Housing Inequality in AmericaMain MenuThe Generational Illusion: An EssayAn Essay by Collin AndrewsEnvironmental Racism: How Residential Segregation Shapes Environmental InequalityHistoric Preservation Coast to CoastTitle PageNative American Housing: How Poor Housing Harms Indigenous HealthHow Poor Housing Harms Indigenous HealthPets & Housing: It's "Ruff" by Katie ClineHow NIMBYism Exacerbates Housing InequalityWhere's the Wealth!How Housing Discrimination has led to racial wealth inequality in the United StatesImmigrant Housing Inequality in AmericaIswat JinadSurveillance InequalityAn investigation into how poor communities are oversurveilled creating a cycle of more targeted and aggressive forms of surveillance for them and those around them.Post-WWII Urban Flight and the Birth of the SuburbsHousing Discrimination in Suburban AmericaRace, Repressive State Apparatus, and Homelessness: From Colonialism to COVID-19Tina NandiHousing Inequality and Access to Quality EducationMQ: Title PageVisualizing racial housing discriminationSplash page for path that includes interactive resources regarding racial housing discriminationProject information and creditsAndy Schocket278555063cc66428c8eadf42f48d412091c5aaf9Melissa Laddab8653014603439710b65435181f2130cee53400Andrew Bartelc9a57442f34fea7858b734ce98f4ec79bd5565b0Collin Andrewsf69afa6ae7fb0f33058b9e0cb476f7451a667cefTina Nandi6e38643c2c1510534cce4e954f0eeb8108bce699Iswat Jinad196dd805bf51f7a46fbf2d94ab069e97fc004d75Marcus Harris7e23857364c2363b25872718aea81323bdd37773James Cousinoe9398a1542d344c824ddaaf967819ae589cd2b61Katie Cline512add1943f75cbd770d4788dcdea90b706922c4Trisha A Bonham7fa13b399c9331700d719225b96f3bf9e54c4570Rene Oswald Ayalac01cc7385c24c3926f2f03a40860f6a4f703f410Kristine Ketel826fdfc33a24cff2c1e0ab79396dd2ae2bae3ed9Morgan Quinleyc8a47798c223cced64347bc9a7d80f6a64402e45
A Brief History of Environmental Justice
12022-12-06T15:22:36-08:00Rene Oswald Ayalac01cc7385c24c3926f2f03a40860f6a4f703f410412373Provides a history of how the federal government has responded to demands to address environmental injustice.plain2022-12-06T15:29:24-08:00YouTube2017-08-04T18:34:24Z30xLg2HHg8QProPublicaRene Oswald Ayalac01cc7385c24c3926f2f03a40860f6a4f703f410
This page is referenced by:
12022-12-05T19:40:26-08:00Explanations for Environmental Racism: Discriminatory Siting and Weak Regulation14plain2022-12-12T08:27:25-08:00Initially, a lot of attention was paid to how and why waste producing facilities were placed in or near communities of color. In the years following the 1987 report, various studies continued to find that waste facilities were likely to exist near both predominantly poor and communities of color.Was this an instance of an intentional act of discrimination where government officials intentionally targeted these communities?
Hamilton (1995) examined expansion plans of waste facilities from 1987-1992 to see if the racial percentage of the communities chosen for expansion differed significantly from those that weren’t chosen.Hamilton found that neighborhoods selected for expansion were on average 25% non-white in comparison to those neighborhoods not chosen which averaged 18% non-white. Therefore, the racial composition of a neighborhood did seem to play a role in the decision making of toxic waste facilities. Similarly, Pastor, Sadd, and Hipp (2001), intervening in the debate about whether waste facilities were placed in communities of color or if people of color moved in after the fact due to the neighborhood becoming cheaper to live in, found that in Los Angeles planned locations for toxic waste facilities already had sizeable working class and people of color communities before the sites were built.
Studies like these suggest that the racial composition of different neighborhoods played some role in the decision-making process of where to site toxic waste facilities. Both Hamilton (1995) and Pastor et. al. (2001) argue that a potential explanation is that managers of toxic waste facilities considered the potential backlash by residents of proposed sites. Communities with sizeable working class and residents of color were assumed to not have inspired the same level of collective action against the expansion of these toxic waste facilities as expansion in a whiter and wealthier neighborhood would.
Others have considered the action, or inaction, of government officials and agencies, to deal with cases of environmental inequality that predominantly affected people of color and the working class as instances like the water crisis in Flint, Michigan occur “despite existing regulations to protect the American people from contamination in their drinking water.” Many have drawn attention to how officials have neglected a responsibility to act through delayed responses and lack of enforcement of environmental regulations or have acted in ways that have not adequately addressed the problem by spreading misinformation or impractical solutions.
This video details the history of how the federal government has neglected its responsibility to address environmental inequality, which has served to make communities of color more vulnerable to environmental hazards:
In their report 20 years after “Toxic Waste and Race,” Bullard et. al. (2008) argued that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has not had a great record when it comes to addressing environmental racism. The agency only began to acknowledge how environmental inequality disproportionately affected communities of color in the 1990s after pressure from community activists. Over the years, budget cuts and restructuring have resulted in the EPA cutting or defunding offices within the agency that were meant to address environmental racism or not properly enforcing regulations that could prevent the worst consequences of environmental inequality. Thompson (2021) argues that the EPA’s inability to properly address the problem is a product of the agency’s early history of promoting voluntary compliance to environmental regulations and its refusal to use its grants to enforce civil rights. State and local agencies have also been found to not follow or enforce regulations properly, resulting in populations like Flint, Michigan being failed at multiple levels of government.