No more heroes : grassroots challenges to the savior mentality
1 2021-03-31T12:46:02-07:00 Natalie K Meyers 4b3948ab8901940da5f2eb884c2cc86b3dc6ac22 33948 2 Jordan Flaherty, No More Heroes : Grassroots Challenges to the Savior Mentality, 2017. plain 2021-04-20T15:36:36-07:00 2017 Flaherty, Jordan. 2017. No More Heroes : Grassroots Challenges to the Savior Mentality. book Flaherty, Jordan, 978-1-84935-266-6 1-84935-266-6 Kim Stathers b8f352d1ce6eb714d5242702eaa05362c8eae357This page has tags:
- 1 media/dctermstimeline.png 2021-04-12T00:11:25-07:00 Natalie K Meyers 4b3948ab8901940da5f2eb884c2cc86b3dc6ac22 Genealogy of Refusal Timeline Natalie K Meyers 36 timeline 2021-09-14T21:36:29-07:00 Natalie K Meyers 4b3948ab8901940da5f2eb884c2cc86b3dc6ac22
This page is referenced by:
-
1
media/COWLMotivation.png
2021-04-08T13:36:18-07:00
The invocation of crisis narratives is relentless
39
plain
2021-09-14T13:18:08-07:00
By compounding crises, leaders can solidify power in an urgent fashion. Klein taught this in Shock Doctrine and such consolidation can gain dreadful momentum when a community faces cyclic or concurrent crises. The "Once glorious kingdom under threat" narrative combined with a real, tangible, and physical crisis, such as global pandemic creates an environment rich for exploitation and power consolidation (Spector 2019). Power absorbs labour, especially saviour labour, and its appetite is relentless.
Crises, especially those which are constructed to tell a narrative, are used to harness attention. Media studies show that time and time again, urgent crises will draw readers, listeners, and viewers, even to the point that we find ourselves hanging on to the edge of our seats, waiting to know if we've actually been invaded by extraterrestrials (War of the Worlds, anyone?).In No More Heroes: Grassroots Challenges to the Savior Mentality, Jordan Flaherty says:
The Savior mentality always looks for solutions by working within our current system., because deeper change might push us out of the picture. This focus on quick fixes is partly the product of an outrage oriented media. (Flaherty 2016)
Trabian Shorters observes that:
Human beings are hardwired to create and act upon narratives. We crave the moral direction stories provide. And whether we know it or not, we constantly default to these narratives, which often place white men at the front of history. Sure, it’s a very exciting and empowering narrative to those born white and male, but for everyone else, it raises questions about their own value in the world. (Pliska 2018)
The narrative arc for telling 'librarian-as-saviour' stories often describes a librarian rising admirably beyond their anticipated call of service. It's true that librarians have trained to administer life-saving overdose medications like naloxone. It's true that librarians have provided day-to-day special services to mitigate displacements that occur in lives punctuated by addiction extending their jobs from reference to public services, becoming de facto conduits for information about food stamps, welfare, housing assistance, and other critically needed support. These are librarians who have met their patrons at their perceived "point of need" in a multitude of ways they didn't train for in library school.
But, somewhat destructively, as Flaherty points out the librarian-as-saviour crisis narrative is visible and repeated because it is a story that's easy to tell not because it is a story that will take us to a better place. It can just as easily be characterized as a narrative that is nothing more than the "logical result of a racist, colonialist capitalist hetero-patriarchal system setting us against each other":Saviors want to support the struggles of communities that are not their own, but they believe they must remain in charge. The savior always wants to lead, never to follow. When the people they have chosen to rescue tell them the are not helping, they think those people are mistaken. It is almost taken as evidence that they need more help .
(Flaherty, 2016)We emphasize throughout this multimedia experience that how "when we know what's going on" we can push back against crisis-driven constructed scarcity. That instead of being perpetually beholden to a vocational notion of self-sacrifice that crisis is responded to best when a saviour is there to be the remedy we could instead get around to listening to, and better knowing, our communities from the point of view of their strengths. The comic below illustrates how our better nature can be present in the midst of crisis narratives, and we can still be taken advantage of, underscoring that the more we know about what is going on and the more we collectively share our knowledge, the better equipped we are to respond when power doubles down on us during a crisis.
-
1
2021-02-14T17:00:50-08:00
No individual solution to our problems
34
Debunking myths that hold us back to enable collective ways of moving forward
plain
2021-08-13T12:58:40-07:00
In the “The Dangers of Cynical Sci-Fi Disaster Stories” Cory Doctorow talks about "the characters’ dawning realization that there is no individual solution to their problems—that the kind of systemic change they want is a team sport and has to include people usually left on the sidelines in tech fights" (Doctorow 2020).
