Thanks for your patience during our recent outage at scalar.usc.edu. While Scalar content is loading normally now, saving is still slow, and Scalar's 'additional metadata' features have been disabled, which may interfere with features like timelines and maps that depend on metadata. This also means that saving a page or media item will remove its additional metadata. If this occurs, you can use the 'All versions' link at the bottom of the page to restore the earlier version. We are continuing to troubleshoot, and will provide further updates as needed. Note that this only affects Scalar projects at scalar.usc.edu, and not those hosted elsewhere.
Reckoning Time in Medieval Pisa Main MenuReckoning Time in Medieval PisaThe Textual Tradition of a Pisan Chronicle[Path 1]Chronicled TimeTechnological Process[Path 3]ConclusionsContributorsFurther ReadingNicholas Brown0eb570939c30a9ffeae6c6f9c61c0bfbe0279672Daryl P. Jacksone396a7fe11f4ae55904e5238207d921b28b0cb72Hannah Jones9fd3692ef3b42eef9cf0438b5c2a4855c2acfd56Laura Morrealeea5968063e9bb73752be7c434e8e3458b2daad8e
Kaleidoscope screen shot
12019-04-26T20:36:03-07:00Daryl P. Jacksone396a7fe11f4ae55904e5238207d921b28b0cb72327493This screen shot shows the output of Kaleidoscopeplainpublished2019-04-26T20:48:40-07:00Hannah Jones9fd3692ef3b42eef9cf0438b5c2a4855c2acfd56
Although two versions of the small Pisan chronicle are extant, studies on Pisan historiography and the events recounted in the work reference the printed RRIISS version almost exclusively. Given the limited exposure of the British Library's manuscript, we were eager to identify differences among these two versions and to be able to references the variations easily and quickly. The differences were helpful to us as we researched questions about the use of temporal markers, and will certainly be useful to others wishing to place the BL manuscript in context of current research.
After searching through many digital textual comparison tools, we determined that Kaleidoscope had features which aligned most closely with our project needs. The tool marks and presents every difference in the text in one place so that we can easily visualize them and then discern the relative importance of those changes.
The files use to compare the texts are .txt files, or standard, unformatted text files. We chose this file type because it allows for a simple comparison of the text and spaces without any additional information being considered. We downloaded the transcriptions created in FromThePage, including the tagged temporal markers and other ancillary information. We then converted the downloaded information into plain text in Apple TextEdit before importing it to Kaleidoscope for a final comparison. In this way, we compared only the actual text of each witness and excluded anything that was added to aid our research.
Kaleidoscope permitted the discovery of some significant differences between these two versions of the text, including a large portion of text omitted in the print edition and smaller variations that support our conclusions about the existence of multiple manuscript copies.
