 2008.
1 2017-12-09T20:01:01-08:00 Amanda Ciafone 0aef7449200e57e794d451fa2ca99b0795928eaf 15200 1 Amanda Ciafone, Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Plant, Mehdiganj, Uttar Pradesh, March 30, 2008. plain 2017-12-09T20:01:01-08:00 Amanda Ciafone 0aef7449200e57e794d451fa2ca99b0795928eafThis page is referenced by:
-
1
media/All Over the World Coca Cola Brings Refreshment Larger cropped.jpg
media/water for life cropped Screen Shot 2017-11-22 at 1.02.59 AM copy.jpg
2017-12-09T20:15:11-08:00
"Water Mining" in Mehdiganj
2
image_header
2017-12-09T22:23:43-08:00
These women and many others in their villages are primarily poor farmers, landless agricultural workers, many indigenous Adivasis and low caste Dalits. They were protesting the plants’ pollution of surrounding agricultural lands by industrial effluent, and more markedly, plants’ daily extraction of 600,000 liters of water a day (on average, and up to 1.5 million during the summer months) to produce soft drinks and bottled water – exacerbating and degrading the falling water table. Villagers and activists called this “water mining.”[i]
Water extraction is virtually unregulated as a colonial era law gives landowners private property rights not only to their land but whatever groundwater lies underneath and few Indian states have implemented water resources legislation.[ii] And while law does provide for the collection of a tax on water consumed by industry, the charges are so miniscule that heavy water uses like Coca-Cola can draw groundwater virtually for free. For all the water it withdrew in Mehdiganj during 2005-2006, the plant paid a water tax of just $717.57 for the year.[iii]
In fact, the Company located much of its production in these rural, primarily agricultural communities outside of larger metropolitan areas to access reserves of water as well as cheap labor. This was in line with the liberalizing Indian government’s shift from state- to market-led forces to fuel the economic development of rural India as it disavowed previous rural economic social welfare policies and neglected the lack of environmental regulation and water scarcity across the country, to encourage industries to invest in “underdeveloped” or “backward” areas, in the language of the Indian state.[i] This paper builds upon interviews with over 60 residents and activists of Mehdiganj, Uttar Pradesh, Kala Dera, Rajasthan, and Plachimada, Kerala in the spring of 2008.[ii] Ibid., 220. A few states had instituted water policies of their own prior to this National Water Policy, for example, Uttar Pradesh in 1999.[iii] The Easement Act of 1882 as discussed in (TERI), "Independent Third Party Assessment of Coca-Cola Facilities in India," 90. For all the water it withdrew in Mehdiganj during 2005-2006, the plant paid a water cess of just Rs. 31,573.00 or $717.57, with an average exchange rate of around Rs. 44.00/1 dollar in 2005-2006. Ibid., 223.
