This page was created by Alexis Kratzer. The last update was by Jeanne Britton.
The Digital PiranesiMain MenuAboutThe Digital Piranesi is a developing digital humanities project that aims to provide an enhanced digital edition of the works of Italian illustrator Giovanni Battista Piranesi (1720-1778).Works and VolumesGenres, Subjects, and ThemesBibliographyGlossary
View of the Remains of the Praetorian Fort in Hadrian's Villa
12018-11-07T16:46:31-08:00Alexis Kratzerb246b0b192071919d0499d7b3d52bbdb381776462284916Veduta degli avanzi del Castro Pretorio nella Villa Adriana a Tivoliplain2022-07-02T05:50:38-07:00Title: Veduta degli avanzi del Castro Pretorio nella Villa Adriana a Tivoli Signature: Cavalier piranesi delin(eavit). ed inc(idit).Title: View of the Remains of the Praetorian Fort at Hadrian’s Villa Signature: Designed and engraved by the Knight Piranesi.Jeanne Brittone120651dde677d5cf1fd515358b14d86eb289f11This view depicts the remains of what is now called the East-West Terrace and the Ambulatory Wall at Hadrian’s Villa, which had been designated as the Stoa Poecile [or Poikile]. A space for social leisure, it is depicted as broad and vast in this image, which, almost twice as wide as it is high, differs in proportion from Piranesi’s other views of Rome. Many of his views of Rome employ sharp diagonals that begin at the upper corners of a page and drop towards its center, but this image is exceptional for the length of the diagonal, which nearly extends to the vanishing point, disappearing in a row of modest apartments (for guests or staff) with Monte Ripoli in the distance. For Piranesi, this engraving is an uncommon combination of architectural and landscape views, which is possible in the rural setting of Hadrian’s Villa. Pinto and MacDonald note that this view’s emphasis on landscape is replaced by an emphasis, in the later views of Hadrian’s Villa, on “architectural containment and envelopment” (258). While the proportions of the image together with the extent of the diagonal invite viewers into an expansive outdoor space, the human figures, the caption, and the mounds of eroded architectural fragments along the heavily-shaded bottom edge of the image position a sizeable boundary between the viewer and the image’s central space. Bert Verschaffel has argued that Piranesi’s views, especially as they are encountered in bound volumes, place great emphasis on their foreground, where a viewer would first encounter an image. As such, the angular, gesturing men around the bottom edge of this view are obstacles rather than invitations into the image; Piranesi’s human figures in general thwart identification and seem to guard the spaces they inhabit, limiting rather than encouraging entry (135). Human figures in earlier landscape or architectural views tended to serve as surrogates for the viewer, offering a position of identification through which a viewer could behold an artwork’s subject. To imaginatively enter an image such as this one, according to Susan Stewart, viewers must forge an individual path and see from a subjective position (178). Both invited and repelled by the image’s complex composition, viewers must make their own way into its scene. (JB)
To see this image in the Vedute di Roma, volume 17 of Piranesi’s Opere, click here.
1media/Picture2.jpgmedia/17 Frontispiece cropped.jpg2018-10-19T10:30:22-07:00Jeanne Brittone120651dde677d5cf1fd515358b14d86eb289f11Views of Rome (2 of 2)Jeanne Britton42Vedute di Romaimage_header2022-07-18T14:51:25-07:00Jeanne Brittone120651dde677d5cf1fd515358b14d86eb289f11