In “Librarians of the World Unite!” a cartoon published in The Nib during the coronavirus pandemic we get a glimpse of how weak we are when we can't communicate with one another and how much change we can achieve if we organize ourselves to understand our common circumstances better.
It's essential to organize to accomplish anything for a whole profession of people. In Cory Doctorow's For the Win the protagonists build a movement that can challenge the status quo and along the way readers find out just how hard fought and hard won are their gains. Those of us in the profession of librarianship, just like the mercenary gamers in For the Win, have reasons to seek change. In “Collective Responsibility: Seeking Equity for Contingent Labor in Libraries, Archives, and Museums" we come face to face with voices that must be heard (Drabinski 2019).
In “Black Study, Black Struggle" Robin Kelley reminds us of how "the university possesses a unique teleology: it is supposed to be an enlightened space free of bias and prejudice, but the pursuit of this promise is hindered by structural racism and patriarchy. Kelley has a lot to teach us about the universities we work in, and the ways they are perceived by the students who study at them and the professors who work at them. He talks about both "modest and more radical critics of universities" and how "Both demand that universities change in ways that we cannot expect them to change" (Kelley 2016). He argues that universities are not up the task [of modest or radical change] and leaves us with the notion that while "universities can and will become more diverse and marginally more welcoming for black students" that "as institutions they will never be engines of social transformation" (Kelley 2016).
Why? We must ask this question, for as academic librarians our jobs and our libraries are situated inside these very same universities. There's not one university for the students and another for the library. Kelley reminds us that the university won't be the engine for transformation because "Such a task is ultimately the work of political education and activism. By definition it takes place outside the university" (Kelley 2016). Perhaps some of what we seek for and from libraries has to be similarly situated, and informed by the hard-won knowledge Robin Kelley shares; perhaps the change we seek has to happen wholly or partly outside the library because it can't happen through it?
For us, as librarians, there is no single solution or snake oil to repair all our profession's problems. Studious librarian Barbara Gordon aka Batgirl lobbied for equal pay back in 1974 but the most recent AAUP Faculty Compensation Survey and the CAUT Almanac of Post-Secondary Education in Canada demonstrate that universities haven't quite caught up.
Taking up Doctorow's message acknowledges how we will come up with better solutions if more of our voices are heard. We must hear not just the superheroes' voice but also the voices of the disadvantaged and the most pained among us. Flaherty describes how the "privilege of the able bodied leads to people with disabilities being being pushed out of our movements and our society" (Flaherty 2016, 20). He calls attention to how Disability Justice says "we all must move forward together or it's not really justice" (Flaherty 2016, 20).
The most successful communes in Doctorow's Walkaway are those that don't force their citizens to compete. One leader of a failed commune reflects on his own previously aggressive and hyper-competitive mindset. He'd once ruthlessly critiqued the groups who went without leaderboards and shamed those who couldn't keep up. He later observes that such community members were not the problem:“It twists my head that I only started disbelieving in useful and useless people when I proved to be useless. Then I had this revelation that the scale I’d judged people on--the scale that I was failing on-- was irrelevant.” (Doctorow 2017, 208)This brings us right back to Bartleby and his boss's frustration at how to consider and treat his refusing employee once Bartleby wasn't fit for work. Was Bartleby a mere managerial challenge? A puzzle to fix? Or an embarrassment, an eyesore, a problem to be gotten rid of? He was much more than that, which is why Melville makes Bartleby's situation so impossible to "look away from".
There is no single 'Superhero' individual who can resurrect librarianship's "once glorious kingdom" to it's real or imagined former prestige. Individually, not even those among us who have organizational or professional power/prestige, can bring our entire profession to a state of equity or equilibrium. But through communal consciousness raising whether it happens on twitter, on librarian blogs, in journals just like CJAL, or in any of the communities where we share ideas, we can begin conversations that help us mount collective concerted efforts that build firmer ground upon which to resolve our issues and move forward together.
Our organizational weaknesses show. There's more than one reason we don't always refuse or debunk constructed scarcity when we could or should. Our weaknesses were hard felt during the COVID-19 pandemic situation. We recognize that'll it'll take more than one person, more than one action to situate ourselves better and that it will require collective as well as individual action. This does not mean we shouldn't have optimism to tackle the barriers that prevent us from occupying our profession more fully--we may be living in a cyberpunk dystopia, but there are avenues that allow us to design our way out of the situations we've inherited. -
1
2021-09-14T12:53:52-07:00
Saviour Mentality
3
plain
2021-09-14T13:10:42-07:00
A savior mentality leads a well-meaning person to overlook the needs of the people they are trying to help, often leading to further marginalization and harm.